Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

caseymoz

(5,763 posts)
104. The way you force your straw man is rude.
Tue Apr 2, 2013, 02:49 PM
Apr 2013

I won't answer your insistence that I have faith, because I've given you as complete a description of my thinking as I can, and you've rejected it. Your reiterating the point-- that I have faith, yes I really do-- is ineffective. It didn't work before. And it's not going to work now that I've made my reasoning explicit to you.

What I've said doesn't fit the Catholic narrative of what unbelievers believe and why they're going to Hell, so you've twisted my words into something you know how to rebut. It's the same rebuttal you started with when you chimed in. It's still just a declaration, not an argument, you've added no support to it. Fact is, you don't know how to answer what I've written, so you disregard it and tell me what I really believe. It's creepy. Sort of like records of inquisitions I've read, where the defendant answers the inquisitor's question, while the inquisitor tells him what he's really saying.

I really have nothing else I to say about that. You either can reread what I've written, or continue to reject it, but I won't be drawn into your argument that I have faith in no God.

I haven't a clue about why people believe in God? I've seen it enough. I've talked to people about it enough. I've had faith myself. I've listened to homilies. I have family members who have faith. I've been to Catholic religion class. I've been to Catholic retreats, and so on.

My conclusion from all of it: propagating a fear of Hell-- even subtly-- into young minds, is very effective to creating belief in God, especially when you add some social pressure about it, hidden or overt.

Of course, you're not supposed to believe in God from fear of Hell (except at last resort, if it works). However, God is watching everything, including your mind, and love is supposed to be your motive for faith. With that pressure, you're going to convince yourself to do things for the right reasons, and you're not even going to let yourself think you're doing it to save your eternal soul. You get used to this before you're in mid-childhood, knowing nothing else. Once the habit of believing is instilled, and you don't remember why you originally thought there was a God, then you're free to choose the higher motives for your faith.

And there are many levels of denial that allow this. It would be correct to say most do it for the higher reasons, because they truthfully believe that's why they're doing it. Therefore, yes, there are other reasons besides avoiding Hell for people to believe in God. (Believe in, rather than say, just believe a creator of some kind exists.)

But everybody has a unconscious mind, and it's likely not forthcoming to the conscious one. It's true of me, too. Give less credence to what people say about themselves and watch how they behave.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

The old guard is really running scared. Pab Sungenis Mar 2013 #1
you had the same thought I did niyad Mar 2013 #2
Me, too. In fact I posted it. nt caseymoz Apr 2013 #60
The Old Guard is like the Republican wing of the Vatican Berlum Apr 2013 #41
The article shows both Reactionaries and Libs wary about which way he will jump UTUSN Mar 2013 #3
I'm not expecting radical reform. RandySF Mar 2013 #4
I'd be happy if he reaffirmed Vatican II UTUSN Mar 2013 #6
No, the clenched toes are saying, pnwmom Mar 2013 #13
I hope he doesn't get Athlete's Mouth... JoeBlowToo Apr 2013 #103
Isn't the Pope Infallible? So Critics are Heretics. dballance Mar 2013 #5
The term of art is "inerrent in questions of faith" Bucky Mar 2013 #8
Thank You for an Alternate View dballance Mar 2013 #11
But only when he declares a doctrine "ex cathedra" which has only happened twice in history. n/t pnwmom Mar 2013 #15
Infallibility's only been invoked a handful of times in the last few centuries anyway. Posteritatis Mar 2013 #31
Burn them! nt. OldDem2012 Mar 2013 #10
No... RudynJack Mar 2013 #12
Only when he makes a statement "ex cathedra" -- that is, under certain specific conditions pnwmom Mar 2013 #14
Ridiculous comment Drahthaardogs Mar 2013 #16
Well, First of All... dballance Mar 2013 #17
Okay, sit back and I will explain Drahthaardogs Mar 2013 #25
Thanks for the Education - Really. dballance Mar 2013 #27
You seem to follow Jesus' teachings a lot better than that sarcastic "explainer." nt SunSeeker Apr 2013 #59
I do try to be a student of life dballance Apr 2013 #68
Keep up the good work. SunSeeker Apr 2013 #75
Thank You dballance Apr 2013 #112
Yes, Bob Forbid anyone should confuse gibberish with religious dogma. Warren DeMontague Apr 2013 #50
LOL. nt SunSeeker Apr 2013 #58
Yeah, cause the Catholic Church is so bad, we can blame for it shit it does not even believe. Drahthaardogs Apr 2013 #64
No, I think the stuff it actually claims is bad enough. Warren DeMontague Apr 2013 #66
Then call it out on one like that, Drahthaardogs Apr 2013 #71
What am I arguing? I made a joke about the indistinguishability of religious dogma from gibberish. Warren DeMontague Apr 2013 #74
Or nationalism. Or economics. Or politics. Or even philosophies.. LanternWaste Apr 2013 #69
No, economics deals with things that are real. Money is real. Labor is real. Buying, selling, Warren DeMontague Apr 2013 #73
We want Barabas! FSogol Apr 2013 #70
Please take some humility lessons from your wonderful Pope. Common Sense Party Apr 2013 #78
He's "narrowly" infallible. caseymoz Apr 2013 #62
Where the hell did you come up with this bullshit? Drahthaardogs Apr 2013 #72
Not conjecture, that was sarcasm. caseymoz Apr 2013 #81
You can't prove your last sentence. It is, therefore, a statement of faith. patrice Apr 2013 #85
I have been trying to say that in other threads Fortinbras Armstrong Apr 2013 #89
The nature of what we refer to as "proof", upon which all rational empiricism, that is, what patrice Apr 2013 #95
Which is my point Fortinbras Armstrong Apr 2013 #96
Except . . . caseymoz Apr 2013 #107
Abiogenesis cannot be reproduced in a laboratory. Drahthaardogs Apr 2013 #111
And how many other possible explanations are there caseymoz Apr 2013 #113
Just like you can't prove Zeus doesn't exist. trotsky Apr 2013 #108
You don't have to do that. caseymoz Apr 2013 #110
I'll reiterate why it's not. caseymoz Apr 2013 #97
Not exactly Fortinbras Armstrong Apr 2013 #100
The way you force your straw man is rude. caseymoz Apr 2013 #104
You understand the difference between knowing and believing. caseymoz Apr 2013 #93
You do realize that your "source" asked when the Pope issues an encyclical, right? Drahthaardogs Apr 2013 #109
Does it occur to you they don't weigh it at all? caseymoz Apr 2013 #114
Wrong! Fortinbras Armstrong Apr 2013 #88
Thank you for the correction, caseymoz Apr 2013 #92
The problem is that if you say things that are demonstrably untrue Fortinbras Armstrong Apr 2013 #94
Unless you can cite a representative survey of Catholics caseymoz Apr 2013 #99
THIS! backscatter712 Apr 2013 #102
TPM: Pope's Easter Homily on the role of women is "upsetting apple carts" Bucky Mar 2013 #7
So far I like him too. I'm not Catholic so I'm not up on Raine Mar 2013 #24
This is how he is supposed to be. AngryOldDem Apr 2013 #39
+1 for "Mentos version of Thomas Aquinas" n/t Beartracks Apr 2013 #37
Darn right!...... OldDem2012 Mar 2013 #9
That may be unlikely. R. Daneel Olivaw Mar 2013 #19
Benedict is no longer pope. R. Daneel Olivaw Mar 2013 #18
deep snooper2 Mar 2013 #20
Poor babies, and there is so little royalty left these days to idolize Warpy Mar 2013 #21
"a militant humility" BainsBane Mar 2013 #22
That's those Jesuits for you AnnieBW Mar 2013 #33
Anything that pisses off extreme Catholics is good in my book. Apophis Mar 2013 #23
These people act as if there's nothing wrong with the Church that returning to tradition can't fix BeyondGeography Mar 2013 #26
Hopefully traditionalist Catholics and Teabaggers will be thrown in the dustbin of history. Crowman1979 Mar 2013 #28
Of course they will broadcaster75201 Mar 2013 #30
Sell all that you have and give it to the poor. Waiting on something real, not a photo-op NT broadcaster75201 Mar 2013 #29
The Holy Spirit is Alive and Making Mischief AnnieBW Mar 2013 #32
K&R DeSwiss Apr 2013 #34
I want to somehow use "spittle-flecked nutty" in daily conversation. LOL n/t Beartracks Apr 2013 #35
Footwashing is a very old tradition and BlueMTexpat Apr 2013 #36
Yeah! How DARE he act like a Christian! AngryOldDem Apr 2013 #38
Ain't that the truth. raouldukelives Apr 2013 #45
Some powers-that-be of the RCC are going to be dragged out of the 3rd century screaming and kicking. bulloney Apr 2013 #40
Are we seeing a Pope who cares Andy Stanton Apr 2013 #42
Those numbskulls can all go straight to hell. Sheldon Cooper Apr 2013 #43
Not a roman catholic JustAnotherGen Apr 2013 #44
This is all about class and not about religion starroute Apr 2013 #46
Even the most faithful Catholics realize that there something dreadfully wrong. olegramps Apr 2013 #47
I think the RCC may have a Father Pedro for pope Wolf Frankula Apr 2013 #48
I hope Ratzinger's grinding his teeth wryter2000 Apr 2013 #49
don't they understand the importance of good foot hygiene? ZRT2209 Apr 2013 #51
I am starting to like this Pope! Rex Apr 2013 #52
"militant humility"... awoke_in_2003 Apr 2013 #53
Best made up term ive heard in awhile Bradical79 Apr 2013 #105
Really? The last straw? Shadowflash Apr 2013 #54
We might have a term that identifies a liberal Catholic, WHEN CRABS ROAR Apr 2013 #55
the traditionalists knew he would do this madrchsod Apr 2013 #56
The Church leadership desperately needs some humility and openness JPZenger Apr 2013 #57
So this guy is pope for less than 2 weeks and they pack it in that quickly? Javaman Apr 2013 #61
People are upset over helping the poor? caseymoz Apr 2013 #63
+1000 smirkymonkey Apr 2013 #65
Let me rephrase that Fortinbras Armstrong Apr 2013 #90
This is where the Traditionalists get to practice what they preach Demeter Apr 2013 #67
Damn that "militant humility~!" MADem Apr 2013 #76
Yeah, who the hell needs a Mass you can understand and SHARE by participating in it? patrice Apr 2013 #77
God speaks English now instead of Latin? Manifestor_of_Light Apr 2013 #82
I did that kind of stuff 6 days a week for 12 years of my life: Gregorian Chant, sacristan, Legion patrice Apr 2013 #83
here is the TRAGEDY DonCoquixote Apr 2013 #79
There are different perspectives on all of that. You have picked the one that you like, probably on patrice Apr 2013 #84
Trying to philosophize? DonCoquixote Apr 2013 #86
Where's the pedicure spa??? Huh?? Jesus with toenail clippers?? Manifestor_of_Light Apr 2013 #80
I think the whole foot washing thing is creepy Sky Masterson Apr 2013 #87
Haters are going to hate.... AnneD Apr 2013 #91
The hypocrisy is astounding! backscatter712 Apr 2013 #98
LOL! Politicalboi Apr 2013 #101
Are catholic feet traditionally dirty? unblock Apr 2013 #106
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Pope’s Foot-Wash a Final ...»Reply #104