Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: ‘Illegal immigrant’ no more [View all]Starry Messenger
(32,382 posts)21. They go into detail at the end on what terminology they intend to use
illegal immigration Entering or residing in a country in violation of civil or criminal law. Except in direct quotes essential to the story, use illegal only to refer to an action, not a person: illegal immigration, but not illegal immigrant. Acceptable variations include living in or entering a country illegally or without legal permission.
<snip>
Specify wherever possible how someone entered the country illegally and from where. Crossed the border? Overstayed a visa? What nationality?
People who were brought into the country as children should not be described as having immigrated illegally. For people granted a temporary right to remain in the U.S. under the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, use temporary resident status, with details on the program lower in the story.
The shift is to describe an action, not label a person as an action or status itself, from what I understand.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
83 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Obviously you don't look to "Tropic Thunder" for language lessons... and it shows.
LooseWilly
Apr 2013
#54
If you read "speed" as "drive without an operator's license" I can see why you insist on simplicity
LooseWilly
Apr 2013
#64
Speeding does not make you an "illegal driver". Murder does not make you an "illegal immigrant".
ZOB
Apr 2013
#65
I tried to show him the wisdom of "Tropic Thunder"... but he wouldn't listen
LooseWilly
Apr 2013
#70
ICE still uses that term & "illegal alien", while DHS uses "unauthorized immigrant"
alp227
Apr 2013
#77
More gobbledegook so we will all sound like politicians campaigning, with the effect that no one can
RC
Apr 2013
#4
Well, that certainly is a well reasoned comment... and ironic coming from a "historian"
LooseWilly
Apr 2013
#47
But Immigration & Customs Enforcement still uses "illegal immigrant" and "illegal alien".
alp227
Apr 2013
#79
By your logic, if I sped to get "here" then I am "not here legally", so I am "an illegal"
LooseWilly
Apr 2013
#57
Yeah, so instead of using simple descriptive words, we use long gobbledegook sentences
RC
Apr 2013
#83
Good! "Illegal" should not be used to describe a person whether they have broken driving laws
pampango
Apr 2013
#6
Yes. The depersonalizing term is connected to the rise of hate crimes against Latinos.
Starry Messenger
Apr 2013
#8
Editors in the media, from college newspapers to ... the AP, use the stylebook as Law
LooseWilly
Apr 2013
#48
I don't think it'll be a big problem for most writers... unless they're simply limited by space.
LooseWilly
Apr 2013
#50
You present a fine point... though I wrote that lede to specifically make it a relevant point.
LooseWilly
Apr 2013
#76
Heh, maybe we should just do away with the media entirely and all entertain each other with lively
LooseWilly
Apr 2013
#82
AP seems to be of the reasoned opinion that the pixels will not be too crowded.
Starry Messenger
Apr 2013
#61
Wow. The ultimate in political correctness. Deeming a term offensive without naming a replacement.
Nye Bevan
Apr 2013
#68
It's not political correctness, in the context of the AP style guide, to "nix" a term
LooseWilly
Apr 2013
#73