Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: CA: Bill introduced to legally equate e-cigs to cigarettes. [View all]Lizzie Poppet
(10,164 posts)16. And multiple studies failed to find ANYTHING harmful to bystanders from the exhaled vapor.
First off, the actual toxic and carcinogenic materials associated with smoking are produced by combustion, and are not present in e-cig vapor.
The very large majority of nicotine produced is absorbed by the smoker. the trace amounts exhaled are in such small quantity that they were undetectible in controlled experimental conditions with normal amounts of smoking. If one were to inhale all of an e-cig smoker's exhalation, after about 300 puffs (!), you'd have roughly the equivalent of one low-dosage stick of nicotine gum. You might get that much nicotine in a room packed full of e-cig smokers in about half an hour...maybe.
Legislators panicking and acting in utter ignorance of what they're passing laws about...gosh, what a surprise.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
191 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The manufacturers sued the govt. for the right to be classified as a tobacco product.
pnwmom
Apr 2013
#164
A lightly scented deodorant, hell, baby powder smells stronger than an e-cig, seriously. And I hope
Mnemosyne
Apr 2013
#189
No, the people not considering them a health hazard actually have an idea of what nicotine's LD50 is
jeff47
Apr 2013
#17
perfectly reasonable - you suck in nicotine then blow it back out...poisons everyone around you nt
msongs
Apr 2013
#7
And multiple studies failed to find ANYTHING harmful to bystanders from the exhaled vapor.
Lizzie Poppet
Apr 2013
#16
If heroine were legal, I still wouldn't want to see people shooting up in the park
bhikkhu
Apr 2013
#108
I think the existing level of regulation and restriction of cigarettes is adequate
bhikkhu
Apr 2013
#160
Of course they did, they learned that if you can call them cigs, you can tax them like cigs. n/t
hughee99
Apr 2013
#150
Interesting because all my nonsmoking friends say they can't smell anything when I smoke them.
Luminous Animal
Apr 2013
#65
Authoritarian is authoritarian. Left/Right isn't really significant in the way you are thinking
TheKentuckian
Apr 2013
#85
I've been evaping for years. I used it to quit smoking. I don't even use nicotine any longer, just
OregonBlue
Apr 2013
#88
You got spanked by everyone for the ignorant statement you made in #6
DisgustipatedinCA
Apr 2013
#109
stick to facts and not straw man arguments full of projection and you will not be called out on it.
TeamPooka
Apr 2013
#148
The one thing that actually helps me smoke less will become unaffordable. The result, for me will
robinlynne
Apr 2013
#132
E-cigs must be regulated as tobacco products because the manufacturers won a lawsuit
pnwmom
Apr 2013
#165
Okay, whatever. I don't actually care enough about this to research and post links.
Matariki
Apr 2013
#177
For you, as a smoker, the benefits outweigh the risks. You will clearly be exposed
pnwmom
Apr 2013
#184