Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

In reply to the discussion: Social Security [View all]

polynomial

(750 posts)
36. The philosophy of everything
Wed Apr 3, 2013, 09:01 AM
Apr 2013

You will have to start laughing about this comment because the other day watching MSNBC both Chris Hays and Rachael Maddow report about the latest civics news, death, corruption, scandal, guns, gays, wars, and loads of secret stuff busting from the seams where it’s the Congress stupid. Most of the time retelling things faster than a stuck page forward on the computer.

Where money is free speech with “bag o money” is flying around faster than a Blago’s scandal seventy times seven. Here with legions of Democrats that peels off the pledge of allegiance to both the flag and the Constitution support the Republican Wahhabi formula that underscores the political teasing terrorist Tea Party, our very own Congress promoting the festering and sequestering of poor and middle class America. The perfect Wahhabi way to conquer America without invading it.

These entire news journalist making six figure salaries that are perhaps magna cum laude lawyers or MBA type college graduates prove one thing; statistical fornication can be created by legislation.

Also, gerrymandered Grand Juries have been upon Americans for decades. Allah Michigan, many call it the French Persian version of the Republican Wahhabi politics that scrap Democracy and appoint Nazi local skin heads to run communities gone sour. What ever happened to sending in coaching, or advisors to help rather than to replace? Or better yet indict or convict corruption. Sheesh.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Social Security [View all] ashling Apr 2013 OP
The one percent need the two trillion. Skink Apr 2013 #1
Plus all future deposits. nm rhett o rick Apr 2013 #6
they already got it trekbiker Apr 2013 #9
Agreed - these benefits aren't being stored as convertible gold erronis Apr 2013 #15
they're 'cashed in' nearly every day. HiPointDem Apr 2013 #34
They've already spent it, too. nt valerief Apr 2013 #23
Grayson... awoke_in_2003 Apr 2013 #2
+1 forestpath Apr 2013 #4
Walkin' the Talk Plucketeer Apr 2013 #14
Yep, a rare, rare bird. nt valerief Apr 2013 #24
K&R dmr Apr 2013 #3
kick 840high Apr 2013 #5
$2 trillion? Somebody needs to try to steal that. tclambert Apr 2013 #7
not to worry dothemath Apr 2013 #18
Grayson has always nailed this issue. Wellstone ruled Apr 2013 #8
All my Boomer Life they've been saying it won't be there when it's my time Demeter Apr 2013 #11
why 71? Skittles Apr 2013 #19
That's right... ReRe Apr 2013 #10
Saying "in the bank" might not be so good considering the banks are seen as crooked. Spitfire of ATJ Apr 2013 #12
Well then, defacto7 Apr 2013 #25
If only the prez were a little more Graysonesque. Maven Apr 2013 #13
It is EXTREMELY ironic that he used the phrase "in the bank" joeglow3 Apr 2013 #16
They (the securities) are actually in a locked file cabinet at the Bureau of Public Debt... PoliticAverse Apr 2013 #38
Yeah. And cashing those in is gonna be easy. joeglow3 Apr 2013 #39
glad he is back dothemath Apr 2013 #17
I heard an audio clip today of Reagan basically saying SS will never be touched. L0oniX Apr 2013 #20
yet reagan touched it, big time. HiPointDem Apr 2013 #33
Rep. Grayson Iwillnevergiveup Apr 2013 #21
I so totally agree with your post! trayfoot Apr 2013 #22
Then why don't they talk about tweaking it? Why not address it before the cliff? dkf Apr 2013 #26
Because there's no need to 'address it' 25 years before the (predicted) 'crisis' that may never HiPointDem Apr 2013 #32
Because our reps in the house and senate .. have plenty of money ... YOHABLO Apr 2013 #27
"minor tweaks"... isn't chained CPI a minor tweak? n/t taught_me_patience Apr 2013 #28
Message auto-removed khushivis Apr 2013 #29
Old news. We know the facts. The White House CHOOSES not to listen. Wonder why? blkmusclmachine Apr 2013 #30
Repay before tweaking. HiPointDem Apr 2013 #31
For the sake of accuracy, there is actually zero "in the bank.". Nye Bevan Apr 2013 #35
The philosophy of everything polynomial Apr 2013 #36
So why isn't Obama saying just that? Oh, never mind. n/t truth2power Apr 2013 #37
Great thread....... suston96 Apr 2013 #40
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Social Security»Reply #36