Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: OMG - North Carolina GOP Doesn't Think Constitution Applies to THEM??? [View all]IdaBriggs
(10,559 posts)28. Gary Freeze (from the article you found): "the verge of being neo-secessionist."
Further,
http://www.salisburypost.com/article/20130403/SP01/130409910/1023/lawmakers-file-rowan-county-defense-of-religion-act
Catawba College politics Professor Michael Bitzer likened the resolutions ideology to that of many Southern states following the U.S. Supreme Courts Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, Kan., decision in 1954 that required nationwide public school integration.
They basically want to ensure that a long line of U.S. Supreme Court rulings have no validity either here in Rowan County or here in the entire state, Bitzer said. Theyre basing it on to put it mildly discredited legal theory that the states can deny the power of the federal government within their jurisdiction. We saw this in the aftermath of Brown v. Board of Education. The belief is that the states hold more power than the federal government. If the federal government does something, the states can simply ignore it.
(snip)
In a statement released Tuesday, ACLU of North Carolina Legal Director Chris Brook took aim at the resolution.
The bill sponsors fundamentally misunderstand constitutional law and the principles of the separation of powers that date back to the founding of this country, Brook wrote.
I don't know what statutes to charge them under - I personally want them tarred, feathered, and run out of the country by an angry mob! - but I DO NOT WANT TO HAVE TO REVISIT THE END OF SLAVERY AND MY RIGHT AS A WOMAN TO VOTE, LET ALONE THAT I HAVE RELIGIOUS FREEDOM (among other benefits).
Anyone who tries to remove those things locally deserves Jail at the very least. I can pick up some roofing tar, and feathers are cheap.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
102 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
OMG - North Carolina GOP Doesn't Think Constitution Applies to THEM??? [View all]
IdaBriggs
Apr 2013
OP
Actually, considering a similar act started the civil war, it could be considered an act of war.
Sirveri
Apr 2013
#96
Sovereign Rule was behind all the whack legal reasoning that took place in my
Baitball Blogger
Apr 2013
#15
Pick and choose what portions of the Constitution, and women lose the right to vote/slavery is ok
IdaBriggs
Apr 2013
#7
"Does Not Recognize Federal Court Rulings" & Constitution Does Not Apply to NC --
IdaBriggs
Apr 2013
#16
Gary Freeze (from the article you found): "the verge of being neo-secessionist."
IdaBriggs
Apr 2013
#28
Do you think the members of any county commission who begins their meeting with prayer
el_bryanto
Apr 2013
#29
I think anyone who tries to say the CONSTITUTION DOESN'T APPLY deserves jail.
IdaBriggs
Apr 2013
#31
The point is not that the bill will go nowhere-it should never have been introduced.
hobbit709
Apr 2013
#11
If they want to pray before a meeting they should do it the way Jesus tells you to.
hobbit709
Apr 2013
#17
I'm not saying I agree with them; I'm saying I can see where they are coming from
el_bryanto
Apr 2013
#24
No doubt these are loonies but they aren't traitors and it would be unconstitutional to arrest them
onenote
Apr 2013
#44
I am pissed at the moment. Then again, I have to keep fighting for my daughter's right
IdaBriggs
Apr 2013
#48
You do realize these guys will be using this to bolster their re-election campaign, right?
IdaBriggs
Apr 2013
#54
So states can also enact legislation that nullifies the 2nd amendment, right?
reflection
Apr 2013
#60
Yep, they want a theocratic state. That, can then go along with the dystopia republicans lust for.
RKP5637
Apr 2013
#77
My wife's 17th-century North Carolina immigrant ancestor was a Moravian: North Carolina should
indepat
Apr 2013
#90
Re:Do they also get to pick and choose whether or not there is an individual state policy on SLAVERY
abq e streeter
Apr 2013
#102