General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Will Obama's Nobel Peace Prize be revoked? [View all]JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)If we wanted our troops to stay, we could have done so again.
You seem to be confusing "total immunity" with "total local jurisdiction". Those are the extreme ends of the scale, not the only two points on it.
We have agreements with other countries where are troops do not have total immunity, but the local government does not have total jurisdiction either. The details of the agreement land between those extremes.
If Obama really wanted the troops to stay, the administration could have negotiated to a point between those extremes, and the troops would still be there.
But that did not happen. And there was no need for it to happen, because we were in fact, leaving.
Your argument about GITMO and about Bush and torture and executions, while hyperbolic, don't help advance the argument that "Obama really wanted to continue the Iraq war".