Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: CA: Bill introduced to legally equate e-cigs to cigarettes. [View all]Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)125. interesting tid bit regarding e-cig evolution
FDA tried to initially control the products as a 'drug delivery vehicle' and because it was being marketed as a smoking cessation product. Something the FDA would normally regulate to ensure ingredients safety and that the product actually does what the promoter says it does.
The original e-cig mfg went to court and successfully won a suite claiming that the FDA does not have jurisdiction over the product. The judge agreed and because the product does contain tobacco (in some cases) and the addictive additives that made tobacco so harmful and difficult to resist, the judge said instead that it could and should be regulated like tobacco.
http://changelabsolutions.org/tobacco-control/question/are-e-cigarettes-regulate
The FDA appealed the lower courts ruling to the federal Court of Appeals in Washington, DC. A three-judge panel at the Court of Appeals ruled on December 7, 2010 that the lower court was correct. It held that because the NJOY e-cigarettes are not marketed as tobacco cessation aids (such as nicotine gum or patches), the FDA does not have authority over e-cigarettes as a drug or drug delivery device.
The courts decision limits the FDAs ability to test NJOY e-cigarettes for safety and prohibits it from banning e-cigarettes entirely. However, the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act (Tobacco Control Act) expressly allows state and local governments to regulate the sale or use of tobacco products, which would include e-cigarettes.[3]
The courts decision limits the FDAs ability to test NJOY e-cigarettes for safety and prohibits it from banning e-cigarettes entirely. However, the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act (Tobacco Control Act) expressly allows state and local governments to regulate the sale or use of tobacco products, which would include e-cigarettes.[3]
With that in mind, I think states were forced to regulate the product along the same lines as tobacco (since it could not be regulated as a drug) that contains the addictive properties of nicotine.
Most e-cigs are made in China and the safety is so unregulated that several countries incluing liberal old Australia has banned them completely.
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-2129550/Safety-fears-electronic-cigarettes-unclean-unregulated.html#ixzz2PVYuP9Rj
A lack of regulation has led several countries, including Canada, Australia, and Singapore to ban the products because of fears over possible side-effects.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
191 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The manufacturers sued the govt. for the right to be classified as a tobacco product.
pnwmom
Apr 2013
#164
A lightly scented deodorant, hell, baby powder smells stronger than an e-cig, seriously. And I hope
Mnemosyne
Apr 2013
#189
No, the people not considering them a health hazard actually have an idea of what nicotine's LD50 is
jeff47
Apr 2013
#17
perfectly reasonable - you suck in nicotine then blow it back out...poisons everyone around you nt
msongs
Apr 2013
#7
And multiple studies failed to find ANYTHING harmful to bystanders from the exhaled vapor.
Lizzie Poppet
Apr 2013
#16
If heroine were legal, I still wouldn't want to see people shooting up in the park
bhikkhu
Apr 2013
#108
I think the existing level of regulation and restriction of cigarettes is adequate
bhikkhu
Apr 2013
#160
Of course they did, they learned that if you can call them cigs, you can tax them like cigs. n/t
hughee99
Apr 2013
#150
Interesting because all my nonsmoking friends say they can't smell anything when I smoke them.
Luminous Animal
Apr 2013
#65
Authoritarian is authoritarian. Left/Right isn't really significant in the way you are thinking
TheKentuckian
Apr 2013
#85
I've been evaping for years. I used it to quit smoking. I don't even use nicotine any longer, just
OregonBlue
Apr 2013
#88
You got spanked by everyone for the ignorant statement you made in #6
DisgustipatedinCA
Apr 2013
#109
stick to facts and not straw man arguments full of projection and you will not be called out on it.
TeamPooka
Apr 2013
#148
The one thing that actually helps me smoke less will become unaffordable. The result, for me will
robinlynne
Apr 2013
#132
E-cigs must be regulated as tobacco products because the manufacturers won a lawsuit
pnwmom
Apr 2013
#165
Okay, whatever. I don't actually care enough about this to research and post links.
Matariki
Apr 2013
#177
For you, as a smoker, the benefits outweigh the risks. You will clearly be exposed
pnwmom
Apr 2013
#184