Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

In reply to the discussion: A sad gun nut reality [View all]
 

pintobean

(18,101 posts)
32. Yes, someone did something stupid
Thu Apr 4, 2013, 11:34 AM
Apr 2013

and it gives us all the right to follow suit. It's exploitation every step of the way. What if this was a child that you loved and a babysitter posted that picture thinking it would funny? Would that make you any more sensitive?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

A sad gun nut reality [View all] MichaelSoE Apr 2013 OP
That is sad TxDemChem Apr 2013 #1
For too many RW gun weirdos, their gun is more important in their life than their own children. baldguy Apr 2013 #2
Gun weirdos and nuts of all kinds: gun nuttery is one area where big "P" politics doesn't matter alcibiades_mystery Apr 2013 #5
why "RW"? seems to me from posts here this also applies to gunners of both sides DrDan Apr 2013 #27
I think they see gun ownership as a way to protect their families. ZombieHorde Apr 2013 #54
If that little girl ever hurts or kills someone with that gun AndyA Apr 2013 #3
"instilling such an interest" Nuclear Unicorn Apr 2013 #10
Much less severely. EOTE Apr 2013 #15
No. My SIL went shooting with us this past weekend and it wasn't her first time. Nuclear Unicorn Apr 2013 #20
Are you aware that having a gun in the house makes it far more likely EOTE Apr 2013 #25
It looks like it's a staged photo, so that leads me to believe the "idiot" is Nuclear Unicorn Apr 2013 #37
It's staged because it's more convenient for you to believe that? EOTE Apr 2013 #39
Or it's not staged because it'smore convenient for you to believe that. Nuclear Unicorn Apr 2013 #40
So, ignore facts and then accuse the OP of being a fake. EOTE Apr 2013 #41
That's why I'm a proponent of gun safety education Nuclear Unicorn Apr 2013 #42
Let me tell you this for the hundredth time or so. Listen up. EOTE Apr 2013 #43
And my husband, FIL and myself set a good example for my SIL on gun safety Nuclear Unicorn Apr 2013 #46
Uhhh, you were the one peddling photos, not me. EOTE Apr 2013 #48
It's telling how you work so strenuously to make "gun nut" equal all gun owners Nuclear Unicorn Apr 2013 #50
I think "gun nuts" are the parents who let their children handle guns. EOTE Apr 2013 #52
My SIL is well-instructed in "leave the room and find an adult" Nuclear Unicorn Apr 2013 #57
If you haven't seen any gun nuts on DU, then you haven't been paying attention. EOTE Apr 2013 #58
For someone who pretends to be worried about reckless and hostile people Nuclear Unicorn Apr 2013 #62
Yeah, awful me, hurting those gun nuts' little feelings. EOTE Apr 2013 #66
oh really - a poll on DU2 showed a half-dozen or so (minimum) who believe in NO control over guns DrDan Apr 2013 #61
I call shenanigans. Nuclear Unicorn Apr 2013 #63
Easier than putting some thought into it, I suppose. EOTE Apr 2013 #69
A posters interpretation of an unscientific poll on a closed forum? Nuclear Unicorn Apr 2013 #70
You said you don't believe it. EOTE Apr 2013 #72
of course you do - just like the validity of the picture DrDan Apr 2013 #82
It's your subjective interpretation of an unscientific poll on a closed forum. Nuclear Unicorn Apr 2013 #91
typical denial - do you happen to have a pitbull also? DrDan Apr 2013 #92
What I don't have is a link to a poll from DU2. Nuclear Unicorn Apr 2013 #94
now you do DrDan Apr 2013 #104
Would it make you feel more confident if I said I do not place myself amongst Nuclear Unicorn Apr 2013 #106
we are in agreement DrDan Apr 2013 #107
So am I a gun nut then? sarisataka Apr 2013 #65
Do you match any of the criteria I provided? My words are there for you to see. EOTE Apr 2013 #67
You have several criteria... sarisataka Apr 2013 #71
Education is fine, just don't let kids handle guns. EOTE Apr 2013 #73
May I assume you are against guns? sarisataka Apr 2013 #77
Sure, the risk will NEVER be zero. EOTE Apr 2013 #80
"develop a conscience" pintobean Apr 2013 #44
Some people care more for their guns than they do the lives of their children. EOTE Apr 2013 #45
Some people care more for their alcohol than they do the lives of their children. Nuclear Unicorn Apr 2013 #47
Yeah, that's pretty sick in all cases. EOTE Apr 2013 #49
So now you're judging by action rather than characteristic Nuclear Unicorn Apr 2013 #53
No shit, there are actions and characteristics which are unsafe for children. EOTE Apr 2013 #55
How would a capacity limit have saved any lives in an accidental discharge? Nuclear Unicorn Apr 2013 #64
Why is "accidental discharge" the only criteria you're looking at? EOTE Apr 2013 #68
"Why is "accidental discharge" the only criteria you're looking at?" Nuclear Unicorn Apr 2013 #74
The magazine capacity issue is obviously not meant to address accidental discharges. EOTE Apr 2013 #75
You're the one who spent most if the time complaining about guns in the home Nuclear Unicorn Apr 2013 #78
Christ, there are a multitude of issues, do you not really understand that? EOTE Apr 2013 #81
A magazine limit wouldn't have helped ANY tragedy or so few as to be Nuclear Unicorn Apr 2013 #84
Are you fucking kidding me? Lanza fire 150+ shots! EOTE Apr 2013 #86
Maybe you should learn to lead from the front Nuclear Unicorn Apr 2013 #88
So you're going to change the topic once again? EOTE Apr 2013 #90
No, that is the topic, by your own declaration: a callous disregard for other people Nuclear Unicorn Apr 2013 #93
I treat inferior arguments as inferior. EOTE Apr 2013 #95
You call people "stupid" and "cultists" and "nutters" for pointing out something is Nuclear Unicorn Apr 2013 #96
I call nutters nutters because they care more about their toys than they do lives. EOTE Apr 2013 #97
"You think that limiting magazine capacity is pointless, but the facts say that it will save lives." Nuclear Unicorn Apr 2013 #99
In Newtown it could have saved the bulk of them. EOTE Apr 2013 #100
"The bulk of them"? Nuclear Unicorn Apr 2013 #101
He fired 150+ rounds! EOTE Apr 2013 #102
152 rounds in (roughly) 5.5 minutes Nuclear Unicorn Apr 2013 #103
6 kids escaped just while he jammed. EOTE Apr 2013 #105
In other words, you made shit up to fit your worldview DisgustipatedinCA Apr 2013 #89
I posted examples of staged and non-staged photos, so I have a reasonable supposition Nuclear Unicorn Apr 2013 #98
I wonder if Nancy Lanza would have said the same thing - he's "pretty well-versed DrDan Apr 2013 #26
But those kids have incredible knowledge of guns when they die before reaching their teens. EOTE Apr 2013 #29
Are you seriously equating every gun owner with Nancy Lanza? Nuclear Unicorn Apr 2013 #33
are you saying there are not other gun owners, like Nancy Lanza, who put lives of others at risk DrDan Apr 2013 #56
It's not my broad brush, it's yours. Nuclear Unicorn Apr 2013 #60
I never made the claim that all owners were like Nancy Lanza - you made that leap DrDan Apr 2013 #83
The why did you compare the safety and education prvoided to my SIL Nuclear Unicorn Apr 2013 #85
not at all - and I never did as claimed - my point was DrDan Apr 2013 #87
Yeah, because you can kill people with a movie, a cartoon and fingers in the shape of an "L". Aristus Apr 2013 #23
I was replying to the statement "instilling an interest" Nuclear Unicorn Apr 2013 #31
Heartbreaking Politicub Apr 2013 #4
So sad mgardener Apr 2013 #6
Just to clarify MichaelSoE Apr 2013 #12
Nice idea - but, in the nicest way I can suggest this, fix the text - its frustrating. jmg257 Apr 2013 #17
doh ... i'm on it ... also missed a comma ... brb MichaelSoE Apr 2013 #18
Can you specify where you got the pic? pintobean Apr 2013 #19
Just a search on google images "toddler with gun" MichaelSoE Apr 2013 #24
So, you just pulled a child's picture off the internet pintobean Apr 2013 #28
It's already on the internet. EOTE Apr 2013 #30
Yes, someone did something stupid pintobean Apr 2013 #32
If it was a child I loved, he/she wouldn't have had a gun in the first place. EOTE Apr 2013 #34
Follow the links... sarisataka Apr 2013 #35
TinEye takes it to a Russian site pintobean Apr 2013 #36
Yes, and that's the youngest looking 5 yr old I've ever seen. JimDandy Apr 2013 #16
I was thinking the same thing! Lol! I have certain (not worth $$ skills) IdaBriggs Apr 2013 #76
It's just a big joke to most gun nuts! mercymechap Apr 2013 #7
And the likelihood of that actually happening SheilaT Apr 2013 #8
Not all gun owners are The Wizard Apr 2013 #9
This is a powerful anti gun message! mountain grammy Apr 2013 #11
Note in the upper left the chin of the adult supposedly supervising her. Note finger on the trigger. Bernardo de La Paz Apr 2013 #13
When I was a kid I saw my dad's colt .38 and even handled it NightWatcher Apr 2013 #14
Miko Andres Fla_Democrat Apr 2013 #21
I hope that is photoshopped. If not it is child abuse. yellowcanine Apr 2013 #22
This message was self-deleted by its author devilgrrl Apr 2013 #38
If only OUR children had such a healthy respect for the 2nd amendment. EOTE Apr 2013 #51
"Ginning Up Fear" Life Long Dem Apr 2013 #59
That little girl should be placed into custody of child protective services Cali_Democrat Apr 2013 #79
not commenting on this photo Niceguy1 Apr 2013 #108
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»A sad gun nut reality»Reply #32