Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DrDan

(20,411 posts)
21. this precedent was set by William Aramony of the United Way in the 90's
Fri Feb 3, 2012, 10:16 AM
Feb 2012

"In 1990, there were UWA office rumors about Aramony's liaisons with a teenage girlfriend on vacations in Paris, London and Cairo. An anonymous note on UWA letterhead was sent in late 1990 to UWA's chairman, Edward A. Brennan, who is the chairman of Sears, Roebuck & Company. The letter alleged that the charity was being looted by its president, who was romancing a young woman.

When Aramony was questioned about the allegations, he denied any wrongdoing. His divorce became final in 1991.[5] Late that year, a source at the national office revealed that Aramony flew first class, sometimes on the Concorde, used chauffeur-driven town cars and alleged that he had lavished expensive gifts on friends.[10] After receiving multiple requests for information from the media, the United Way of America's board of governors hired outside investigators in December, 1991. The auditors were instructed to review the books and examine accounting procedures within the agency. According to The Washington Post, their investigation "found sloppy record-keeping, inattention to detail, and accounting problems," but no direct "evidence that Aramony had enriched himself". In fact, all of Aramony's travel expenses were supposed to be reviewed before approval by the United Way's board of directors, whose chairman was Robert E. Allen, then the CEO of AT&T. The auditor's biggest criticism was that documentation was lacking to distinguish business expenditures from personal charges. The outrage from local United Way organizations across the country was overwhelming. Scores of offices disaffiliated themselves and/or discontinued their 1% "contribution" of dues to the national office.[10][14]

During a teleconference on February 27, 1992, Aramony announced his retirement with full pension benefits as soon as a successor was chosen. Until then, he would continue to receive his $390,000 salary and $73,000 in other compensation. When Jay R. Smith, publisher of The Atlanta Journal-Constitution and an active volunteer at United Way of Atlanta asked Aramony if he felt that they were not owed an apology, Aramony said:

Well, Jay, you absolutely are. I do apologize for any problems that my lack of sensitivity to perceptions has caused this movement. I do it happily and gladly to you and everyone else. I would never do anything at all that hurt local United Ways, the mission or the people we serve.

The following day, after an avalanche of calls from local chapters demanding his ouster, Senior vice president Alan S. Cooper was named acting president.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Aramony

****************************************************************


salary of $390K plus $73K in other compensation - and this was 20 years ago

I was working for AT&T at the time - and we were EXPECTED to give our "fair share" via payroll deduction because of Bob Allen's position with the Board of Directors. That quickly changed after this scandal.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

No. Scuba Feb 2012 #1
Unless of course Ichingcarpenter Feb 2012 #11
That's outragous! I understand and know that CEO of non-profits need to make a salary because Justice wanted Feb 2012 #2
Ha... JSnuffy Feb 2012 #5
Were we ever so naive as to believe that people would work for a charity not to get into the WCGreen Feb 2012 #57
Her compensation is almost as much as the aid package to Planned Parenthhod. geckosfeet Feb 2012 #3
damn eShirl Feb 2012 #6
A most noteworthy tidbit. Thanks. Scuba Feb 2012 #13
Hell no they shouldn't be getting that kind of money. It's disgusting and Ecumenist Feb 2012 #4
Not only NO but HELL NO! hobbit709 Feb 2012 #7
No! City Lights Feb 2012 #8
That is how most big non-profits work... They have to put their money somewhere LiberalArkie Feb 2012 #9
Puts her in the top 2% of nonprofit CEOs. Robb Feb 2012 #10
Thanks for this graph RockaFowler Feb 2012 #23
Evert penny they earn takes away from someone who really needs it RegieRocker Feb 2012 #12
People can't work for free Sanity Claws Feb 2012 #14
Obviously you have never donated your time at a soup kitchen, food pantry etc. RegieRocker Feb 2012 #25
Excuse me! You have jumped to a conclusion without any foundation. Sanity Claws Feb 2012 #53
Like this? RegieRocker Feb 2012 #64
to keep perspective handmade34 Feb 2012 #15
Now you did it... TreasonousBastard Feb 2012 #18
To put in perspective President Obama makes $400,000 annually itsrobert Feb 2012 #24
Come on, 1% shills don't like the whole reality thing...you have to ease it up on them uponit7771 Feb 2012 #29
To be fair... BlueCheese Feb 2012 #45
Their is only 168 hrs in a week and they probably only RegieRocker Feb 2012 #66
She ProSense Feb 2012 #27
don't disagree handmade34 Feb 2012 #34
According to Charity Navigator, she makes $340,498.00. City Lights Feb 2012 #31
thanks handmade34 Feb 2012 #37
Forbes has it over a half million dollars itsrobert Feb 2012 #47
I was talking about Cecile Richards. City Lights Feb 2012 #48
Thanks for posting the charity navigator link BrendaBrick Feb 2012 #52
Thanks for posting that list! City Lights Feb 2012 #54
I noticed that too! BrendaBrick Feb 2012 #61
No Generic Other Feb 2012 #16
Yep, dearly regret it Aerows Feb 2012 #63
That's not a "salary" izquierdista Feb 2012 #17
None? Union dockworkers at Newark make more than that with overtime. TreasonousBastard Feb 2012 #22
With overtime. izquierdista Feb 2012 #33
At least they are actually working Aerows Feb 2012 #60
Exactly!!! RegieRocker Feb 2012 #67
How much should they make? TreasonousBastard Feb 2012 #19
Here's another ProSense Feb 2012 #20
this precedent was set by William Aramony of the United Way in the 90's DrDan Feb 2012 #21
No, and they will regret having the light shined on them from the attention. Safetykitten Feb 2012 #26
CEO my ass Footay Feb 2012 #28
no no no AmandaRuth Feb 2012 #30
NO. aquart Feb 2012 #32
Private organizations shouldn't be the only safety net. We need to increase funding to NIH. yardwork Feb 2012 #35
+1000 handmade34 Feb 2012 #38
Yes they should, HOWEVER, all workers wages should be adjusted upwards to what they should be stevenleser Feb 2012 #36
Conversely laundry_queen Feb 2012 #68
No, but I can understand how it might happen Douglas Carpenter Feb 2012 #39
While I agree that she is getting payed excessively, I think someone making $50,000 Nikia Feb 2012 #42
Absolutely not.... truebrit71 Feb 2012 #40
a related question. mysuzuki2 Feb 2012 #41
No!. n/t arthritisR_US Feb 2012 #43
i have a releative that gives very generously, but has a policy flexnor Feb 2012 #44
That is A LOT of donation money needed Broderick Feb 2012 #46
No- especially as CEO for a non-profit named after (exploiting the name of) her dead sister. nt stlsaxman Feb 2012 #49
In a perfect world non-profit agencies such as this would be unnecessary. hunter Feb 2012 #50
No Vehl Feb 2012 #51
yes and no dembotoz Feb 2012 #55
Of course not, that is horrible. Rex Feb 2012 #56
Simple answer, No n/t Aerows Feb 2012 #58
Our nonprofit hospital CEO makes over 400k... ileus Feb 2012 #59
I run a non profit Dorian Gray Feb 2012 #62
No. ellisonz Feb 2012 #65
No. bhikkhu Feb 2012 #69
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Poll: Should a CEO of a n...»Reply #21