Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: I can't believe I am watching a Democratic president propose serious cuts to Social Security. [View all]noiretextatique
(27,275 posts)14. triangulation is not compromise, it is co-optation
co-opt (k-pt, kpt)
tr.v. co-opt·ed, co-opt·ing, co-opts
1. To elect as a fellow member of a group.
2. To appoint summarily.
3. To take or assume for one's own use; appropriate: co-opted the criticism by embracing it.
4. To neutralize or win over (an independent minority, for example) through assimilation into an established group or culture: co-opt rebels by giving them positions of authority.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
86 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I can't believe I am watching a Democratic president propose serious cuts to Social Security. [View all]
Stinky The Clown
Apr 2013
OP
Not!! Reducing future increases is not "cutting" benefits. No benefit will be less than it is now.
kelliekat44
Apr 2013
#58
If COLA is $50/month, and Medicare goes up $60/month, it goddam fucking well IS a cut! n/t
eridani
Apr 2013
#82
and only a Democrat could have passed mandatory corporate health insurance
green for victory
Apr 2013
#9
Bill Clinton's worst ideas came from triangulation--which is just a fancy word for
Baitball Blogger
Apr 2013
#8
Yes, and compromising requires letting go of principles that impede concession
HereSince1628
Apr 2013
#12
I know how they packaged it to sell it. But I'm not fooled by that anymore.
Baitball Blogger
Apr 2013
#22
A simple look at the man's record and statements would have told you clear back in 2008
duffyduff
Apr 2013
#16
People better inundate Congress members of both parties with emails and letters
duffyduff
Apr 2013
#21
He's not. He's just pretending to drive the car off the cliff to get the kids in the back to behave,
Brickbat
Apr 2013
#43
A bluff makes Obama a dishonest negotiator... that's not a valuable attribute
HereSince1628
Apr 2013
#60
He did say during the campaign that his position on Social Security was similar to Romney's.
Nye Bevan
Apr 2013
#65