Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

premium

(3,731 posts)

4. Thanks for the answer.

Reply to baldguy (Reply #3)

Fri Apr 5, 2013, 12:50 PM

Apr 2013

My definition is someone who feels they have to acquire an arsenal to keep the govt at bay.

someone who thinks that there should be no regulations.

Someone who outright rejects any new measures that might reasonably reduce gun violence.

I fully support the UBC, stiffer penalties for straw purchase's, mag. limit like what CO just enacted, plus the EO's the President Obama enacted.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

11 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Despite gun-control push, more states have cut back on gun regulations since Newtown [View all] hack89 Apr 2013 OP

It's divided the country in that the majority of gun nuts are right wing bigots who use their Hoyt Apr 2013 #1

Define a gun nut. nt. premium Apr 2013 #2

Anyone who looks at the ongoing massacre and still thinks the only solution is more guns. baldguy Apr 2013 #3

Thanks for the answer. premium Apr 2013 #4

Basically people who say things you disagree with and disagrees with you when you say ProgressiveProfessor Apr 2013 #6

Anyone who doesn't use a can a beans for self defense ProgressiveProfessor Apr 2013 #5

FTW! derby378 Apr 2013 #11

Oh, good lord what a cherry-picked number. Robb Apr 2013 #7

This message was self-deleted by its author hack89 Apr 2013 #10

Yahoo News is a right-wing rag. But couldn't expect any less from the OP. nt Comrade_McKenzie Apr 2013 #8

Do you dispute the facts in the post? hack89 Apr 2013 #9