Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Ikonoklast

(23,973 posts)
36. I was going through a divorce at the time, my then-wife thought that calling the police on me
Fri Apr 5, 2013, 02:01 PM
Apr 2013

was a valid tactic to build support for her position going into proceedings.

For any reason, no reason, made-up reasons, they police were called to my residence thirty-five times by her. Not once was I arrested, not once was I cited for anything, not once did they even really do anything but tell me that I had to leave my own residence because "the woman usually gets the house in deals like this anyways."

I was told by my attorneys to not leave the residence or my children for any reason, no matter what.

I wasn't about to.

She opened my gun safe by taking the keys from me while I was sleeping, and called the police the next day to come get them.

No restraining order was issued, nothing was adjudicated whatsoever, they just came to my house when I was at work and not only took my property, but also firearms that belonged to other people, not owned by me, that I kept for them in my safe.

They took the 1863 Colt's musket that hung over my fireplace, it belonged to my father but was given to me to display, when I saw it missing the next day I checked the gun safe, saw the door left open, and knew what she had done.

Now, this is after a previous court order was issued keeping either of us from disposing of any property in any way until after the divorce was finalized, or ordered to by the court.

Fairly standard order in a contested divorce case.


The PD chief refused to acknowledge what they had even done, refused to give me an inventory of what they had confiscated, refused to do anything without a court order.

Everyone that was involved in losing property without due process filed a police report for theft, and informed their insurance companies.

I got a court order, all right.

So did the others individuals involved.

So did the insurance companies.

The PD still stalled returning everything until the court sent a county bailiff along with a Sheriff's deputy to the local police department with a summons and served them with it.

There was one pistol one of the police officers wanted, and wanted badly. It was held back for him because the PD said I could not prove ownership, although I produced the original bill of sale (which I have for every firearm I own, along with copies kept elsewhere), the original box it came in, and pictures and serial numbers photographically recorded of each item for insurance purposes.

Even when finally handing it over to me, the PD chief asked me if I wanted to sell it, the shithead.

The judge was not very happy with his previous orders to return everything being ignored by the PD.

He was *not* happy at all.

The upshot was, without any valid reason whatsoever the police department had taken sides during an ongoing civil legal matter, involved themselves with no reason to, and ended up getting into a disastrous situation of their own making.

Soon after this happened, the court served my ex with a order to vacate the premises, to leave immediately.



After ever thing was said and done, sole custody of my three children was given to me, as was the house, everything in it, and all the vehicles except one.











Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Because Faux "news" keeps telling them that is whats going to happen Drale Apr 2013 #1
Why do they say that? It's propaganda. Goebbels's Big Lie. nt patrice Apr 2013 #2
I find it best to ask one simple question before engaging in conversation with a GOPer: LVdem Apr 2013 #3
Just a quick question - LibertyLover Apr 2013 #40
No he hasn't... LVdem Apr 2013 #45
Because the bunker mentality sells weapons & ammo? DirkGently Apr 2013 #4
It's The Lie NRA perpetuates because they know Cha Apr 2013 #5
Wishful thinking. Scootaloo Apr 2013 #6
Makes sense. They're acting out a "brave" fantasy because they know... Beartracks Apr 2013 #10
Plant the lie... defacto7 Apr 2013 #7
They did it to me. Ikonoklast Apr 2013 #8
Really? SheilaT Apr 2013 #9
So we have nothing to worry about. safeinOhio Apr 2013 #16
And where did I assert that as the reason for my ownership of firearms? Ikonoklast Apr 2013 #37
What prompted them to do such a thing? nt Javaman Apr 2013 #24
Curious as to what they said their reason was Marrah_G Apr 2013 #26
I was going through a divorce at the time, my then-wife thought that calling the police on me Ikonoklast Apr 2013 #36
Sounds like an awful ordeal Marrah_G Apr 2013 #38
It was a very rough time for all of us. Ikonoklast Apr 2013 #41
the PD erred on the side of caution maxsolomon Apr 2013 #49
PD acted unlawfully with no basis for what they did. Ikonoklast Apr 2013 #54
so, you got them back - did you miss a hunting trip in the interim or something? maxsolomon Apr 2013 #64
Cool story, bro'. Please proceed. LanternWaste Apr 2013 #39
I really don't care if you believe me or not. It is, in fact, a matter of public record. Ikonoklast Apr 2013 #43
Doesn't it feel really cool to be all-knowing? DollarBillHines Apr 2013 #51
It happened after Katrina Mojorabbit Apr 2013 #11
Yeah, the president ordered that jmowreader Apr 2013 #15
Uh, no, premium Apr 2013 #22
I believe a local authority ordered it. Mojorabbit Apr 2013 #48
Divide and conquer then attack from the rear Herlong Apr 2013 #12
Way too many simpletons jambo101 Apr 2013 #13
What I find funny is Republicans grab their guns in fear of black home invaders,... Spitfire of ATJ Apr 2013 #14
You will ban guns to save 300 lives but not to save 30,000 lives? hack89 Apr 2013 #17
So you must agree that we need more stringent controls on handguns. Right? baldguy Apr 2013 #20
Just asking for a honest discussion hack89 Apr 2013 #21
Wouldn't capacity limits have an affect on SA handguns? jmg257 Apr 2013 #23
Technically yes. Realistically no hack89 Apr 2013 #25
A law like the SAFE Act in NY mandated that (just about) all mags with greater capacity then jmg257 Apr 2013 #27
It would not reduce gun deaths in any meaningful manner hack89 Apr 2013 #28
Of course criminals don't obey laws. But does that mean we remove the jmg257 Apr 2013 #29
You are missing the point of my original question hack89 Apr 2013 #30
I answered that. I pointed out that your point was flawed because "banning guns", jmg257 Apr 2013 #31
So how do magazine limits reduce suicides and typical murders? hack89 Apr 2013 #32
Again- I already answered that: jmg257 Apr 2013 #33
Those laws would be effective and I can support with the exception of registration hack89 Apr 2013 #34
Are you sure? I do not believe that to be the case. Donald Ian Rankin Apr 2013 #47
About 20,000 suicides a year - our suicide rate is nearly 3 time our murder rate. hack89 Apr 2013 #50
This message was self-deleted by its author Heidi Apr 2013 #18
Because they're paranoid losers leftynyc Apr 2013 #19
Because the gun lovers leave out the other part of the story like no_hypocrisy Apr 2013 #35
they will only grab the guns if someone is growing marijuana too. TeamPooka Apr 2013 #42
Capital letters on the STUPID. n/t Cleita Apr 2013 #44
It would be a good thing if it did. Donald Ian Rankin Apr 2013 #46
Yours is the honest approach hack89 Apr 2013 #53
May be honest, but extreme RobertEarl Apr 2013 #56
"It has been proven that controls work"? I do not believe that to be the case. Donald Ian Rankin Apr 2013 #57
Lets discuss banning guns hack89 Apr 2013 #58
This message was self-deleted by its author jmg257 Apr 2013 #59
So why are cities like Chicago fighting so desperately to keep their bans? hack89 Apr 2013 #61
Sorry Hack, darn iPad is multiple posting again... nt jmg257 Apr 2013 #62
Maybe get A new constitutional amendment...then you know you have the true support jmg257 Apr 2013 #63
An iron clad guarantee? Like the 2nd and Heller & McDonald? jmg257 Apr 2013 #60
There is something drastically wrong in America when... Life Long Dem Apr 2013 #52
Because first they need to find he has a joint on him. krispos42 Apr 2013 #55
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»They Just Grabbed My Neig...»Reply #36