Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

unblock

(56,206 posts)
11. Yes, it is a bit indirect.
Fri Apr 5, 2013, 04:22 PM
Apr 2013

Social security is indeed self-funded, so federal budget savings don't directly pertain to the social security budget. However, if the 401(k) tax breaks were abolished, more people would look to social security to find their retirement, which would lead to a demand for better social security benefits.

In fact, it probably would have to be done as a package deal.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Is this proposing confisc...»Reply #11