Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Summer Hathaway

(2,770 posts)
34. And as we all know
Fri Apr 5, 2013, 07:17 PM
Apr 2013

if someone posted that women are selfish, women are gold-diggers, women are into S&M, women are untrustworthy without using qualifiers such as "a few" women, or "some" women, you wouldn't react to it, because you would accept that the OP was more important than your being offended.

There is no need for anyone to "trot out some puppet women" in order to demonstrate disagreement with you. There have been many women on this site who have consistently voiced that disagreement of their own accord, and will continue to do so.

You (and your colleagues) have been told repeatedly, in no uncertain terms, that your view of how women should conduct themselves and their relationships with men is NOT accepted by all women, nor is that view reflective of the goals of true feminism.

But rather than acknowledge and accept that disagreement being voiced by many women here, you instead dive into the deep end of the delusion pool, and come up with some BS about how those who disagree with you are merely "puppet women" who have been "trotted out" for the sole purpose of ridiculing you and your cohorts.

Where is your proof that there are "puppet women" in play here? Where are the facts to back up that assertion?

You have no such facts, just as you have no facts to support most of what you say here on a daily basis.

And while we're on the subject of facts, you might also consider the fact that there ARE some women who form part of the 'self-proclaimed feminists' contingent that DO become outraged on a consistent basis, and who DO hate men. Note that I said some women because I, unlike you, believe it important to qualify such statements when they are not meant to be taken as applicable to all.

Furthermore, I am basing my assessment of such women on their own words and the opinions they have expressed, and NOT on the skewed notion that ALL women are easily outraged man-haters, in the way that many of your colleagues promote the idea that ALL men do and/or say XYZ.

I have read some very eye-opening discussions in HoF of late, and often see posts about leaving DU because your group is so ill-treated here. I would imagine that the reason none of you ever do leave is because you've investigated other sites that you could potentially move to, and have realized that your brand of "feminism" wouldn't be any more widely accepted elsewhere than it is here.

Now, you can go ahead and debate everything I have said here. But as you do so, please be aware that the minute you stated that "they trot out some puppet women who will agree with every hateful thing they say about feminists, and say 'See, even women disagree with you'," you had already lost the argument.













Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Absolutely Kalidurga Apr 2013 #1
the "all men" thing is what they use to derail any feminist leaning conversations they don't like... bettyellen Apr 2013 #2
That depressing I've yet to meet feminists any where in real life or here Arcanetrance Apr 2013 #3
Well, you missed iverglas by a few months. Dr. Strange Apr 2013 #4
Oh God, I remember iverglas LittleBlue Apr 2013 #5
My vote is with the "everyone" thing etherealtruth Apr 2013 #13
Yes, she did. Jamastiene Apr 2013 #28
I was wondering where she went madville Apr 2013 #80
Yes, she was Canadian. Dr. Strange Apr 2013 #87
That's funny. Go to Eugene Oregon and find hundreds. cliffordu Apr 2013 #29
I hear they also have a huge problem with white supremecists and serial killers! bettyellen Apr 2013 #36
Oregon. It's a whole 'nother planet. cliffordu Apr 2013 #37
i grew up in the So Bx, and frankly, that shit scares me!! bettyellen Apr 2013 #39
Not many White supremacists in my neck of the woods. cliffordu Apr 2013 #56
sorry I am doing the Vt/NH thing... LOL I'm not scared of Portland because I have Swag and Heather bettyellen Apr 2013 #58
I wondered why there were so many killers in Washington state treestar Apr 2013 #86
Really? polly7 Apr 2013 #10
I don't have to, Pol. It will become obvious to Arcane soon enough who the feminst attck squad are. bettyellen Apr 2013 #11
Post removed Post removed Apr 2013 #12
Authoritarian? You sound very confused, Pol. And baiting someone into breaking the rules is really bettyellen Apr 2013 #15
You said there were women here who only speak out because they're 'puppets'. polly7 Apr 2013 #18
You weren't aware that there are plenty of socks here? Well then, I AM educating you. ;-) bettyellen Apr 2013 #20
Your vitriol diminishes anything you might want to express etherealtruth Apr 2013 #27
Accusing people of "derailing" conversations seems a bit odd. Comrade Grumpy Apr 2013 #24
derailing has nothing to do with "authoritarianism". threads are expected to stay on topic bettyellen Apr 2013 #26
And as we all know Summer Hathaway Apr 2013 #34
you seem to be confused, as I was stating what happens to when OTHER people post OPs, not myself bettyellen Apr 2013 #38
No, sweetie Summer Hathaway Apr 2013 #43
I am not your Sweetie, SH. Pls stop this rude phony nice crap Observations are not orders- there bettyellen Apr 2013 #44
I believe your response Summer Hathaway Apr 2013 #48
I guess you have me confused with some fool who is willing to fetch for you, . bettyellen Apr 2013 #54
Again your reading comprehension Summer Hathaway Apr 2013 #55
I have absolutely no concerns about whether good DUers believe the veracity of my statements here. bettyellen Apr 2013 #62
In other words Summer Hathaway Apr 2013 #66
luckily, people around here aren't half as stupid as you imagine them to be. bettyellen Apr 2013 #70
This appears to be a private argument, not discussion. juajen Apr 2013 #85
This is not an argument Summer Hathaway Apr 2013 #89
I'm not a part of any group Dorian Gray Apr 2013 #82
Well written and spot on! Thank you! Vinnie From Indy Apr 2013 #76
Well stated. (n/t) MadrasT Apr 2013 #45
I'm pretty sure this all started when one woman decided to try to explain redqueen Apr 2013 #6
See the article is perfectly well reasoned and thought out Arcanetrance Apr 2013 #7
Yep, just more fake outrage. Same as with the 'holding doors open' idiocy. nt redqueen Apr 2013 #8
about a half dozen people here pretend they don't understand that.... even when it;s been explained bettyellen Apr 2013 #9
I wish they'd quit they're purposely dividing us at a time when we need to be united Arcanetrance Apr 2013 #14
sometimes patriarchy over rides our democratic beliefs. that is all. nt seabeyond Apr 2013 #16
Well.... cliffordu Apr 2013 #32
I have to admit that I think that way. smirkymonkey Apr 2013 #33
I won't accept any help from men I don't know. alarimer Apr 2013 #61
i havent seen any without the word "potential" in the mix so i have to agree nt SwampG8r Apr 2013 #17
Really your gonna go that route and mock this cause I missed a word Arcanetrance Apr 2013 #19
i apologize if it came across like that SwampG8r Apr 2013 #21
I apologize to you as well Arcanetrance Apr 2013 #22
wow, I am impressed! bettyellen Apr 2013 #41
That's cuz no one said that! Texasgal Apr 2013 #23
It's an extremely misunderstood point here. Nobody is saying all men are rapists. Dash87 Apr 2013 #25
It isn't misunderstood.. haikugal Apr 2013 #30
Yeppers, this crap is spammed all over the net, and there is no misunderstanding bettyellen Apr 2013 #40
I won't challenge that assertion Shankapotomus Apr 2013 #31
Or we could simply work more on equal rights for all. randome Apr 2013 #57
If the assertion is Shankapotomus Apr 2013 #60
No, but de-evolving or gene pool manipulations sound very time-consuming. randome Apr 2013 #63
Certainly more power to you Shankapotomus Apr 2013 #67
Let's review, again, the meaning of the phrase. This has been said many times before Squinch Apr 2013 #68
Who knew? Turns out we have ALL the power! All women need to do is stop those pesky wars! Squinch Apr 2013 #59
Not at all Shankapotomus Apr 2013 #64
If your saying my post says all men are potential rapists I'm afraid you missed the point. Arcanetrance Apr 2013 #69
Thanks for this. nt redqueen Apr 2013 #77
Because we expect more - and believe men are capable of more. KitSileya Apr 2013 #71
No argument there Shankapotomus Apr 2013 #73
If you REALLY want to understand what the problem is between Squinch Apr 2013 #74
Thanks for such a good response Shankapotomus Apr 2013 #75
Women are subject to the same stresses and variety as men. Squinch Apr 2013 #78
Awsome response. Shankapotomus Apr 2013 #81
Thank you for saying so! Squinch Apr 2013 #88
When a woman is involved in a relationship with a man, it is not a "reward". redqueen Apr 2013 #79
As I responded to Squinch, Shankapotomus Apr 2013 #83
It's common sense. Something sorely lacking in many discussions nt geek tragedy Apr 2013 #35
Every DUer could potentially write "all men are rapists." aikoaiko Apr 2013 #42
because a random selection of the keyboard BainsBane Apr 2013 #52
The thread was hidden. baldguy Apr 2013 #46
This message was self-deleted by its author Arcanetrance Apr 2013 #47
Only men that women don't find attractive are considered creepy and rapey... Comrade_McKenzie Apr 2013 #49
what? BainsBane Apr 2013 #50
That's a load of crap about woman considering only the unattractive creepy and rapey Arcanetrance Apr 2013 #51
no, you have to BEHAVE creepy to get a rap as a creeper bettyellen Apr 2013 #72
"Potential" just means it's possible. Deep13 Apr 2013 #53
I'm a Feminist, and I love Men AnnieBW Apr 2013 #65
I am an ardent feminist etherealtruth Apr 2013 #84
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I know I've only been her...»Reply #34