General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: How Karl Rove fixed the FBI investigation of his theft of the 2004 Presidential election in Ohio [View all]Cliff Arnebeck
(305 posts)Thanks, Octafish.
It's a small world after all. Carl Bernstein was my high school classmate at Montgomery Blair in Silver Spring, Maryland. Danny Sheehan was in my first year section and class at Harvard Law. Caylor had investigated the assassination of Federal Appeals Judge Robert Vance, but did not know the motive for the assassination, until I told him of my conversation with Danny Sheehan in which Danny told me that assassination was how he lost his appeal of a plainly erroneous District Court RICO decision in Miami.
I had experience with corporate network censorship of the political/legal news--again guided by the skillful hand of Carl Rove from the White House. It involved our successful litigation in Ohio against the U.S. Chamber of Commerce's "War on Judges," (so described on the cover of Forbes Magazine).
Are you suggesting, by directing me to the excellent piece on ABC/Capital Cities, that "Scandal" may be setting up Karl Rove to take the fall for the theft of the 2004 Presidential election in Ohio, in a limited hang out designed to protect the Mark Fuller et al. Enterprise and the multi-year, multi-state, systemic red shifting of our elections--most importantly the 2010 election that fraudulently empowered Republicans in Congress and the states? They are telling only a part of the truth--not the whole truth. I was interpreting it as the exercise of dramatic license, for simplification and general comprehensibility, rather than an intelligence fix.