Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

cali

(114,904 posts)
19. yes to both
Sat Apr 6, 2013, 07:07 AM
Apr 2013

President Obama opposes over the counter dispensing of the morning after pill to girls under 17 and yes, it took a judge to force the issue.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Well how about that! JustAnotherGen Apr 2013 #1
thank goodness for some sense niyad Apr 2013 #2
Now how many years before it actually happens? Sekhmets Daughter Apr 2013 #3
This will be in litigation forever BillStein Apr 2013 #4
Shame that it takes a judge to tell a Dem Admin to do this. nm rhett o rick Apr 2013 #5
It was ProSense Apr 2013 #6
Do you favor the ruling? nm rhett o rick Apr 2013 #8
What does that have to do with anything? ProSense Apr 2013 #10
Ok, fair enough. Why was the FDA restricting the over the counter sales? rhett o rick Apr 2013 #11
Sebelius was terrified of the political fallout if she OK'd OTC sales. That took precedence over MotherPetrie Apr 2013 #27
She was another bad choice for Pres Obama. nm rhett o rick Apr 2013 #28
She certainly was... one of many MotherPetrie Apr 2013 #30
Let's try it again. Do you think the Pres is on the correct side of this issue? rhett o rick Apr 2013 #31
I assume silence is a no. nm rhett o rick Apr 2013 #33
You wont answer because the Pres has abondon the 99% and you know it. rhett o rick Apr 2013 #34
K&R idwiyo Apr 2013 #7
K&R BumRushDaShow Apr 2013 #9
Why was the FDA restricting the over the counter sales? Anyone, anyone, Bueller?? nm rhett o rick Apr 2013 #12
This article contains the history of this battle cali Apr 2013 #13
Thank you very much. Never understood why Sebelius got appointed in the first place. rhett o rick Apr 2013 #14
yes to both cali Apr 2013 #19
This message was self-deleted by its author rhett o rick Apr 2013 #22
Sorry I posted in the wrong place then deleted the wrong message. It's early what can I say. rhett o rick Apr 2013 #23
No, not yet. Justice is reportedly reviewing the decision. cali Apr 2013 #24
Posted in wrong place. rhett o rick Apr 2013 #21
More info on this from a previous thread here suffragette Apr 2013 #25
Once again, it's a shame that a judge had to tell a Demo Admin to do the correct thing. nm rhett o rick Apr 2013 #15
good news. I heard on the news this morning that we have double the teenage pregnancies than liberal_at_heart Apr 2013 #16
I don't believe that's true cali Apr 2013 #20
Our rates are low for us but because of our lack of access to birth control they are still far liberal_at_heart Apr 2013 #29
K&R freshwest Apr 2013 #17
Kick Warren DeMontague Apr 2013 #18
Good deal! Reagan appointed, no less opiate69 Apr 2013 #26
The Pres Obama Admin hasnt decided whether they will challenge the judges decision. rhett o rick Apr 2013 #32
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Judge Rules Emergency Con...»Reply #19