Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MineralMan

(150,898 posts)
21. Here's why: Each Congressional Representative has
Sat Apr 6, 2013, 01:28 PM
Apr 2013

between 500,000 and 800,000 people in his or her district. You are one of those. Depending on the district, more or less people will want to communicate with their representative during any given time period. Automated messaging and automatic responses are necessary to deal with the number of communications each receives.

Some people will not be satisfied with those responses. For them, some digging is required to find a better way to communicate. It's a filter. Only those serious enough about actually getting a message through will do the digging. Even then, the numbers are too large for a personal response to every communication by the representative. More filtering is needed to whittle the number down until it is manageable. What filters are used to do that depend on the individual representative. For many, it involves whether the person has contributed or volunteered during the previous campaign. Right or wrong, those are the people the representative doesn't want to piss off.

In this filtering process, lots of computer power is employed. That leads to errors, as always. So, you get a form letter about the wrong subject sometimes, or they have your phone number connected to the wrong address. Stuff happens that way. Much of the filtering is done automatically, using whatever algorithms that are available. Other filtering is done by junior staff members, many of them unpaid interns. What gets by the algorithms and low-level staff gets passed along to more senior staff. Eventually, a certain percentage of the communications actually reach the representative. Some of those get a personal response. Most get a one or two word note, and a staff member sends some appropriate pre-fab letter.

The problem is numbers and time. Half a million or more people to represent and not much time to devote the the task of answering letters and emails. So, there's a system. I can tell you absolutely that quality of content in any communication you send is one of the criteria. If your communication manages to get to the senior staff level, whether the representative sees it or not can depend on how well it is written. And yes, neatness, grammar, spelling, and punctuation count, as they always do.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

LOL. Arctic Dave Apr 2013 #1
That is definitely not so in many cases. MineralMan Apr 2013 #2
A couple of years ago, enlightenment Apr 2013 #9
Different forms of communication are handled differently. MineralMan Apr 2013 #13
i certainly agree with your points... creativebliss Apr 2013 #19
Here's why: Each Congressional Representative has MineralMan Apr 2013 #21
Great Explanation... creativebliss Apr 2013 #29
Thanks. The sheer numbers are daunting. Now, I don't know MineralMan Apr 2013 #30
Great digging! creativebliss Apr 2013 #37
I did some digging, and found some details on the MineralMan Apr 2013 #36
Yes, I'm aware of that. enlightenment Apr 2013 #20
I do not know you, so I write more completely than I might MineralMan Apr 2013 #22
Only slightly annoyed, MM. enlightenment Apr 2013 #23
As if they care what we have to say MindPilot Apr 2013 #3
Actually, they all read some letters and emails. MineralMan Apr 2013 #4
We really need a hyperbole font. I would never _open_ with a line like that! MindPilot Apr 2013 #5
In that case, my post is not directed at you. MineralMan Apr 2013 #6
I use, "Your votes and positions decide my vote." Tierra_y_Libertad Apr 2013 #7
That's excellent. MineralMan Apr 2013 #8
I attempt to remind the pols that this is a democracy and that people have the power. Tierra_y_Libertad Apr 2013 #11
Last time I called my congressman, the person I spoke with told me they'd get back to me - forestpath Apr 2013 #10
Complain about the treatment. MineralMan Apr 2013 #14
Oh, the first time I got the wrong reply I did contact them. forestpath Apr 2013 #16
Keep trying. Persistence pays off. MineralMan Apr 2013 #17
Will keep that in mind. forestpath Apr 2013 #18
Haha classic mineral man whatchamacallit Apr 2013 #12
Thanks. I'm always trying to help people make a difference. MineralMan Apr 2013 #15
''An envelope with $100,000 in cash will be left in your name at the Hilton in Arlington...'' Octafish Apr 2013 #24
get your hands up against the wall and spread your legs datasuspect Apr 2013 #25
Try: "And my friend Ulysses S Grant agrees!" demwing Apr 2013 #26
The word, "donation" and the phrase, "credit card number" will catch their attention Jamastiene Apr 2013 #27
+1 deutsey Apr 2013 #31
If you were donating significant amounts of money, you wouldn't say such words HereSince1628 Apr 2013 #32
When i write mercuryblues Apr 2013 #28
If I were a representative receiving vile messages... Comrade_McKenzie Apr 2013 #33
Hello, I am Mr. Smith, executive administrative assistant for koch Industries rustydog Apr 2013 #34
speak softly and carry a big stick? warrior1 Apr 2013 #35
"I live in the district you represent," and "I have always supported you." slackmaster Apr 2013 #38
Good lines. MineralMan Apr 2013 #39
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Which Phrases Are More Ef...»Reply #21