General Discussion

truebluegreen

(9,033 posts)

20. +1000

Reply to forestpath (Reply #7)

Sat Apr 6, 2013, 05:50 PM

Apr 2013

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

50 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

I Guess PBO And The Dems Don't Really Want To Take Back The House In 2014..... [View all] global1 Apr 2013 OP

Uh, that's going to be up to the voters in every congressional MineralMan Apr 2013 #1

If this president touches SS, and if Democrats go along with it, do you need to ask sabrina 1 Apr 2013 #32

OK. All I am asking issues MineralMan Apr 2013 #33

One thing that will guarantee that is if the current Rep votes to cut SS whether s/he is sabrina 1 Apr 2013 #36

But unassailable Democratic majorities strip away their excuses for running from a progressive.... villager Apr 2013 #2

Remember the maneuvering Reid did in 2006? Marr Apr 2013 #19

The LAST thing this White House wants is a veto proof majority in the Senate, bvar22 Apr 2013 #31

I wish I could recommend individual posts. HiPointDem Apr 2013 #34

Bill Clinton is a New Dem (or Third Way if you prefer) Democrat Samantha Apr 2013 #37

Why this will insure the house turns democratic, not the other way around. Simple as ABC 123 graham4anything Apr 2013 #3

It is ALL important. We are not making a choice between the two issues. djean111 Apr 2013 #6

Easily remove all guns and bullets from the streets? Bake Apr 2013 #13

Do you realize how many would die without social security Arcanetrance Apr 2013 #27

So it has to be one or the other? SS or gun control? Autumn Apr 2013 #35

You said remove all guns and bullets from the streets. premium Apr 2013 #41

That would be too awkward, wouldn't it? truebluegreen Apr 2013 #4

"Dim" was a typo, right? Bake Apr 2013 #14

Lighten up. truebluegreen Apr 2013 #17

With the clarification, nah, no prob at all. Bake Apr 2013 #23

We're good then. Thanks. truebluegreen Apr 2013 #24

P.S. sorry for my harsh tone truebluegreen Apr 2013 #26

This issue is not whether chained CPI is a good or bad thing. The issue is ... BlueStreak Apr 2013 #5

+1 forestpath Apr 2013 #8

+2 byeya Apr 2013 #10

+1000000000000000000000000000000000 newfie11 Apr 2013 #30

If you wanted to "Raise the Cap", bvar22 Apr 2013 #38

If Obama cared about winning back the House he wouldn't have done this in the first place. forestpath Apr 2013 #7

+1000 truebluegreen Apr 2013 #20

Look on the bright side.... Moses2SandyKoufax Apr 2013 #9

Yep...and I bet he'll never again utter the word "bipartisan" either. forestpath Apr 2013 #11

Three years from now, Moses2SandyKoufax Apr 2013 #15

So true. forestpath Apr 2013 #16

+1000 truebluegreen Apr 2013 #22

They will try, bvar22 Apr 2013 #39

Or maybe it's just you. nt gulliver Apr 2013 #12

Dems are well aware that they will not win back the House in 2014 alcibiades_mystery Apr 2013 #18

BULLSHIT. That is just defeatist. It is only 14 freaking seats BlueStreak Apr 2013 #28

Pipedreams alcibiades_mystery Apr 2013 #29

Which makes those who sat home in 2010 even more guilty treestar Apr 2013 #43

Any data to back that up? Union Scribe Apr 2013 #44

experience on DU treestar Apr 2013 #46

So no, nothing to back that up. Union Scribe Apr 2013 #47

Don't care, I am simply heading off the present set of identical posts treestar Apr 2013 #49

Impossible. I've been assured here that Obama's offer to cut SS was ingenius politics. Marr Apr 2013 #21

Terrorizing the elderly and disabled is typically considered a grandmaster-level move jsr Apr 2013 #40

We are going to primary any mutha fucka who helps put SS on the table. L0oniX Apr 2013 #25

Did not work in 2010 treestar Apr 2013 #42

No, don't sit out 2014! That simply helps whatever you're 'protesting'. JHB Apr 2013 #45

I Think Obama Does Care About Winning Back The House In 2014..... global1 Apr 2013 #50

A lot of 3rd rails being peed on: SS, gun control. JVS Apr 2013 #48