Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bvar22

(39,909 posts)
39. They will try,
Sun Apr 7, 2013, 10:55 AM
Apr 2013

...but we will know better.

SEE: Arkansas Democratic Primary, 2010

We worked HARD to replace the DINO Blanche Lincoln and give Obama a Pro-LABOR, Pro-Health Care mainstream, Popular Democrat.
The UNIONS and the Grass Roots did EXACTLY what the Party leadership had asked to "give them a Congress that would pass Obama's "liberal" agenda.

When WE started winning, "THEY" came to town with BIG MONEY and steamrolled the grass roots, forever putting an end to the LIE that The Party leadership WANTS are Progressive Majorities in Congress.
The Democratic Party Power Brokers would RATHER have a Pro-Business REPUBLICAN holding a seat in Congress than a Pro-LABOR Democrat.


I KNOW, because I was THERE,
working to give President Obama a "Progressive Majority".
It pissed off everyone when our worst obstruction wasn't the Republicans, or the Union Busting Conservatives.
No.
Our WORST enemy turned our to be the White House and Bill Clinton.


[White House support for Wicked Witch of Arkansas who crowed about killing the Public Option

"The Arkansas primary fight illuminates some unpleasant though vital truths about the Democratic establishment "

"So what did the Democratic Party establishment do when a Senator who allegedly impedes their agenda faced a primary challenger who would be more supportive of that agenda? They engaged in full-scale efforts to support Blanche Lincoln. Bill Clinton traveled to Arkansas to urge loyal Democrats to vote for her, bashing liberal groups for good measure. Obama recorded an ad for Lincoln which, among other things, were used to tell African-American primary voters that they should vote for her because she works for their interests. The entire Party infrastructure lent its support and resources to Lincoln — a Senator who supposedly prevents Democrats from doing all sorts of Wonderful, Progressive Things which they so wish they could do but just don’t have the votes for.

<snip>

What happened in this race also gives the lie to the insufferable excuse we’ve been hearing for the last 18 months from countless Obama defenders: namely, if the Senate doesn’t have 60 votes to pass good legislation, it’s not Obama’s fault because he has no leverage over these conservative Senators. It was always obvious what an absurd joke that claim was; the very idea of The Impotent, Helpless President, presiding over a vast government and party apparatus, was laughable. But now, in light of Arkansas, nobody should ever be willing to utter that again with a straight face. Back when Lincoln was threatening to filibuster health care if it included a public option, the White House could obviously have said to her: if you don’t support a public option, not only will we not support your re-election bid, but we’ll support a primary challenger against you. Obama’s support for Lincoln did not merely help; it was arguably decisive, as The Washington Post documented today:"

<much more>

http://www.salon.com/2010/06/10/lincoln_6/



Ed Schultz on Obama support for Lincoln
http://videocafe.crooksandliars.com/heather/ed-schultz-if-it-wasnt-labor-barack-obama-

It will be a LONG time before the Grass Roots and Organized LABOR forget the betrayal in the Arkansas Democratic Primary, 2010.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Uh, that's going to be up to the voters in every congressional MineralMan Apr 2013 #1
If this president touches SS, and if Democrats go along with it, do you need to ask sabrina 1 Apr 2013 #32
OK. All I am asking issues MineralMan Apr 2013 #33
One thing that will guarantee that is if the current Rep votes to cut SS whether s/he is sabrina 1 Apr 2013 #36
But unassailable Democratic majorities strip away their excuses for running from a progressive.... villager Apr 2013 #2
Remember the maneuvering Reid did in 2006? Marr Apr 2013 #19
The LAST thing this White House wants is a veto proof majority in the Senate, bvar22 Apr 2013 #31
I wish I could recommend individual posts. HiPointDem Apr 2013 #34
Bill Clinton is a New Dem (or Third Way if you prefer) Democrat Samantha Apr 2013 #37
Why this will insure the house turns democratic, not the other way around. Simple as ABC 123 graham4anything Apr 2013 #3
It is ALL important. We are not making a choice between the two issues. djean111 Apr 2013 #6
Easily remove all guns and bullets from the streets? Bake Apr 2013 #13
Do you realize how many would die without social security Arcanetrance Apr 2013 #27
So it has to be one or the other? SS or gun control? Autumn Apr 2013 #35
You said remove all guns and bullets from the streets. premium Apr 2013 #41
That would be too awkward, wouldn't it? truebluegreen Apr 2013 #4
"Dim" was a typo, right? Bake Apr 2013 #14
Lighten up. truebluegreen Apr 2013 #17
With the clarification, nah, no prob at all. Bake Apr 2013 #23
We're good then. Thanks. truebluegreen Apr 2013 #24
P.S. sorry for my harsh tone truebluegreen Apr 2013 #26
This issue is not whether chained CPI is a good or bad thing. The issue is ... BlueStreak Apr 2013 #5
+1 forestpath Apr 2013 #8
+2 byeya Apr 2013 #10
+1000000000000000000000000000000000 newfie11 Apr 2013 #30
If you wanted to "Raise the Cap", bvar22 Apr 2013 #38
If Obama cared about winning back the House he wouldn't have done this in the first place. forestpath Apr 2013 #7
+1000 truebluegreen Apr 2013 #20
Look on the bright side.... Moses2SandyKoufax Apr 2013 #9
Yep...and I bet he'll never again utter the word "bipartisan" either. forestpath Apr 2013 #11
Three years from now, Moses2SandyKoufax Apr 2013 #15
So true. forestpath Apr 2013 #16
+1000 truebluegreen Apr 2013 #22
They will try, bvar22 Apr 2013 #39
Or maybe it's just you. nt gulliver Apr 2013 #12
Dems are well aware that they will not win back the House in 2014 alcibiades_mystery Apr 2013 #18
BULLSHIT. That is just defeatist. It is only 14 freaking seats BlueStreak Apr 2013 #28
Pipedreams alcibiades_mystery Apr 2013 #29
Which makes those who sat home in 2010 even more guilty treestar Apr 2013 #43
Any data to back that up? Union Scribe Apr 2013 #44
experience on DU treestar Apr 2013 #46
So no, nothing to back that up. Union Scribe Apr 2013 #47
Don't care, I am simply heading off the present set of identical posts treestar Apr 2013 #49
Impossible. I've been assured here that Obama's offer to cut SS was ingenius politics. Marr Apr 2013 #21
Terrorizing the elderly and disabled is typically considered a grandmaster-level move jsr Apr 2013 #40
We are going to primary any mutha fucka who helps put SS on the table. L0oniX Apr 2013 #25
Did not work in 2010 treestar Apr 2013 #42
No, don't sit out 2014! That simply helps whatever you're 'protesting'. JHB Apr 2013 #45
I Think Obama Does Care About Winning Back The House In 2014..... global1 Apr 2013 #50
A lot of 3rd rails being peed on: SS, gun control. JVS Apr 2013 #48
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I Guess PBO And The Dems ...»Reply #39