Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: To answer a lot of people's questions [View all]dawg
(10,777 posts)28. If that is the President's reasoning ...
then he is a far, far less intelligent man than I took him to be.
Being caught "trying" will not impress any Republicans. Who does it impress? The public (even Republicans) is overwhelmingly against cuts to Social Security and Medicare.
Who is he trying to impress here? And for what possible purpose?
Does he want the Washington Post to write a nice editorial about him? Does he want a nice lunch date with David Brooks?
What is the point?
I'll tell you. There is none.
"You know, I suspect that, on Social Security, weve got a somewhat similar position." - Barack Obama, referring to opponent Mitt Romney.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
79 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Rationalizations Don't Work For Me Anymore - Stand Up For What Is Right - Grow A Spine
cantbeserious
Apr 2013
#1
Clearly A Spinning Of The Facts And Position To Paint The Picture Of Strategy Where None Really Exists
cantbeserious
Apr 2013
#4
Au Contraire - Washington Is The Center Of Fact To Fiction And Fiction To Fact Spinning
cantbeserious
Apr 2013
#69
Fact - Obama Plans To Change SS Which Will Harm Senior Citizens - Spin That
cantbeserious
Apr 2013
#71
Voice Of Reason - Is Getting Caught Trying Reasonable - Please, This Must Be Sarcasm
cantbeserious
Apr 2013
#7
Reasonable To Me Would Have Been The Progressive Caucus Budget - Where Is Obama On That Reasonable
cantbeserious
Apr 2013
#10
One Begins With A Strong Position To Force The National Debate - One Does Not Begin Negotiations
cantbeserious
Apr 2013
#24
Not Outraged Here - Just pointing Out That Obama Is Doing The Bidding Of The 1%
cantbeserious
Apr 2013
#11
Of Course The 1% Want This - This Is Proverbial Camel Nose Under The Tent Strategy - Steady Erosion
cantbeserious
Apr 2013
#17
The 1% know that can't happen now, and so are willing to let Obama have first "stab" at it. n/t
whathehell
Apr 2013
#76
The Better Starting Position Would Have Been The Progressive Caucus Budget
cantbeserious
Apr 2013
#14
Which Just Proves That He Is Doing The Bidding Of The 1% - One Does Not Compromise At The Start
cantbeserious
Apr 2013
#18
That Is An Old Story - Republicans Are Already Obstructionists - Time To Move On And Take Action
cantbeserious
Apr 2013
#31
That Ones Opening Position Is A Compromise - Is That The Best Way To Negotiate?
cantbeserious
Apr 2013
#21
I Have - "Getting Caught Trying" Is Not A Successful Negotiating Strategy - One Is Perceived As Week
cantbeserious
Apr 2013
#25
The Republicans Will Never Respond With Something Serious - That's Cannon Fodder For The Press
cantbeserious
Apr 2013
#33
Yes - Better To Be Bold And Have A National Debate That Exposes The 1% For What They Truly Are
cantbeserious
Apr 2013
#34
Exactly. It's only because he believes the same thing the GOP does on this and other issues
duffyduff
Apr 2013
#45