General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: To answer a lot of people's questions [View all]Summer Hathaway
(2,770 posts)Now THAT is the most succinct, and highly descriptive, response I've seen here of late.
Twisting the facts to fit one's outrage has become a creative pastime on this site. Some are, admittedly, better at it than others. Some are amateurs at the craft; others are professionals.
In the end, when the predictions of the Perpetually Outraged prove to have never come to fruition, they invariably retreat to one of the three possible corners they've painted themselves into:
1) Obama didn't do IT this time - but he will in future, mark my words!
2) He WAS going to do IT, but our petitions/phone calls/emails, etc., forced him to back off.
3) Okay, so he didn't do THAT, but he's now about to do THIS (insert new outrage-de-jour here).
Option No. 3 is by far the most popular, and most often used. It offers the Perpetually Outraged an "out" by changing the subject, in hopes no one will remember that the previous outrage they were so sure would happen came to naught.