General Discussion

regnaD kciN

(27,553 posts)

29. They "beat him" in 2016 as well...

Sat Feb 13, 2021, 11:41 PM

Feb 2021

...and he still became President.

Make no mistake: thanks to the electoral college, the next election will likely be on a knife’s-edge, just like the past two, the outcome of each of which came down to a few dozen thousand voters in key locations, no matter what the overall popular vote may be. And next election will not feature a Republican incumbent bearing the weight of a mishandled pandemic. If Biden suffers any setbacks, even not of his own doing (say, the economy is slow to recover from COVID), it’s quite conceivable that a crucial number of voters who went from Obama to Trump to Biden may decide the Trump years were pretty good for them personally, and that might be enough to put him back in the White House – or, if he decides the presidency isn’t worth the hassle again, elect his anointed successor.

Click here to purchase valentine hearts!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

46 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Confused: are we sure the 14th amendment is off the table? [View all] soothsayer Feb 2021 OP

Yeppers, this is essentially what we wanted done with this failed conviction msfiddlestix Feb 2021 #1

Ok but it says: soothsayer Feb 2021 #5

This can't be done this way StarfishSaver Feb 2021 #12

Rightio soothsayer Feb 2021 #16

Do We Know Why The Dems Didn't Use The 14th Amendment Route The First Time? Indykatie Feb 2021 #2

Because the 14th Amendment is not something Congress can invoke by itself StarfishSaver Feb 2021 #11

Neil Kayal explains: hlthe2b Feb 2021 #3

I get the feeling nothing is off the table. Even people in Congress who could be OAITW r.2.0 Feb 2021 #4

It needs a conviction in a court. servermsh Feb 2021 #6

Thank you StarfishSaver Feb 2021 #8

Agreed. TwilightZone Feb 2021 #14

You probably have a source already, but... TwilightZone Feb 2021 #21

This will work ONLY if a court rules that Trump is guilty of insurrection StarfishSaver Feb 2021 #7

Ah. That makes sense. soothsayer Feb 2021 #9

Forgive my ignorance on this subject, MontanaMama Feb 2021 #13

I can think of a couple of possibilities StarfishSaver Feb 2021 #15

Got it. MontanaMama Feb 2021 #18

This is what I was trying to ask. Thanks for the explanation. Vivienne235729 Feb 2021 #46

Where are you getting the notion that there must be a conviction? Nevilledog Feb 2021 #19

So a Republican-controlled Congress could have banned Obama from running for a second term NYC Liberal Feb 2021 #20

Read the article....it goes into more detail. Nevilledog Feb 2021 #22

You think Republicans need facts? lol, no TwilightZone Feb 2021 #23

Impeachment was a determination. Nevilledog Feb 2021 #32

The courts would defer to Congress' conclusion, but would still make the decision StarfishSaver Feb 2021 #39

The Constitution StarfishSaver Feb 2021 #24

From the law fare article TwilightZone referenced Nevilledog Feb 2021 #33

Also from the same LawFare article you cited StarfishSaver Feb 2021 #34

That's talking about no impeachment proceedings. They can't just decide to use it by itself. Nevilledog Feb 2021 #36

Did you read the whole article? StarfishSaver Feb 2021 #37

From what I've seen, Schumer did not say he was seriously considering it. TwilightZone Feb 2021 #10

Gotcha soothsayer Feb 2021 #26

Kind of odd, actually. TwilightZone Feb 2021 #28

Certainly won't gripe if that works out, but I really think it's up to voters Hoyt Feb 2021 #17

They "beat him" in 2016 as well... regnaD kciN Feb 2021 #29

OK, guess we are going to refuse to accept election results too. Hoyt Feb 2021 #31

Until/unless Trump is convicted of criminal charges of Insurrection, 14th is likely off the table. Fiendish Thingy Feb 2021 #25

that is my understanding as well, and I doubt he will be criminally charged Celerity Feb 2021 #30

He doesn't have to be criminally charged, but there does have to be a judicial StarfishSaver Feb 2021 #40

This message was self-deleted by its author Celerity Feb 2021 #42

Oki, poor wording upon my part. Celerity Feb 2021 #43

Of course it is Bettie Feb 2021 #27

It's not off limits. But it can't be done without judicial determination of guilt StarfishSaver Feb 2021 #35

He's worked the judicial system his entire life Bettie Feb 2021 #38

How was this applied to the original Confederates after the Civil War? NotASurfer Feb 2021 #41

At the time, everyone who served in the Confederacy was deemed by law to be an insurrectionist StarfishSaver Feb 2021 #44

I think if there was a will to use the 14th they would be all over it. All I hear Hotler Feb 2021 #45