Boehner rejects Obama cuts-revenue proposal

[TomCADem]

70. How? "Boehner: Obama holding entitlement reform 'hostage' for tax hikes"

How exactly do Republicans get credit for saving Social Security when they are insisting on such cuts without corresponding tax increases, which helps ensure that the deficit will continue to grow, thus justifying future Republican attacks on Social Security?

This is what I mean about how the media has conditioned even liberals to give Republicans a free pass.

http://firstread.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/04/05/17616402-boehner-obama-holding-entitlement-reform-hostage-for-tax-hikes?lite

Boehner's full statement follows:

"The president and I were not able to reach an agreement late last year because his offers never lived up to his rhetoric. Despite talk about so-called balance, the president's last offer was significantly skewed in favor of higher taxes and included only modest entitlement savings. He said he could go no further toward the middle, and that's why his last offer was rejected. In the end, the president got his tax hikes on the wealthy with no corresponding spending cuts. At some point we need to solve our spending problem, and what the president has offered would leave us with a budget that never balances. In reality, he's moved in the wrong direction, routinely taking off the table entitlement reforms he's previously told me he could support.

"When the president visited the Capitol last month, House Republicans stated a desire to find common ground and urged him not to make savings we agree upon conditional on another round of tax increases. If reports are accurate, the president has not heeded that call. If the president believes these modest entitlement savings are needed to help shore up these programs, there's no reason they should be held hostage for more tax hikes. That's no way to lead and move the country forward."