Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

freethought

(2,461 posts)
23. Not meaning to applaud Exxon but this is quite typical
Tue Apr 9, 2013, 12:00 AM
Apr 2013

We used to call those things 3-M pads. As the article says they look like a big paper towel but they are especially made for absorbing up oils and other organic liquids. I've worked on diesel and fuel oil spills and I hate to say in such situations there really are not any other good options.
If oil spills in a body of water the usual approach is to set out something called a "boom", it looks like that big white sausage in the bottom photograph. The boom is set out and moved to corral and concentrate the oil where it can be soaked up by the pad or sucked up by pump trucks.
Other options? Well, during the Valdeez spill they used pressurized steam to clean rocks and shoreline of the crude oil, however it raised absolute havoc with local ecology. The other option is to used detergents and or dispersing agents which can cause more problems than they solve. Corexit anyone?
The 3-M pads are widely used because they are cheap. Companies I worked for bought them by the truckload. Once they have absorbed their share of oil they can be easily gathered up, drummed and then sent off to be incinerated. If oil gets on the ground, the best option is often to come in with a backhoe or something an scrape an inch or two off the top of the afflicted area.
I would be interested in who is supervising the spill response. In some of the spill I worked on, nobody seemed to know who was in charge.
These photos don't surprise me a bit. It's what I expected for the most part.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

you really can't make this stuff up limpyhobbler Apr 2013 #1
The people in Arkansas better wish for Single Payer Health Care for the years to come. Segami Apr 2013 #5
Put a few Shamwows on there, that should do the trick! Initech Apr 2013 #2
No way! Every knows that Bounty is the quicker-picker-upper! edbermac Apr 2013 #14
I know! Why don't we just put toilet water on it! /Idiocracy solution Initech Apr 2013 #17
They're not paper towels... SidDithers Apr 2013 #3
How do you know it's not paper towels ? You called Exxon to ask what kind of pads they use ? limpyhobbler Apr 2013 #10
Because paper towels behave completely differently when you put them in water... SidDithers Apr 2013 #12
Thanks for the info Sid... PennsylvaniaMatt Apr 2013 #11
I knew as soon as I saw the video yesterday... SidDithers Apr 2013 #13
LOL! Commondreams, color me shocked. nt Comrade_McKenzie Apr 2013 #21
I agree that this is some of the shittiest, stupidest reporting I have ever seen. MADem Apr 2013 #22
What do you want to bet that they are Bounty brand? DollarBillHines Apr 2013 #4
Now we'll go out and destroy forests to make enough paper towels. Cleita Apr 2013 #6
They're called absorbent mats jmowreader Apr 2013 #7
I've seen them around marine fuel docks. Robb Apr 2013 #16
They're bigger than they look in that picture jmowreader Apr 2013 #24
Exxon, using dead trees to clean up dead dinosaurs. JaneyVee Apr 2013 #8
Millions of year dead trees, according to a posts above. TheMadMonk Apr 2013 #18
Didn't Kevin Costner invent some machine or method Auntie Bush Apr 2013 #9
You can't type "kevin costner gulf" into google? /nt TheMadMonk Apr 2013 #19
Don't the Koch Brothers Own Brawny Paper Towels? Yavin4 Apr 2013 #15
2008: MIT develops a 'paper towel' for oil spills Comrade_McKenzie Apr 2013 #20
Not meaning to applaud Exxon but this is quite typical freethought Apr 2013 #23
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»EXXON Has Solution to Ark...»Reply #23