General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Someone didn't get the lesson in 2010 [View all]graham4anything
(11,464 posts)If Hillary was 44 and Obama45(as almost certainly Hillary would have picked Obama for VP and he would as certain as Hillary will be would have been 45)
This order is better.
Because of President Obama's voters, she will get 90% of all democratic voters, and every single minority group is part of that.
The only group not supporting Obama is older white males.
Hillary will get some of that group.
Meaning a much bigger landslide.
And everything Obama gets from the repubs, would have been the same with HIllary.
So Hillary would have had 100% of the same problems as President Obama.
None of the people who put Obama down 24/7/365 ever blame the repubs.
Same as they blamed Bill Clinton and not the repubs like Newt Gingrich.
This time though, it is going to last for decades now-and Hillay is a sure shot for 8 years
the sooner she wraps it up officially, the better.
None of the others should even apply, and no person currently in office should even be considered for the VP with Hillary if they are Senate/House/Governor.
They are more important in those current positions from 2016-on.
Enough of the mi mi mi mi mi.
Everyone needs to work as strict Democratic party loyalists.
and Hillary will reap the reward of actually being the President in office when alot of the change physically occurs
(assuming the damn protesters don't again ruin it.)
It reminds me so much of Russia/USSR
Gorby made it free.
Instant gratification wanters made Putin the Powerful and took away the freedom because they wanted it now/now/now and were disappointed they didn't instantly get it