Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

el_bryanto

(11,804 posts)

1. The tricky thing is proving they knew it wasn't true or that reasonable reporting should have

Reply to TimberValley (Original post)

Tue Apr 9, 2013, 09:00 AM

Apr 2013

revealed that it wasn't true. If you set the bar to low - well, people will use the law to prevent all sorts of legitimate criticisms of public figures.

Bryant

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

15 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The requirement for convicting a media source of libel ought to be much lower. [View all] TimberValley Apr 2013 OP

The tricky thing is proving they knew it wasn't true or that reasonable reporting should have el_bryanto Apr 2013 #1

OK, but maybe they should be made to pay compensation or some sort of penalty TimberValley Apr 2013 #2

It sounds good - but it could have a chilling effect on discourse el_bryanto Apr 2013 #3

If the information is false, though, why shouldn't such reporters be punished? TimberValley Apr 2013 #4

The bar has to be high to discourage frivolous lawsuits hack89 Apr 2013 #5

Freedom of press shouldn't apply if the information is false. TimberValley Apr 2013 #6

I want the government to be scared of the press hack89 Apr 2013 #8

What I had in mind in the OP wasn't so much the government, but individuals. TimberValley Apr 2013 #9

+1 onenote Apr 2013 #7

What is required is a clear distinction between observed fact and opinion. bemildred Apr 2013 #10

well if you go too far then you have the English system dsc Apr 2013 #11

True, but some media sources could also disguise intentional falsehood as honest mistakes. n/t. TimberValley Apr 2013 #12

"Honest mistakes" should still be suable, just like any other industry. TimberValley Apr 2013 #13

Here is why we have this standard dsc Apr 2013 #14

for non-public figures that is the law. onenote Apr 2013 #15