Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

In reply to the discussion: Two truths about Obama [View all]

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
12. Wait,
Tue Apr 9, 2013, 09:24 AM
Apr 2013

"Obama is not even close to liberal."

..."not even close"?

President Obama signed health care reform into law, which included the biggest expansion of Medicaid since it was implemented. It also strengthened Medicare and gave new benefits to seniors. From the stimulus, to repealing DADT, to health care, student loan (taking banks out of the federal student loan process) and Wall Street reform, he's been reversing a lot of Reagan and Clinton's damaging policies, and he's still got nearly four years to go.

Obama’s stimulus package aids people with disabilities

By Mike Ervin,

<...>

The first is a one-time additional payment of $250 to people who receive Supplemental Security Income (SSI) and other selected Social Security benefits. Many SSI recipients live on less than $10,000 a year, and so this additional income will make a significant difference.

Second, the stimulus package also allocates $500 million to help the Social Security Administration reduce the processing time for claims and appeals decisions. During the Bush years, the number of people awaiting final determination on their Social Security disability claims more than doubled to 755,000. Many were waiting two years or more for determination, without income. Obama’s allocation should help end this disgrace.

<...>

More creatively, Obama provided $140 million to support centers for independent living. These nonresidential centers are run by people with disabilities and are focal points for services and advocacy. There are hundreds of these centers throughout the United States, providing thousands of good jobs for people with disabilities and others in their communities.

The stimulus package will also invest in the future by providing $540 million for vocational rehabilitation programs, which assist people with disabilities in obtaining higher education and jobs.

- more -

http://progressive.org/mag/mpervin030509.html

The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act included a number of provisions of particular concern to people with disabilities.

•The Act included $500 million to help the Social Security Administration reduce its backlog in processing disability applications;
•The Act supplied $12.2 billion in funding to the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA);
•The Act also provided $87 billion to states to bolster their Medicaid programs during the downturn; and,
•The Act provided over $500 million in funding for vocational rehabilitation services to help with job training, education and placement.
•The Act provided over $140 million in funding for independent living centers across the country.

http://www.whitehouse.gov/issues/disabilities


Krugman: Insurance and Freedom
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022636098

Senate Republicans Unanimously Support Repeal of Student Loan Reform Law

By Josh Israel

All 45 Senate Republicans voted Friday for a budget amendment that endorsed the repeal of both Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010. While Congressional Republicans attempting to repeal Obamacare is nothing new — this marks the 39th repeal attempt — this proposal also aimed to repeal the student loan reform and Pell Grant expansions that were enacted at the same time.

All 54 Senate Democrats present successfully voted to defeat the amendment, offered by Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX). If passed, it would have put the Senate on record in support of a repeal of
provisions that moved student loans from commercial banks to direct lending from the U.S. Education Department and:

  • Used half of the the estimated $61 billion in savings to increase the maximum annual Pell Grant scholarship to $5,550 in 2010 and to $5,975 by 2017, while indexing the grants to inflation.

  • Lowered monthly payments on federal student loans and shortened the debt forgiveness timeline. For new loans after 2014, this will mean graduates will have to pay 10 percent of disposable income, instead of 15.

  • Provided $2.55 billion to support historically black colleges and universities and minority-serving institutions; $2 billion for community colleges; and $750 million for a college access and completion program for students.
Such a repeal would have meant a return to larger payments, smaller Pell Grants, and reduced support colleges and universities while putting billions of dollars back in the coffers of Wall Street banks. But in his floor speech explaining the amendment, Cruz told his colleagues only that his proposal was about defunding and repealing Obamacare, making no mention of the billions of dollars he would take from higher education to give back to for-profit banks.

Though every Congressional Republican voted against the health care and student loan reforms, House Republicans specifically exempted the student loan reform provisions from previous repeal attempts, though they have repeatedly slammed the reform as a “Washington takeover” of the student loan industry.

- more -

http://thinkprogress.org/education/2013/03/22/1762921/senate-republicans-unanimously-support-repeal-of-student-loan-reform-law/


Want to talk about Wall Street reform, which expanded the FDIC's powers and created the CFPB?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Two truths about Obama [View all] el_bryanto Apr 2013 OP
I think that's an excellent description alcibiades_mystery Apr 2013 #1
Obama is a lame duck, his personal neurosis is not the issue at hand. It is not about personalities Bluenorthwest Apr 2013 #2
It's comforting to assume that people who's principles are different from yours have no principles. el_bryanto Apr 2013 #7
Yeah except I did not say that. One of my principles has to do with not rewording other people's Bluenorthwest Apr 2013 #9
"it is about principles, an alien concept to the 'moderate centrists'" el_bryanto Apr 2013 #11
No, that is your edited version, incomplete and thus inaccurate. Bluenorthwest Apr 2013 #17
OK - thank you for clarifying. Still seems like a pretty fine distinction el_bryanto Apr 2013 #21
Oh, a fine distinction is it? Because you say so? Bluenorthwest Apr 2013 #25
I'm really sorry I hurt you feelings so badly - I'll be more careful in the future. nt el_bryanto Apr 2013 #33
Nonsense. 99Forever Apr 2013 #3
+1 woo me with science Apr 2013 #10
Actually, ProSense Apr 2013 #13
Blah blah blah 99Forever Apr 2013 #23
That response contains almost as much insight as your original point BeyondGeography Apr 2013 #27
You think... 99Forever Apr 2013 #29
He's also very, VERY wealthy, and will never need social security closeupready Apr 2013 #4
I think's non-ideological. I think he's a pragmatist who only cares about getting things done. Liberal_Stalwart71 Apr 2013 #5
OBAMA = BAD, BAD, BAD!!!!!! Liberal_Stalwart71 Apr 2013 #6
Obama is not even close to liberal. ananda Apr 2013 #8
Wait, ProSense Apr 2013 #12
While I agree that Obama is more liberal than the poster you are responding to gives him credit for el_bryanto Apr 2013 #14
Disagree ProSense Apr 2013 #18
Heh. progressoid Apr 2013 #31
Please help. How was Carter less liberal than Obama? HereSince1628 Apr 2013 #15
Carter as President - not as he has been since leaving the Presidency el_bryanto Apr 2013 #16
Yes, please, that is the question, how was he as president less liberal than Obama? HereSince1628 Apr 2013 #19
He is a born-again Christian and was (until 2000) a member of the Southern Baptist Convention. bigtree Apr 2013 #24
"might even be center-right" hobbit709 Apr 2013 #20
you're smart enough to know that thinking this way is just bull bigtree Apr 2013 #22
Another factor is that it's extremely unlikely that a President MineralMan Apr 2013 #26
The way you phrase it here I agree, but I know you do not intend that double negative.... Bluenorthwest Apr 2013 #28
You are engaging in the nonsense of inaccurate labelling Armstead Apr 2013 #32
His instincts have never been to cater to the wealthy BeyondGeography Apr 2013 #30
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Two truths about Obama»Reply #12