Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

hlthe2b

(113,807 posts)
59. RW garbage... All authoritative sources have debunked (INCLUDING KOMEN)
Fri Feb 3, 2012, 07:01 PM
Feb 2012
http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/causes/ere/workshop-report

National Cancer Institute Findings:


Introduction

The Early Reproductive Events and Breast Cancer Workshop convened February 24-26, 2003, and the outcomes of the meeting were reviewed and discussed at the joint meeting of the NCI Board of Scientific Advisors (BSA) and Board of Scientific Counselors (BSC) held March 3, 2003.

The Workshop was established to provide an integrated scientific assessment of the association between reproductive events and the risk of breast cancer. Participants represented a diversity of breast cancer expertise, including epidemiologists, clinicians, basic scientists and breast cancer advocates. The Workshop evaluated the current strength of evidence of the characteristics of pregnancy related to cancer (epidemiologic studies), the biologic changes resulting from pregnancy that may be involved in modifying breast cancer risk (clinical studies), and the biologic mechanisms identified (animal studies).

This report summarizes the epidemiologic, clinical and animal studies findings related to early reproductive events and breast cancer risk, and each finding is given a Strength of Evidence Rating*. Gaps in research knowledge for each scientific area are identified, and recommendations for future research directions are provided.

Epidemiologic Findings

Early age at first term birth is related to lifetime decrease in breast cancer risk. (1)
Increasing parity is associated with a long-term risk reduction, even when controlling for age at first birth. (1)
The additional long-term protective effect of young age at subsequent term pregnancies is not as strong as for the first term pregnancy. (1)
A nulliparous woman has approximately the same risk as a woman with a first term birth around age 30. (1)
Breast cancer risk is transiently increased after a term pregnancy. (1)
Induced abortion is not associated with an increase in breast cancer risk. (1)
Recognized spontaneous abortion is not associated with an increase in breast cancer risk. (1)

Long duration of lactation provides a small additional reduction in breast cancer risk after consideration of age at and number of term pregnancies. (1)
Pregnancy-induced hypertension is associated with decreased breast cancer risk. (2)
Maternal DES exposure is associated with an increase in breast cancer risk. (3)

********************************
American Cancer Society:


http://www.cancer.org/Cancer/BreastCancer/MoreInformation/is-abortion-linked-to-breast-cancer
After adjusting for known breast cancer risk factors, the researchers found that induced abortion(s) had no overall effect on the risk of breast cancer. The size of this study and the manner in which it was done provide good evidence that induced abortion does not affect a woman’s risk of developing breast cancer.

**********************************
Susan G. Komen

http://ww5.komen.org/BreastCancer/Table25Abortionandbreastcancerrisk.html
Research clearly shows abortion (also called induced abortion) does not increase the risk of breast cancer. In 2003, the Board of Scientific Advisors and Board of Scientific Counselors of the National Cancer Institute (NCI) unanimously agreed the scientific evidence did not support a link between abortion and breast cancer [1]. (The NCI routinely reviews the evidence on this topic and continues to agree the evidence does not support a link between the two [2]). Also, later that year in 2003, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists also stated there was no evidence to support a link between abortion and breast cancer [3].

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Unless they clean house ... earthside Feb 2012 #1
absofuckinglutly AmandaRuth Feb 2012 #14
Personally, I think Komen should be allowed to dissolve LiberalFighter Feb 2012 #39
This is important. Let's keep this kicked crazylikafox Feb 2012 #2
I'm getting real tired of the Catholic Church atreides1 Feb 2012 #3
Rimshot, atreides PlanetBev Feb 2012 #23
Joey Ratz was the Grand Inquisitor b/f he made Pope NAO Feb 2012 #34
Isn't that odd? gratuitous Feb 2012 #26
I don't see Komen daring to cut funding to PP. sufrommich Feb 2012 #4
The outcry is re: Komen's intent to pull back funding... They have made no commitment to fund in the hlthe2b Feb 2012 #6
I realize that. Let me put it this way, sufrommich Feb 2012 #18
Logic fail justiceischeap Feb 2012 #30
The logic fail would seem to be assuming Planned Parenthood sufrommich Feb 2012 #35
Yes but the most telling statement in yesterday's interview with Brinker is the following justiceischeap Feb 2012 #37
The way they will reduce being outed is by LiberalFighter Feb 2012 #40
You're right. randome Feb 2012 #48
I think you are mistaken.. sendero Feb 2012 #65
Nope... I think they are just stupid enough to think justiceischeap Feb 2012 #66
That's exactly what I was going to say gopiscrap Feb 2012 #56
The mafia?? proud2BlibKansan Feb 2012 #5
As a proud member of the "mafia", I say... Spazito Feb 2012 #7
You took the words right out of my mouth leftynyc Feb 2012 #17
Yeah, the 99% mafia n/t VWolf Feb 2012 #45
We have a pretty lame mafia then... Lost-in-FL Feb 2012 #58
Hey, we have a PP avatar? 2ndAmForComputers Feb 2012 #68
Yep, the Admins were right on top of it when DUers asked for one! n/t Spazito Feb 2012 #74
Babykillers, the lot of them! 2ndAmForComputers Feb 2012 #75
Huh. So Brinker woke up this morning in bed with a horse's head? sarge43 Feb 2012 #51
With or without this being true, it seems that more money helps people if given to PP karynnj Feb 2012 #8
CORRECT Skittles Feb 2012 #9
Agree. nt sufrommich Feb 2012 #22
That is what I decided to do yesterday. LiberalFighter Feb 2012 #41
+1 uponit7771 Feb 2012 #64
They're referring to their financial contributors as the mafia. The Backlash Cometh Feb 2012 #10
Maybe they know something we don't. We should listen. yardwork Feb 2012 #12
I know Aerows Feb 2012 #21
it really is amazing how they went from hero to zero in like nothing flat dembotoz Feb 2012 #11
Do t hey think we're stupid? leftynyc Feb 2012 #13
Of course they think we're stupid; they project. sarge43 Feb 2012 #28
Well, duh. Warren DeMontague Feb 2012 #15
komen already promised to fulfill their orig fredamae Feb 2012 #15
I don't trust the fundy running Komen, but I trust PP sufrommich Feb 2012 #20
Fine, let them pull their funding. sarge43 Feb 2012 #33
Karen Handel and Elizabeth Thompson must resign now. Aerows Feb 2012 #19
Very well put, Aerows. kag Feb 2012 #27
Related: redqueen Feb 2012 #24
IMO the Catholic Church should really lose tax exempt status over this. Initech Feb 2012 #25
Over this... kag Feb 2012 #31
I agree Aerows Feb 2012 #32
So should the Koman Foundation IggleDoer Feb 2012 #36
True. Initech Feb 2012 #38
This was obvious to me as soon as I read the statement. drm604 Feb 2012 #29
Sounds more like saving face to me Gman Feb 2012 #42
Yeah, just ignore that apology from Komen: Ilsa Feb 2012 #43
It's not ignoring the apology Aerows Feb 2012 #44
Sorry... Not buying this PR stunt. It changes NOTHING... If you read carefully you'd see... hlthe2b Feb 2012 #52
I think PP should find public support/other instead of dealing with the Komen foundation. glinda Feb 2012 #46
I doubt PP will pass up any attempt for funding. randome Feb 2012 #49
A documentary is coming out now! "Pink Ribbons" Quantess Feb 2012 #47
k & r thanks for posting...nt Stuart G Feb 2012 #50
Why anyone would remain in the Catholic Church after the contraception fiasco is beyond me. olegramps Feb 2012 #53
Are Kormen's claims of a cancer link to abortion/contraception, correct? Brettongarcia Feb 2012 #54
No. There is no link between breast cancer and abortion. proud2BlibKansan Feb 2012 #55
RW garbage... All authoritative sources have debunked (INCLUDING KOMEN) hlthe2b Feb 2012 #59
No, it's not sustained. The statistics they use are lowered rates for women whove had babies Warren DeMontague Feb 2012 #73
"...they are continuing five grants through 2012." Lost-in-FL Feb 2012 #57
I'm so happy Planned Parenthood has thrived. caseymoz Feb 2012 #60
Not only that it should be a warning to everyone who believes that elections do matter. /nt still_one Feb 2012 #63
But now, we are watching their every move. If this is a ploy, everyone will know it, they can no jillan Feb 2012 #61
For those that were not already aware, they know now Komen's true colors. /nt still_one Feb 2012 #62
One of my adult daughters brought this up in conversation. Kalidurga Feb 2012 #67
They would damage their brand to this degee to prove a point? DCKit Feb 2012 #69
Your response to me makes no sense to me... hlthe2b Feb 2012 #70
Why republican? rtracey Feb 2012 #71
They're also desperately trying to spin away a bad situation- the MASSIVE PRO CHOICE MAJORITY Warren DeMontague Feb 2012 #72
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»RW Catholic Group Confirm...»Reply #59