Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: RW Catholic Group Confirms: Komen's announcement simply a PLOY [View all]hlthe2b
(113,807 posts)59. RW garbage... All authoritative sources have debunked (INCLUDING KOMEN)
http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/causes/ere/workshop-report
National Cancer Institute Findings:
Introduction
The Early Reproductive Events and Breast Cancer Workshop convened February 24-26, 2003, and the outcomes of the meeting were reviewed and discussed at the joint meeting of the NCI Board of Scientific Advisors (BSA) and Board of Scientific Counselors (BSC) held March 3, 2003.
The Workshop was established to provide an integrated scientific assessment of the association between reproductive events and the risk of breast cancer. Participants represented a diversity of breast cancer expertise, including epidemiologists, clinicians, basic scientists and breast cancer advocates. The Workshop evaluated the current strength of evidence of the characteristics of pregnancy related to cancer (epidemiologic studies), the biologic changes resulting from pregnancy that may be involved in modifying breast cancer risk (clinical studies), and the biologic mechanisms identified (animal studies).
This report summarizes the epidemiologic, clinical and animal studies findings related to early reproductive events and breast cancer risk, and each finding is given a Strength of Evidence Rating*. Gaps in research knowledge for each scientific area are identified, and recommendations for future research directions are provided.
Epidemiologic Findings
Early age at first term birth is related to lifetime decrease in breast cancer risk. (1)
Increasing parity is associated with a long-term risk reduction, even when controlling for age at first birth. (1)
The additional long-term protective effect of young age at subsequent term pregnancies is not as strong as for the first term pregnancy. (1)
A nulliparous woman has approximately the same risk as a woman with a first term birth around age 30. (1)
Breast cancer risk is transiently increased after a term pregnancy. (1)
Induced abortion is not associated with an increase in breast cancer risk. (1)
Recognized spontaneous abortion is not associated with an increase in breast cancer risk. (1)
Long duration of lactation provides a small additional reduction in breast cancer risk after consideration of age at and number of term pregnancies. (1)
Pregnancy-induced hypertension is associated with decreased breast cancer risk. (2)
Maternal DES exposure is associated with an increase in breast cancer risk. (3)
********************************
American Cancer Society:
http://www.cancer.org/Cancer/BreastCancer/MoreInformation/is-abortion-linked-to-breast-cancer
After adjusting for known breast cancer risk factors, the researchers found that induced abortion(s) had no overall effect on the risk of breast cancer. The size of this study and the manner in which it was done provide good evidence that induced abortion does not affect a womans risk of developing breast cancer.
**********************************
Susan G. Komen
http://ww5.komen.org/BreastCancer/Table25Abortionandbreastcancerrisk.html
Research clearly shows abortion (also called induced abortion) does not increase the risk of breast cancer. In 2003, the Board of Scientific Advisors and Board of Scientific Counselors of the National Cancer Institute (NCI) unanimously agreed the scientific evidence did not support a link between abortion and breast cancer [1]. (The NCI routinely reviews the evidence on this topic and continues to agree the evidence does not support a link between the two [2]). Also, later that year in 2003, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists also stated there was no evidence to support a link between abortion and breast cancer [3].
National Cancer Institute Findings:
Introduction
The Early Reproductive Events and Breast Cancer Workshop convened February 24-26, 2003, and the outcomes of the meeting were reviewed and discussed at the joint meeting of the NCI Board of Scientific Advisors (BSA) and Board of Scientific Counselors (BSC) held March 3, 2003.
The Workshop was established to provide an integrated scientific assessment of the association between reproductive events and the risk of breast cancer. Participants represented a diversity of breast cancer expertise, including epidemiologists, clinicians, basic scientists and breast cancer advocates. The Workshop evaluated the current strength of evidence of the characteristics of pregnancy related to cancer (epidemiologic studies), the biologic changes resulting from pregnancy that may be involved in modifying breast cancer risk (clinical studies), and the biologic mechanisms identified (animal studies).
This report summarizes the epidemiologic, clinical and animal studies findings related to early reproductive events and breast cancer risk, and each finding is given a Strength of Evidence Rating*. Gaps in research knowledge for each scientific area are identified, and recommendations for future research directions are provided.
Epidemiologic Findings
Early age at first term birth is related to lifetime decrease in breast cancer risk. (1)
Increasing parity is associated with a long-term risk reduction, even when controlling for age at first birth. (1)
The additional long-term protective effect of young age at subsequent term pregnancies is not as strong as for the first term pregnancy. (1)
A nulliparous woman has approximately the same risk as a woman with a first term birth around age 30. (1)
Breast cancer risk is transiently increased after a term pregnancy. (1)
Induced abortion is not associated with an increase in breast cancer risk. (1)
Recognized spontaneous abortion is not associated with an increase in breast cancer risk. (1)
Long duration of lactation provides a small additional reduction in breast cancer risk after consideration of age at and number of term pregnancies. (1)
Pregnancy-induced hypertension is associated with decreased breast cancer risk. (2)
Maternal DES exposure is associated with an increase in breast cancer risk. (3)
********************************
American Cancer Society:
http://www.cancer.org/Cancer/BreastCancer/MoreInformation/is-abortion-linked-to-breast-cancer
After adjusting for known breast cancer risk factors, the researchers found that induced abortion(s) had no overall effect on the risk of breast cancer. The size of this study and the manner in which it was done provide good evidence that induced abortion does not affect a womans risk of developing breast cancer.
**********************************
Susan G. Komen
http://ww5.komen.org/BreastCancer/Table25Abortionandbreastcancerrisk.html
Research clearly shows abortion (also called induced abortion) does not increase the risk of breast cancer. In 2003, the Board of Scientific Advisors and Board of Scientific Counselors of the National Cancer Institute (NCI) unanimously agreed the scientific evidence did not support a link between abortion and breast cancer [1]. (The NCI routinely reviews the evidence on this topic and continues to agree the evidence does not support a link between the two [2]). Also, later that year in 2003, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists also stated there was no evidence to support a link between abortion and breast cancer [3].
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
75 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The outcry is re: Komen's intent to pull back funding... They have made no commitment to fund in the
hlthe2b
Feb 2012
#6
Yes but the most telling statement in yesterday's interview with Brinker is the following
justiceischeap
Feb 2012
#37
With or without this being true, it seems that more money helps people if given to PP
karynnj
Feb 2012
#8
Sorry... Not buying this PR stunt. It changes NOTHING... If you read carefully you'd see...
hlthe2b
Feb 2012
#52
I think PP should find public support/other instead of dealing with the Komen foundation.
glinda
Feb 2012
#46
Why anyone would remain in the Catholic Church after the contraception fiasco is beyond me.
olegramps
Feb 2012
#53
No, it's not sustained. The statistics they use are lowered rates for women whove had babies
Warren DeMontague
Feb 2012
#73
Not only that it should be a warning to everyone who believes that elections do matter. /nt
still_one
Feb 2012
#63
But now, we are watching their every move. If this is a ploy, everyone will know it, they can no
jillan
Feb 2012
#61
For those that were not already aware, they know now Komen's true colors. /nt
still_one
Feb 2012
#62
They're also desperately trying to spin away a bad situation- the MASSIVE PRO CHOICE MAJORITY
Warren DeMontague
Feb 2012
#72