Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

snappyturtle

(14,656 posts)
Tue Apr 9, 2013, 04:14 PM Apr 2013

THIS scares me: from Jonathon Turley's website [View all]

http://jonathanturley.org/2013/03/31/could-the-banksters-grab-your-bank-deposits/


Could the Banksters Grab Your Bank Deposits?
Published 1, March 31, 2013 Congress , Constitutional Law , Courts , International , Justice , Uncategorized139 Comments


Respectfully submitted by Lawrence E. Rafferty- Guest Blogger

The recent news about Cyprus banks confiscating depositor’s funds sent chills throughout the financial world here and abroad. I couldn’t believe that the plan in Cyprus hinged on the idea that the bank could just steal customer’s funds to balance the bank’s books. I muttered to myself when I read the story that something as crazy as that couldn’t possible happen here in the United States. Unfortunately, I learned that the plan to pull a Cyprus type grab here was already in the works.

“A joint paper by the US Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and the Bank of England dated December 10, 2012, shows that these plans have been long in the making; that they originated with the G20 Financial Stability Board in Basel, Switzerland (discussed earlier here); and that the result will be to deliver clear title to the banks of depositor funds. ” NationofChange

snip.....

To be clear, this joint FDIC-BOE plan would need enabling legislation to be passed before it could become the law of the land. However, the bankruptcy laws have put unsecured creditors, which depositors would be labeled under the plan, lower in seniority to the claims of derivative counterparties which would mean that the very parties who are causing the bank to fail, could collect before the innocent depositors.

snip....

This type of bank bail out is an end run on depositors and on the American public. I can only guess why the corporate owned mass media has not been carrying this story. I do not think that I would every put any money in any of the big multi-state banks in light of this potential nightmare of a bailout. I would love to see the Senate hold a hearing to question FDIC officials on this joint plan. While the wealthy use the banks, a good portion of their wealth is in other investment vehicles and therefore the brunt of the bailout could be borne by you and me. Of course the banks will claim that we would receive stock in lieu of the confiscated funds, but can you pay your mortgage bill with stock from a failing bank?

-----------------------

I trust Jonathon Turley therefore I trust his guest blogger. What do you think? With everything that has gone on in the last decade I worry that this scenario of banks seizing deposits could happen.

Edited for clarity of my own words not the author's.

2nd edit: For better understanding read:
http://www.nationofchange.org/it-can-happen-here-confiscation-scheme-planned-us-and-uk-depositors-1364735979

This link is on the Turley website in the above article....it answers much.

59 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Can you eat stocks? demwing Apr 2013 #1
Doesn't matter how big of a fire I build ... Kennah Apr 2013 #54
Bank Of America Dumps $75 Trillion In Derivatives On U.S. Taxpayers With Federal Approval OnyxCollie Apr 2013 #2
I so appreciate you posting these links. I had read about this and it, too, is snappyturtle Apr 2013 #3
It seems likely to happen. OnyxCollie Apr 2013 #5
Meanwhile, Wikipedia says that "In nominal terms, the total 2011 GWP was around US$69.11 trillion." Occulus Apr 2013 #6
Like an aneurysm about to burst. nt OnyxCollie Apr 2013 #7
I'm starting to think that letting it all fall apart is the only possible path to a lasting remedy. Occulus Apr 2013 #9
Misleading figure for a couple of reasons: geek tragedy Apr 2013 #11
Glad someone has a clue. Lucky Luciano Apr 2013 #35
Financial transactions are not part of GDP MindPilot Apr 2013 #16
The notional amount of their derivs was about $75T. Lucky Luciano Apr 2013 #34
your math isn't wrong. Volaris Apr 2013 #40
uh Occulus Apr 2013 #41
sorry. But on a brighter note, think of it this way: Volaris Apr 2013 #43
Hmmm. Then how about this tactic. Occulus Apr 2013 #45
See, THAT'S why I come here, Volaris Apr 2013 #46
You're welcome. Occulus Apr 2013 #47
You always think this couldn't possibly happen mercymechap Apr 2013 #4
It's not so much that any one of us would be a mother lode for a bank but snappyturtle Apr 2013 #13
If/when it happens I'm sure PBO will propose a policy to "protect" the VERY VERY VERY poor..... forestpath Apr 2013 #8
A work program OnyxCollie Apr 2013 #10
A FEMA camp program, more likely. WinkyDink Apr 2013 #50
ACLU: Debtors’ prisons are alive and well in (Ohio) OnyxCollie Apr 2013 #53
I'm reading the actual FDIC BOE plan and am a substantial portion of the way through it, Benton D Struckcheon Apr 2013 #12
...and just finished it. Benton D Struckcheon Apr 2013 #14
Well, in the bank's view, the depositors are safe as they get stock in lieu of $$. snappyturtle Apr 2013 #15
No, that's not what it says. Benton D Struckcheon Apr 2013 #17
Actually the FDIC-BOE article says from the beginning snappyturtle Apr 2013 #27
I'm not addressing the article, I'm addressing the primary source, the actual plan. Benton D Struckcheon Apr 2013 #30
I was using the same source as you. Unfortunately, I used the term 'article'. nt snappyturtle Apr 2013 #37
Where does it "say from the beginning that depositers are unsecured creditors"? muriel_volestrangler Apr 2013 #57
It doesn't. What I meant to say was that from the beginning to the end of snappyturtle Apr 2013 #58
Here's the paragraph that Benton refers to just above muriel_volestrangler Apr 2013 #24
It's a post Cyprus interpretation of the document that doesn't stand up to even cursory scrutiny, Benton D Struckcheon Apr 2013 #32
Well, it's not 'obvious' to me. Maybe you should also read snappyturtle Apr 2013 #36
According to the CRA amendments to the Gramm-Leach Act, OnyxCollie Apr 2013 #18
Read that again Benton D Struckcheon Apr 2013 #19
90 billion > 75 trillion OnyxCollie Apr 2013 #22
That's notional value Benton D Struckcheon Apr 2013 #23
Richard Wolff is concerned OnyxCollie Apr 2013 #28
Thanks for posting these links too...love me some Richard Wolff. I find snappyturtle Apr 2013 #29
That's just an appeal to authority Benton D Struckcheon Apr 2013 #31
Richard Wolff is an economics professor. OnyxCollie Apr 2013 #33
You still have not acknowledged the difference between derivative notional and derivative value. Lucky Luciano Apr 2013 #38
Well, what's the difference then? OnyxCollie Apr 2013 #39
I would estimate that dividing by 25 is about right. Lucky Luciano Apr 2013 #42
Even dividing by 25 is still a shitload of money. nt OnyxCollie Apr 2013 #44
Remember that is gross. If I have two trades on the book with you... Lucky Luciano Apr 2013 #52
Is the plan you are reading titled dixiegrrrrl Apr 2013 #25
My bank is so nice... fadedrose Apr 2013 #20
Literal one would be just plain silly as Satan's minions aren't likely to catch fire. Kennah Apr 2013 #55
It certainly would screw the majority of Social Security recipients, who Cleita Apr 2013 #21
Gee, one might almost think that was part of the plan. WinkyDink Apr 2013 #51
Theoretically, the FDIC insures deposits. JDPriestly Apr 2013 #26
I've done more reading on this doc by the FDIC and BOE. snappyturtle Apr 2013 #59
K&R DeSwiss Apr 2013 #48
THAT would finally = revolution. Bankers would be murdered. WinkyDink Apr 2013 #49
Madame Guillotine, please pick up your voicemail. Kennah Apr 2013 #56
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»THIS scares me: from Jona...