Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: If Thatcher was so "evil," how'd she get in? [View all]unblock
(56,198 posts)46. i agree indexing brackets made sense, but that was hardly a major issue
it's a fairly wonky topic and i doubt all that many votes changed due to that issue.
the hostage and stagflation coverage were far larger issues, as was reagan's tax cuts themselves.
indexing the brackets is something that impacts people more over time, and people don't tend to vote based on longer-term issues when there are bigger, more immediate issues at hand.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
67 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Prime Ministers aren't elected. They are chosen by party members with the most seats.
JaneyVee
Apr 2013
#1
stop moving the goal posts (but yes, I support nuclear disarmament of England)
CreekDog
Apr 2013
#24
What am I "running away from"? I'll say it again, unilateral nuclear disarmament was a stupid policy
Nye Bevan
Apr 2013
#30
OK. I will say for the record that I fully stand by, am not ashamed of, and am not running away from
Nye Bevan
Apr 2013
#37
What is the value of "left wing policies" that will never be implemented...
brooklynite
Apr 2013
#54
And, the poor Brits ended up with (ugh!) Tony Blair and 3rd Way/Tory policies.
Tierra_y_Libertad
Apr 2013
#19
Reagan's opponents weren't just weak, there was a LOT of anti-incumbent sentiment
Blue_Tires
Apr 2013
#3
Carter alienated the working base of the Party and refused to help the Party with fund raising and
byeya
Apr 2013
#52
No, there was a specific grievance in Reagan's case that went unaddressed by Democrats,
Benton D Struckcheon
Apr 2013
#9
that was indeed a large factor. imagine if the hostage crisis had been resolved under carter.
unblock
Apr 2013
#47
And Obama didn't get it and re-elected "because" his opponents are far-right nutcases. Rather...
GodlessBiker
Apr 2013
#8
'third way can win while socialism can not'. lol. 'third way' = neoliberalism & the public hates
HiPointDem
Apr 2013
#14
Sure - that's why we have all those Congresspeople advocating nationalization eh?
dmallind
Apr 2013
#25
umm -- what party ever advocated for the people controlling the means of production? In
HiPointDem
Apr 2013
#27
1) Prime Ministers aren't elected and 2) Harmful leaders take power all the time
CreekDog
Apr 2013
#23
She was "evil" because saying so ad nauseum is good for one's DU cred.
cherokeeprogressive
Apr 2013
#38
allowing tenants to buy their "council houses". You CLEARLY have no IDEA of the effect:
WinkyDink
Apr 2013
#59
You don't directly elect prime ministers. That said, even she barely saw it coming at the time. (nt)
Posteritatis
Apr 2013
#41
Pretty neat trick, considering it was formed two years after Thatcher was elected...
brooklynite
Apr 2013
#56