Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)

5. Not sure what Obama has to do with this.

Reply to graham4anything (Reply #1)

Wed Apr 10, 2013, 09:26 AM

Apr 2013

Hell yes I will back the "journalist" in this circumstance. This information was already known to the investigators when the "journalist" found out. It in no way has any effect on the defense. "Journalists" should be vigorously defended in matters such as this. The judge, in the end, will not grant the request of the defense. Why you would is beyond me.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

30 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

FOX News reporter faces jail for not revealing sources [View all] proud2BlibKansan Apr 2013 OP

Watch what happens... graham4anything Apr 2013 #1

Not sure what Obama has to do with this. NCTraveler Apr 2013 #5

Careful with all that stretching Cal Carpenter Apr 2013 #13

You realize you are creating a red herring, right? Raine1967 Apr 2013 #15

He's trying to, but I don't think anyone is buying it. nt ZombieHorde Apr 2013 #26

What does this have to do with Pres Obama? leftynyc Apr 2013 #18

What reputation as a journalist? You work for FOX news. JaneyVee Apr 2013 #2

This message was self-deleted by its author earthside Apr 2013 #7

'Souces ? We don't need no stinkin' sources...we're Fox News.' KurtNYC Apr 2013 #10

But since Fox has admitted it is NOT a news biz...... dixiegrrrrl Apr 2013 #3

Meh. When she got the notebook info, she knew it was given to her in violation of the judge's order. Robb Apr 2013 #4

This is not about the judges order. NCTraveler Apr 2013 #6

she should be jailed for impersonating a journalist. lastlib Apr 2013 #8

She could use the "Some people are saying" defense. nt BlueStreak Apr 2013 #9

LOL! proud2BlibKansan Apr 2013 #12

wait FOX news has sources? Johonny Apr 2013 #11

Fox news local reporters are different than FAUX news cable "reporters" haele Apr 2013 #14

This case does not involve a "local reporter" onenote Apr 2013 #17

So instead of discussing how important freedom of the press is Cal Carpenter Apr 2013 #16

So you are siding with Fox? graham4anything Apr 2013 #21

Aw c'mon Graham Cal Carpenter Apr 2013 #23

There is a point here I am making- graham4anything Apr 2013 #24

Not very well. Cal Carpenter Apr 2013 #25

It's not up to a journalist to enforce the law. Journalists receive stolen information all the time Luminous Animal Apr 2013 #22

Journalists should not have to reveal their sources... joeybee12 Apr 2013 #19

This is bullshit-- jailing journalists for not revealing their sources is wrong. Marr Apr 2013 #20

That lucky so and so! Lady Freedom Returns Apr 2013 #27

Libel not liable. Liable is what you are if you lose you libel suit. :) TeamPooka Apr 2013 #29

I thought it was, but the spell check said no that "l-i-b-e-l" was wrong. Lady Freedom Returns Apr 2013 #30

Hate the Sales Department not the Journalist. Lady Freedom Returns Apr 2013 #28