Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LeftInTX

(34,852 posts)
2. It's so darn simple, but it's so darn hard.
Thu Apr 11, 2013, 02:50 AM
Apr 2013

It's so straight forward, yet the Republicans don't want to fund it. Sure Obama caved, but he wouldn't have if the House was controlled by Dems.

I think the third way stuff has been about compromising with Republicans, mainly so that we attract independent voters. However, in this case it won't appeal to independents.

But you state the problem very clearly. In the 1970s, this was never an issue.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Social Security is mostly...»Reply #2