Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

luckyleftyme2

(3,880 posts)
26. like most who post in here
Thu Apr 11, 2013, 09:34 AM
Apr 2013

you haven't a clue eclining Deer Hunters
The deer herd in the State of Wisconsin is largely kept in check by private hunters who purchase licenses and kill deer each
fall. Not only is hunƟ ng vital to wildlife management eff orts, but it is also an important cultural acƟ vity through which people
become intricately connected to the natural world. However, the number of deer hunters in the state has declined in recent
years, causing concern about the future of the herd, the sport, and conservaƟ on eff orts. The number of gun deer hunƟ ng
licenses sold to Wisconsin residents declined from 644, 991 in 2000 to 602,791 in 2010. This is a decline of 6.5% in ten years,
despite the fact that 10 and 11 year old hunters were added for the fi rst Ɵ me in 2009 and 2010. Declines have been most
stark among males age 25-44, who have (in the recent past) hunted at high rates and killed a large number of deer.
This report is the result of a study undertaken by the
Applied PopulaƟ on Laboratory at the University of
Wisconsin-Madison at the request of the Wisconsin
Department of Natural Resources Wildlife Division.
It is a collaboraƟ ve project between these two
organizaƟ ons with the goal of beƩ er understanding
how the populaƟ on of the state’s hunters is changing
over Ɵ me and to project future deer hunters. The
study takes a demographic approach invesƟ gaƟ ng
parƟ cipaƟ on in deer hunƟ ng by age over Ɵ me.
Despite the fact that the number of female hunters
is increasing and the acƟ vity is becoming more
popular among younger females, the number of
female hunters remains too small to make up for
the decline in male hunters. In 2010, 91% of gun
deer licenses sold were to males. For this reason,
this report focuses on understanding declines in
the male gun deer hunter populaƟ on.
We specifi cally examine the eff ects of Ɵ me period, age, and generaƟ onal diff erences on hunter parƟ cipaƟ on rates. Regarding
Ɵ me period, we fi nd that parƟ cipaƟ on rates dropped markedly between 2001 and 2002 with the discovery of CWD. More
importantly, rates conƟ nued to drop between 2004 and 2009 across all ages and generaƟ ons, except those over age 65 who
are hunƟ ng at higher rates than they have in the past. SƟ ll, age plays an important role in people’s likelihood to hunt, with
parƟ cipaƟ on rates dropping off signifi cantly aŌ er about age 65. At the same Ɵ me, generaƟ onal diff erences help to determine
hunter parƟ cipaƟ on rates. Males born during the Baby Boom (1946-1965) have been more likely to hunt than younger
cohorts, regardless of age. Overall, recent declines in hunter numbers have occurred through two processes. First, relaƟ vely
few young men born since 1980 (the Millenial GeneraƟ on) have been recruited into hunƟ ng. Second, retenƟ on rates year to
year among hunters age 30-55 have been relaƟ vely low over the last decade.
ProjecƟ ons of future hunters suggest that the male gun hunter populaƟ on will decline more dramaƟ cally over the next ten to
twenty years. We provide three future scenarios for male gun deer hunters using two diff erent methodological approaches
and making diff erent assumpƟ ons about future parƟ cipaƟ on rates and how they will vary by age and cohort. Overall, the
models suggest that in 2020, the number of male gun hunters will drop to about 480,000 (compared to 549,505 in 2010). If
current paƩ erns conƟ nue, the number could drop to 400,000 or fewer by 2030.
Finally, a geographic analysis of the counƟ es in which hunters reside indicates that most hunters live in urban areas, but
hunter parƟ cipaƟ on rates are highest in more rural areas of the state and parƟ cularly high in northern Wisconsin. Deer
hunter retenƟ on rates among middle aged males have shown more decline in the eastern part of the state than in the west,
with the most stark decline occurring in northeastern and southeastern Wisconsin. The proporƟ on of 20-24 year olds who
hunt (recruitment) declined in almost every county between 2000 (GeneraƟ on X) and 2009 (Millenials). This decline
was greater in eastern Wisconsin than in the western part of the state. 1
Summary
0
100,000
200,000
300,000
400,000
500,000
600,000
700,000
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Wisconsin Resident Gun Deer Hunters, 2000-2010
Females Other Males Males Age 25-44
Applied Population Laboratory Richelle Winkler & Rozalynn Klaas February 2011
Wisconsin’s gun deer hunter numbers are continuing to decline!

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Huh? 22nd Amendment addresses term limits AndyA Apr 2013 #1
thank you luckyleftyme2 Apr 2013 #9
Appears to be a doubling down on the 2nd Amendment HereSince1628 Apr 2013 #10
I saw that! LOL Eleanors38 Apr 2013 #45
Term limits? I'm confused (nt). nessa Apr 2013 #2
Good heavens. It appears the constitution/bill of rights is no longer being taught..22nd amendment?! hlthe2b Apr 2013 #3
This message was self-deleted by its author Dash87 Apr 2013 #4
The 22nd Admendent: Our Right to Bear Tin Foil! FSogol Apr 2013 #5
well luckyleftyme2 Apr 2013 #18
Huh? I gave you a list of reasons why hunting/fishing numbers might be down. FSogol Apr 2013 #28
That made me laugh pintobean Apr 2013 #19
No, but I think the 21st Fla_Democrat Apr 2013 #6
No. When did they ever express interest in doing that? Dash87 Apr 2013 #7
Geez, guys... Blue_Adept Apr 2013 #8
A typo repeated 3 times isn't a simple typo HereSince1628 Apr 2013 #11
hmm luckyleftyme2 Apr 2013 #22
I did read it. I also read the comment of Blue Adept, and replied to that reply HereSince1628 Apr 2013 #40
exactly luckyleftyme2 Apr 2013 #13
Maybe you should translate it for us. nt pintobean Apr 2013 #14
I sure hope so. Reinterpret the 2nd and it's legally gone. graham4anything Apr 2013 #12
lol. don't hold your breath, dear. cali Apr 2013 #17
In the insurance thread you said no tolerance after 21 days. cherokeeprogressive Apr 2013 #46
why no. no it couldn't. And kids hunting and fishing are a dime a dozen where I live. cali Apr 2013 #15
like many luckyleftyme2 Apr 2013 #31
See #45. Eleanors38 Apr 2013 #48
no. Buzz Clik Apr 2013 #16
No. HappyMe Apr 2013 #20
Maybe it's the whole... Fla_Democrat Apr 2013 #23
like most who post in here luckyleftyme2 Apr 2013 #26
Okay! Whatever you say! HappyMe Apr 2013 #32
neither is luckyleftyme2 Apr 2013 #36
Here you go pintobean Apr 2013 #29
Good grief! HappyMe Apr 2013 #34
and where is that luckyleftyme2 Apr 2013 #33
I'm starting to wonder what planet you are on. HappyMe Apr 2013 #35
A repeal of the Second Amendment followed by a nationwide gun confiscation are sorely needed. LonePirate Apr 2013 #21
And you think the American public would ever support such a thing? hack89 Apr 2013 #25
Nationwide confiscation? HappyMe Apr 2013 #27
"No one is coming to take your guns away." Must be rumor. Eleanors38 Apr 2013 #49
Amending the Constitution is VERY difficult. GreenStormCloud Apr 2013 #24
Very difficult? I'd say, next to impossible. n/t FSogol Apr 2013 #30
All 50 states wouldn't ratify if Ter Apr 2013 #37
I do not think one should worry about the 2nd Amendment being repealed in the US. Thinkingabout Apr 2013 #38
now your the kind we need luckyleftyme2 Apr 2013 #39
The U.S. does not have a Dept. of Needs. GreenStormCloud Apr 2013 #41
What does hunting have to do with it? Eleanors38 Apr 2013 #50
No. And Wow. And No again. onenote Apr 2013 #42
It would require a new amendment that would have to pass Congress, first... Spider Jerusalem Apr 2013 #43
"Hunting?" Since 80+% of gun-owners don't hunt, what is the relevancy? Eleanors38 Apr 2013 #44
Nnnnnnope cherokeeprogressive Apr 2013 #47
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»can the hardnose right ca...»Reply #26