Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Obama budget proposal slashes LIHEAP funds [View all]ProSense
(116,464 posts)50. The President
"I don't understand the simple point you are making because you are deflecting."
...proposed budget is always tweaked by Congress. Members of Congress spend months debating the budget. The President previously proposed cuts to LIHEAP.
EXCLUSIVE: White House to Cut Energy Assistance for the Poor
http://www.nationaljournal.com/whitehouse/exclusive-obama-to-cut-energy-assistance-for-the-poor-20110209
Here was the justification.
Bring Cost of LIHEAP Down to Previous Levels. During this period of tough budget choices, the Presidents Budget provides $2.57 billion for the Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP) to help struggling families make ends meet by offsetting some of their home heating and cooling costs. The Budget does not re-propose the creation of a LIHEAP funding trigger included in previous budget requests. The LIHEAP program doubled in FY 2009 following an energy spike, but energy prices are now significantly lower, and the prior level is no longer sustainable. The 50 percent funding reduction brings funding back to the level before the energy price spike. The Administration will continue to monitor energy prices going forward and will be willing to revisit program needs if there are significant price increases
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=433x611473
Clearly, there hasn't been a 50 percent reduction since the stimulus increase in 2009.

http://liheap.ncat.org/Funding/lhemhist.htm
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
95 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Bright side: Seniors won't have to choose between heating and food anymore
kenny blankenship
Apr 2013
#4
Next will be a gov. offered voucher on affordable caskets for the poor, the old and the sick. n/t
RKP5637
Apr 2013
#26
... or possibly "Soylent Green!" Donate now, feed the worlds' hungry and impoverished! n/t
RKP5637
Apr 2013
#68
Yep, that's about it....Nice message from our supposed "Democratic" president, huh?
whathehell
Apr 2013
#19
I'm really fed up with jumping up and down for Obama right or wrong. Yep, he's done
RKP5637
Apr 2013
#21
I have to say, I never expected to see this from a Democratically elected President
liberal N proud
Apr 2013
#6
The country is collapsing for "we the people." Many Americans still don't get what is
RKP5637
Apr 2013
#27
You passed the buck to Congress. But this is the buck he is starting with as his proposed budget.
Armstead
Apr 2013
#23
Let me $pell it out for $o that it make$ $en$e to you...this is OBAMA'S proposal...
truebrit71
Apr 2013
#33
I don't understand the simple point you are making because you are deflecting.
Armstead
Apr 2013
#40
So he's suggesting cuts in LIHEAP again.....which is what the OP says...and you continue to defend..
truebrit71
Apr 2013
#54
Okay. So you agree that it is not a good thing to do, although you see the reasoning for it.
Armstead
Apr 2013
#80
They didn't attempt to call you deliberately obtuse..they DID call you deliberately obtuse...
truebrit71
Apr 2013
#69
I recall the last time this was brought up there was much outrage...and the u$ual defen$e...
truebrit71
Apr 2013
#48