Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: WHOOMP, there it is. [View all]BrainDrain
(244 posts)122. You say you want a revolution welllllllll...ya know
You better free your mind instead.
Lets begin with Hillary. You will begin to hear how it has to be her 'cause no one else can beat (fill in the blank) for the Presidency. So we will all fall in line like good little drones and vote for HRC in the primaries and then in the general and hope like hell she is better than (fill in the blank). And the cycle repeats itself ad nauseam.
We all want/expect/hope that our newly elected gods will somehow respond to our wishes and we act/get so disappointed when they don't. We then spend countless hours pouring forth on why they should do this, that or the other thing we so hoped they would do without us having to yell at them to do it.
But alas and alack, our hero/heroine only disappoints and there is a strident call for new blood in the Democratic party, someone progressive and responsive. Someone we could fall enough in love with that we could give them our money and our sweat and our vote. But you need to remember, we are just schmucks to be swindled out of our cash and our vote by a party apparatus that only cares about maintaining itself and it's most favored souls.
How much of the party apparatus do you think would be willing to back say an Alan Greyson? Or maybe an Elizabeth Warren? How many of our wise old men/women of the Democratic party would be willing to step up for either one? Need i remind anyone about what happened to Ashley Judd?
Think on this, nothing increases resentment like going along because it's expected of you, or you are being told by the "adults who know better" that you should.
STOP listening to the Sunday morning pundits they don't know their ass from a hole in the ground.
STOP listening to the wise old Democratic operatives 'cause their wisdom has gone beyond the expiration date and at their core, they are working to maintain the status quo.
You want real progressive candidates? STOP giving money to any that aren't.
You want real progressive candidates? STOP giving your time and effort to those that aren't.
You want real progressive candidates? STOP voting for any that aren't.
Once we stop doing all that, THEN I think we will get somewhere.
Let the Revolution.......begin.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
151 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Keep on doing what you've been doing, you're going to keep on getting what you're getting,
MadHound
Apr 2013
#3
The people who are about to endorse or reject his proposed SS cut are running again.
Marr
Apr 2013
#11
Now the Democratic Congress-Critters have to decide if they are going to run
rhett o rick
Apr 2013
#21
blah, blah, blah. I won't hold WI Democratic candidates responsible for this.
PeaceNikki
Apr 2013
#26
Did we change the subject when I wasnt looking? Doesnt matter. You have nothing but rudeness (blah,
rhett o rick
Apr 2013
#32
Your inability to read my other posts in this thread is what's short-sighted. Spare me your total BS
PeaceNikki
Apr 2013
#117
No, the OP wants the Democratic party to fucking sit up and pay attention to us,
MadHound
Apr 2013
#22
Your response smacks of desperation. You cant defend why the Pres proposed cutting SS so you are
rhett o rick
Apr 2013
#28
So your response is "whatever"? Add that to your "bullshit" responses. You dont seem to have
rhett o rick
Apr 2013
#36
You say that those that do not believe as you are fools. I guess there is no reason to discuss
rhett o rick
Apr 2013
#136
a deeper problem is, losing elections has no real adverse consequences for dem party
KG
Apr 2013
#10
Oh, I think that if there was a massive loss of support, it would make a huge difference.
MadHound
Apr 2013
#15
It would take eight years, probably much less, given history and political realities
MadHound
Apr 2013
#78
I am proposing that we hold our party, our politicians responsible for their actions.
MadHound
Apr 2013
#44
Actually, what was posted is readily available for anyone to see. Your statement that
AnotherMcIntosh
Apr 2013
#53
And yet Obama has signed a midnight deal with Kharzi to keep troops in Afghanistan through 2024,
MadHound
Apr 2013
#51
Sorry, I stopped reading at "party uber alles". Have never found hyperbole like this a benefit
pinto
Apr 2013
#58
Yep, dividing the Democratic Party by forming a third party is a GREAT idea!....
OldDem2012
Apr 2013
#61
Not one. Not a single suggestion of how to realistically achieve this in a given time period.
cali
Apr 2013
#88
You mean as opposed to the people who would sacrifice the poor, disabled and elderly...
MindPilot
Apr 2013
#92
No. I don't. Now do tell who you sacrifice, how long it will take and what the plan is
cali
Apr 2013
#93
yes, I can see you have no grasp of the complexities. that, honeypie, is abundantly clear.
cali
Apr 2013
#112
Nice deflection. No, Ms. Thug has been here since nearly the beginning, about the same time as you.
Egalitarian Thug
Apr 2013
#115
So, hand the keys over to the cons, shills, vultures, christianists and batshit loons?
VOX
Apr 2013
#98
Your right, we all should be giving the rich and wealthy a lot more to worry about
nolabels
Apr 2013
#135
I might love to see 20 years of nothing but Republican rule and policies....
SamReynolds
Apr 2013
#133
IF this ever comes to a vote (which I doubt), why don't we see how each Dem votes?
gateley
Apr 2013
#143