Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

PeaceNikki

(27,985 posts)
22. I am not sure, we should ask them. But I do not believe for a second that many of those would
Thu Apr 11, 2013, 07:06 PM
Apr 2013

support cuts. Read the letter that they DID sign their names to:

http://cpc.grijalva.house.gov/press-releases/progressive-caucus-cochairs-statement-to-president-obama-social-security-benefit-cuts-hurt-our-economy1/


4/5/13


Washington, D.C. – Congressional Progressive Caucus Co-Chairs Reps. Raúl M. Grijalva (D-AZ) and Keith Ellison (D-MN) released the following statement today responding to reports that President Obama will include chained CPI in his annual budget.

“Republicans have been trying to dismantle Social Security ever since President Roosevelt proposed it during the Great Depression. We should not try to bargain for their good will with policies that hurt our seniors, especially since they’ve been unwilling to reduce tax loopholes for millionaires and wealthy corporations by so much as a dime.

“One hundred seven Members of the House of Representatives, a majority of the Democratic Caucus, have already stated our vigorous opposition to cutting Social Security, Medicare, or Medicaid benefits. Americans all over the country depend on every single dollar they get from Social Security to put food on the table and pay for housing. Using chained CPI will shift more costs onto already struggling American families, seniors, veterans – including our 3.2 million disabled veterans who also depend on the Social Security calculation for their Veterans Affairs benefits – individuals with disabilities, and children on survivors’ benefits.

“This week, a new study from the New America Foundation finds that proposals to cut Social Security benefits could be disastrous for our economy because the recession has led more seniors to rely to Social Security for income. Cutting benefits now, when people are already struggling to make ends meet, will mean unnecessary hardship for millions of people. It is unpopular, unwise and unworkable.”

The text of the Feb. 15 Schakowsky-Conyers- Grijalva-Ellison-Edwards letter opposing chained CPI is below.



^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^



February 15, 2013



Dear President Obama:



We want to thank you for standing strong in the American Taxpayer Relief Act to protect Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid from benefit cuts that would jeopardize the well-being of millions of Americans.



We write to affirm our vigorous opposition to cutting Social Security, Medicare, or Medicaid benefits in any final bill to replace sequestration. Earned Social Security and Medicare benefits provide the financial and health protections necessary to keep individuals and families out of poverty. Medicaid is not only a lifeline for low-income children, pregnant women, people with disabilities and families, it is the primary source of long-term care services and supports for 3.6 million individuals. We cannot overstate their importance for our constituents and our country.



That is why we remain deeply opposed to proposals to reduce Social Security benefits through use of the chained CPI to calculate cost-of-living adjustments. We remain committed to making the changes that will extend solvency for 75 years, but Social Security has not contributed to our current fiscal problems and it should not be on the bargaining table.



Similarly, we oppose proposals to increase Medicare cost-sharing requirements or to raise the age of eligibility. Half of all Medicare recipients live on less than $22,000 a year – yet they spend, on average, three times as much of those limited incomes on health care as other Americans. Raising their already heavy cost-sharing burden or increasing the age of eligibility doesn’t lower health care costs, it just shifts them to those who can least afford more financial burdens – seniors, people with disabilities and their families.



A commitment to keeping the middle-class strong and reducing poverty requires a commitment to keeping Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid strong. We urge you to reject any proposals to cut benefits, and we look forward to working with you to enact approaches that instead rely on economic growth and more fair revenue-raising policies to solve our fiscal problems.



Sincerely,



Schakowsky, Jan

Ellison, Keith

Grijalva, Raúl M.

Conyers, John

Edwards, Donna

Barber, Ron

Bass, Karen

Bera, Ami

Bonamici, Suzanne

Brady, Robert

Braley, Bruce L.

Brown, Corrine

Brownley, Julia

Bustos, Cheri

Butterfield, G.K.

Capps, Lois

Cardenas, Tony

Cartwright, Matthew

Castor, Kathy

Christensen, Donna M.,

Chu, Judy

Cicilline, David

Clarke, Yvette D.

Clay Jr., William "Lacy"

Cleaver, Emanuel

Cohen, Steve

Conyers Jr., John

Courtney, Joe

Cummings, Elijah

Davis, Danny K.

DeFazio, Peter

DeLauro, Rosa L.

Deutch, Ted

Duckworth, Tammy

Edwards, Donna F.

Ellison, Keith

Eshoo, Anna G.

Faleomavaega, Eni F. H.

Farr, Sam

Fattah, Chaka

Frankel, Lois

Fudge, Marcia L.

Garamendi, John

Grayson, Alan

Green, Al

Green, Gene

Grijalva, Raul

Gutierrez, Luis

Hahn, Janice

Hastings, Alcee L.

Hinojosa, Rubén

Holt, Rush

Honda, Mike

Huffman, Jared

Jackson Lee, Sheila

Jeffries, Hakeem

Johnson, Eddie Bernice

Johnson, Henry C. "Hank" Jr.

Kaptur, Marcy

Kildee, Daniel

Kirkpatrick, Ann

Langevin, Jim

Lee, Barbara

Lewis, John

Loebsack, David

Lofgren, Zoe

Lowenthal, Alan

Lujan Grisham, Michelle

Lynch, Stephen F.

Maloney, Carolyn

Markey, Ed

Matsui, Doris O.

McDermott, Jim

McGovern, James

Meng, Grace

Michaud, Michael

Moore, Gwen

Nadler, Jerrold

Negrete McLeod, Gloria

Nolan, Rick

Norton, Eleanor Holmes

Pastor, Ed

Payne Jr., Donald

Pingree, Chellie

Pocan, Mark

Rangel, Charles B.

Roybal-Allard, Lucille

Rush, Bobby L.

Ryan, Tim

Sablan, Gregorio

Sanchez, Linda

Scott, Robert C.

Serrano, José E.

Shea-Porter, Carol

Sinema, Kyrsten

Sires, Albio

Slaughter, Louise

Speier, Jackie

Takano, Mark

Thompson, Bennie G.

Tierney, John

Titus, Dina

Tonko, Paul D.

Vargas, Juan

Veasey, Marc

Velázquez, Nydia M.

Waters, Maxine

Watt, Mel

Waxman, Henry

Welch, Peter

Wilson, Frederica



cc: Speaker John Boehner

House Minority Leader Pelosi

Senate Majority Leader Reid

Senate Minority Leader McConnell

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Frauds. Just like Obama. forestpath Apr 2013 #1
+1 MotherPetrie Apr 2013 #39
Obama was never a progressive LiberalFighter Apr 2013 #56
Obviously progressive doesn't mean unrealisitc michigandem58 Apr 2013 #108
Shysters SamKnause Apr 2013 #2
We need a list of these traitors. 99Forever Apr 2013 #3
The link to the list is in the article, but I'll reproduce the list here unrepentant progress Apr 2013 #5
oh my effing dawg. Chellie Pingree is on that list. magical thyme Apr 2013 #9
Gwen Moore & Mark Pocan too. Arrrgh! Jackpine Radical Apr 2013 #58
they both signed the CPC letter though. PeaceNikki Apr 2013 #70
I most certainly hope you're right. Jackpine Radical Apr 2013 #73
Gwen inspires me. PeaceNikki Apr 2013 #75
Wow! That shocked me too. Lifelong Protester Apr 2013 #104
I see my Rep is on that list. SheilaT Apr 2013 #19
You should, but also see if he's signed this statement: PeaceNikki Apr 2013 #20
Nope. SheilaT Apr 2013 #25
Oh, boo. :( Only 10 of the 47 didn't. PeaceNikki Apr 2013 #29
Then why not sign that Grayson thing? gateley Apr 2013 #79
you know very well I cannot answer for any, let alone 47 of them. PeaceNikki Apr 2013 #80
it's not a grover norquisty pledge. it's a pledge not to cut social security. HiPointDem Apr 2013 #85
I agree PeaceNikki Apr 2013 #87
I don't. The norquisty pledge is working for the pubs. Too bad our team can't even take a stand HiPointDem Apr 2013 #88
I am taking a stand. Most of the 47 are civil rights heroes. I will 100% back those 47. graham4anything Apr 2013 #96
Alan and Ron Paul seem to have a lot in common. graham4anything Apr 2013 #90
Are equating Alan Grayson with Grover Norquist? neverforget Apr 2013 #92
Blood oaths? How Ron Paulish. graham4anything Apr 2013 #93
You can't even answer the question neverforget Apr 2013 #94
Alan Grayson voted twice as the only democratic officeholder with Ron Paul FOR austerity. graham4anything Apr 2013 #95
You didn't answer the question. sabrina 1 Apr 2013 #97
47 -most are civil rights heroes which is far more important issue to the Democratic party. graham4anything Apr 2013 #99
so do you & the boggers. HiPointDem Apr 2013 #98
phew! Chellie signed it. magical thyme Apr 2013 #103
That is truly a show-stopper Samantha Apr 2013 #45
Wtf????? tblue Apr 2013 #59
I am going to call them and thank them for not caving to the 5%. graham4anything Apr 2013 #71
No surprise DJ13 Apr 2013 #82
Shelia Jackson Lee?? Joe Kennedy III??? Jim McDermott??? Charlie Ragel??? WTF???? gateley Apr 2013 #76
47 heroes. 47 people Ron Paul would love to get rid of. graham4anything Apr 2013 #91
Would never have guessed 3. quakerboy Apr 2013 #102
Well, mine is on the list but doesn't require a stern talking to... WhaTHellsgoingonhere Apr 2013 #111
+1 magellan Apr 2013 #6
. ChangeUp106 Apr 2013 #4
I think it's fine as a one-off tactic unrepentant progress Apr 2013 #7
. ChangeUp106 Apr 2013 #8
We've never had to really worry about Social Security being cut before unrepentant progress Apr 2013 #10
But if they vote against SS, we WILL primary them. Squinch Apr 2013 #62
It's called having a boundary... 99Forever Apr 2013 #13
Exactly unrepentant progress Apr 2013 #16
Well said. woo me with science Apr 2013 #49
Thank you Woo... 99Forever Apr 2013 #67
Why not? quakerboy Apr 2013 #100
Mel Watt? Oh hell, no. octoberlib Apr 2013 #11
The four, core principles of the Progressive Promise: magellan Apr 2013 #12
Someone got to them Cali_Democrat Apr 2013 #14
anthrax, anyone? works every time. nt valerief Apr 2013 #38
I think many of them don't want to do anything choie Apr 2013 #61
Oh please let it not be that. tblue Apr 2013 #63
Hopefully no one on this board is still under the delusion that this is indepat Apr 2013 #15
If it isn't apparent to anyone yet, it never will be. raouldukelives Apr 2013 #54
Before everyone freaks out on some of these FINE Democrats, read the CPC statements on CPI PeaceNikki Apr 2013 #17
So why won't 47 of them sign the letter? magellan Apr 2013 #21
I am not sure, we should ask them. But I do not believe for a second that many of those would PeaceNikki Apr 2013 #22
I did read it magellan Apr 2013 #24
Only 10 of those 47 didn't sign the CPC letter. They are: PeaceNikki Apr 2013 #27
Even more interesting magellan Apr 2013 #30
Thanks, that would be cool. Or ask him to reply here!! :) PeaceNikki Apr 2013 #32
Drats, I wish I'd thought of that magellan Apr 2013 #35
I have severe "Representative envy" of you and many others. PeaceNikki Apr 2013 #36
Oh my magellan Apr 2013 #46
I had the same reaction dflprincess Apr 2013 #55
Ben Ray Lujan SheilaT Apr 2013 #47
Oh, thanks for clarifying!! PeaceNikki Apr 2013 #48
Let us know what he says... haikugal Apr 2013 #68
These Representatives need a MILLION telephone calls a day until these cuts are DEFEATED. Faryn Balyncd Apr 2013 #18
Okay, here's the text of my email: SheilaT Apr 2013 #23
Nicely stated magellan Apr 2013 #31
The Ides of April is definitely here villager Apr 2013 #26
the whole pledge thingy is bullshit... spanone Apr 2013 #28
By their fruits ye shall know them jsr Apr 2013 #33
Wait a minute... PennsylvaniaMatt Apr 2013 #34
I do not agree with your unsupported assertion that willingness to compromise and Bluenorthwest Apr 2013 #66
Well, A Gallup poll backs up my claim about the GOP and the notion of "compromise" PennsylvaniaMatt Apr 2013 #72
You don't compromise with destroying 80 years of Democratic policies, period. duffyduff Apr 2013 #106
point taken daybranch Apr 2013 #78
You seem to be in the minority here... cheapdate Apr 2013 #86
Time for me to call Marc Pocan. AllyCat Apr 2013 #37
He signed the CPC letter... PeaceNikki Apr 2013 #41
they need to be primaried in 2014 then if they're up for election stupidicus Apr 2013 #40
+100000 woo me with science Apr 2013 #50
At a minimum, yes Demo_Chris Apr 2013 #60
ridiculous. how many of those representatives do you know anything about? PeaceNikki Apr 2013 #83
I'll leave that up to their constituents to determine stupidicus Apr 2013 #107
You mean like the Norquist pledge? That's a stupid idea, to sign a promise against some future event Honeycombe8 Apr 2013 #42
I didn't see your post before I posted my own. randome Apr 2013 #65
But it's not some vague future event unrepentant progress Apr 2013 #89
I'm against the Norquist pledge, and anything like it. Which this would be. For one thing... Honeycombe8 Apr 2013 #110
jerks hog Apr 2013 #43
Of the N.J. names, Holt is the biggest surprise. jerseyjack Apr 2013 #44
WTF? I thought double negatives (..WON'T promise to NOT cut..) are supposed to be positive?? 99th_Monkey Apr 2013 #51
I guess 'Progressive' doesn't mean what it used to mean. nt valerief Apr 2013 #52
I'm more interested in action than in loyalty oaths. winter is coming Apr 2013 #53
This is why I'm pondering giving up on voting at all... PinkFloyd Apr 2013 #57
* Sigh * randome Apr 2013 #69
They should no more promise this than Republicans should pledge not to raise taxes. randome Apr 2013 #64
Of course. Congressmen take a pledge to uphold the Constitution.. mountain grammy Apr 2013 #81
Great Now we have PINOs Pregressives In Name Only diabeticman Apr 2013 #74
Maybe they are being realistic about the big picture. Hoyt Apr 2013 #77
Congressional Progressives for/against the SS cpi gimmick! ReRe Apr 2013 #84
So the question needs to be asked; what, exactly, do they see their "progress" leading towards? Scootaloo Apr 2013 #101
I have been telling you we have a government run by and for gangsters duffyduff Apr 2013 #105
You think they "aren't Democrats" because they didn't sign this? Bullshit. How many do you know? PeaceNikki Apr 2013 #109
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»47 members of Congression...»Reply #22