Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: 47 members of Congressional Progressive Caucus won't promise not to cut Social Security and Medicare [View all]PeaceNikki
(27,985 posts)22. I am not sure, we should ask them. But I do not believe for a second that many of those would
support cuts. Read the letter that they DID sign their names to:
http://cpc.grijalva.house.gov/press-releases/progressive-caucus-cochairs-statement-to-president-obama-social-security-benefit-cuts-hurt-our-economy1/
4/5/13
Washington, D.C. Congressional Progressive Caucus Co-Chairs Reps. Raúl M. Grijalva (D-AZ) and Keith Ellison (D-MN) released the following statement today responding to reports that President Obama will include chained CPI in his annual budget.
Republicans have been trying to dismantle Social Security ever since President Roosevelt proposed it during the Great Depression. We should not try to bargain for their good will with policies that hurt our seniors, especially since theyve been unwilling to reduce tax loopholes for millionaires and wealthy corporations by so much as a dime.
One hundred seven Members of the House of Representatives, a majority of the Democratic Caucus, have already stated our vigorous opposition to cutting Social Security, Medicare, or Medicaid benefits. Americans all over the country depend on every single dollar they get from Social Security to put food on the table and pay for housing. Using chained CPI will shift more costs onto already struggling American families, seniors, veterans including our 3.2 million disabled veterans who also depend on the Social Security calculation for their Veterans Affairs benefits individuals with disabilities, and children on survivors benefits.
This week, a new study from the New America Foundation finds that proposals to cut Social Security benefits could be disastrous for our economy because the recession has led more seniors to rely to Social Security for income. Cutting benefits now, when people are already struggling to make ends meet, will mean unnecessary hardship for millions of people. It is unpopular, unwise and unworkable.
The text of the Feb. 15 Schakowsky-Conyers- Grijalva-Ellison-Edwards letter opposing chained CPI is below.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
February 15, 2013
Dear President Obama:
We want to thank you for standing strong in the American Taxpayer Relief Act to protect Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid from benefit cuts that would jeopardize the well-being of millions of Americans.
We write to affirm our vigorous opposition to cutting Social Security, Medicare, or Medicaid benefits in any final bill to replace sequestration. Earned Social Security and Medicare benefits provide the financial and health protections necessary to keep individuals and families out of poverty. Medicaid is not only a lifeline for low-income children, pregnant women, people with disabilities and families, it is the primary source of long-term care services and supports for 3.6 million individuals. We cannot overstate their importance for our constituents and our country.
That is why we remain deeply opposed to proposals to reduce Social Security benefits through use of the chained CPI to calculate cost-of-living adjustments. We remain committed to making the changes that will extend solvency for 75 years, but Social Security has not contributed to our current fiscal problems and it should not be on the bargaining table.
Similarly, we oppose proposals to increase Medicare cost-sharing requirements or to raise the age of eligibility. Half of all Medicare recipients live on less than $22,000 a year yet they spend, on average, three times as much of those limited incomes on health care as other Americans. Raising their already heavy cost-sharing burden or increasing the age of eligibility doesnt lower health care costs, it just shifts them to those who can least afford more financial burdens seniors, people with disabilities and their families.
A commitment to keeping the middle-class strong and reducing poverty requires a commitment to keeping Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid strong. We urge you to reject any proposals to cut benefits, and we look forward to working with you to enact approaches that instead rely on economic growth and more fair revenue-raising policies to solve our fiscal problems.
Sincerely,
Schakowsky, Jan
Ellison, Keith
Grijalva, Raúl M.
Conyers, John
Edwards, Donna
Barber, Ron
Bass, Karen
Bera, Ami
Bonamici, Suzanne
Brady, Robert
Braley, Bruce L.
Brown, Corrine
Brownley, Julia
Bustos, Cheri
Butterfield, G.K.
Capps, Lois
Cardenas, Tony
Cartwright, Matthew
Castor, Kathy
Christensen, Donna M.,
Chu, Judy
Cicilline, David
Clarke, Yvette D.
Clay Jr., William "Lacy"
Cleaver, Emanuel
Cohen, Steve
Conyers Jr., John
Courtney, Joe
Cummings, Elijah
Davis, Danny K.
DeFazio, Peter
DeLauro, Rosa L.
Deutch, Ted
Duckworth, Tammy
Edwards, Donna F.
Ellison, Keith
Eshoo, Anna G.
Faleomavaega, Eni F. H.
Farr, Sam
Fattah, Chaka
Frankel, Lois
Fudge, Marcia L.
Garamendi, John
Grayson, Alan
Green, Al
Green, Gene
Grijalva, Raul
Gutierrez, Luis
Hahn, Janice
Hastings, Alcee L.
Hinojosa, Rubén
Holt, Rush
Honda, Mike
Huffman, Jared
Jackson Lee, Sheila
Jeffries, Hakeem
Johnson, Eddie Bernice
Johnson, Henry C. "Hank" Jr.
Kaptur, Marcy
Kildee, Daniel
Kirkpatrick, Ann
Langevin, Jim
Lee, Barbara
Lewis, John
Loebsack, David
Lofgren, Zoe
Lowenthal, Alan
Lujan Grisham, Michelle
Lynch, Stephen F.
Maloney, Carolyn
Markey, Ed
Matsui, Doris O.
McDermott, Jim
McGovern, James
Meng, Grace
Michaud, Michael
Moore, Gwen
Nadler, Jerrold
Negrete McLeod, Gloria
Nolan, Rick
Norton, Eleanor Holmes
Pastor, Ed
Payne Jr., Donald
Pingree, Chellie
Pocan, Mark
Rangel, Charles B.
Roybal-Allard, Lucille
Rush, Bobby L.
Ryan, Tim
Sablan, Gregorio
Sanchez, Linda
Scott, Robert C.
Serrano, José E.
Shea-Porter, Carol
Sinema, Kyrsten
Sires, Albio
Slaughter, Louise
Speier, Jackie
Takano, Mark
Thompson, Bennie G.
Tierney, John
Titus, Dina
Tonko, Paul D.
Vargas, Juan
Veasey, Marc
Velázquez, Nydia M.
Waters, Maxine
Watt, Mel
Waxman, Henry
Welch, Peter
Wilson, Frederica
cc: Speaker John Boehner
House Minority Leader Pelosi
Senate Majority Leader Reid
Senate Minority Leader McConnell
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
111 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
47 members of Congressional Progressive Caucus won't promise not to cut Social Security and Medicare [View all]
unrepentant progress
Apr 2013
OP
The link to the list is in the article, but I'll reproduce the list here
unrepentant progress
Apr 2013
#5
it's not a grover norquisty pledge. it's a pledge not to cut social security.
HiPointDem
Apr 2013
#85
I don't. The norquisty pledge is working for the pubs. Too bad our team can't even take a stand
HiPointDem
Apr 2013
#88
I am taking a stand. Most of the 47 are civil rights heroes. I will 100% back those 47.
graham4anything
Apr 2013
#96
Alan Grayson voted twice as the only democratic officeholder with Ron Paul FOR austerity.
graham4anything
Apr 2013
#95
47 -most are civil rights heroes which is far more important issue to the Democratic party.
graham4anything
Apr 2013
#99
Shelia Jackson Lee?? Joe Kennedy III??? Jim McDermott??? Charlie Ragel??? WTF????
gateley
Apr 2013
#76
Well, mine is on the list but doesn't require a stern talking to...
WhaTHellsgoingonhere
Apr 2013
#111
We've never had to really worry about Social Security being cut before
unrepentant progress
Apr 2013
#10
Before everyone freaks out on some of these FINE Democrats, read the CPC statements on CPI
PeaceNikki
Apr 2013
#17
I am not sure, we should ask them. But I do not believe for a second that many of those would
PeaceNikki
Apr 2013
#22
These Representatives need a MILLION telephone calls a day until these cuts are DEFEATED.
Faryn Balyncd
Apr 2013
#18
I do not agree with your unsupported assertion that willingness to compromise and
Bluenorthwest
Apr 2013
#66
Well, A Gallup poll backs up my claim about the GOP and the notion of "compromise"
PennsylvaniaMatt
Apr 2013
#72
You don't compromise with destroying 80 years of Democratic policies, period.
duffyduff
Apr 2013
#106
You mean like the Norquist pledge? That's a stupid idea, to sign a promise against some future event
Honeycombe8
Apr 2013
#42
I'm against the Norquist pledge, and anything like it. Which this would be. For one thing...
Honeycombe8
Apr 2013
#110
WTF? I thought double negatives (..WON'T promise to NOT cut..) are supposed to be positive??
99th_Monkey
Apr 2013
#51
They should no more promise this than Republicans should pledge not to raise taxes.
randome
Apr 2013
#64
So the question needs to be asked; what, exactly, do they see their "progress" leading towards?
Scootaloo
Apr 2013
#101
You think they "aren't Democrats" because they didn't sign this? Bullshit. How many do you know?
PeaceNikki
Apr 2013
#109