Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)

4. It would be different if the charges weren't a significant markup from the newsstand price.

Reply to GodlessBiker (Reply #3)

Thu Apr 11, 2013, 08:21 PM

Apr 2013

They should charge far LESS for online news, in fact, since they don't have to pay the costs of printing and daily hard-copy distribution.

Also, it represents rationing-by-technology, with access to news increasingly limited to those with both money AND internet availability.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

13 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The "List of Shame"-Post newspaper websites that have gone to "metered reading" or behind a paywall. [View all] Ken Burch Apr 2013 OP

Los Angeles Times kestrel91316 Apr 2013 #1

Ya know... sendero Apr 2013 #2

I don't think it's any more shameful to charge ... GodlessBiker Apr 2013 #3

It would be different if the charges weren't a significant markup from the newsstand price. Ken Burch Apr 2013 #4

Our library has begun buying subscriptions Robb Apr 2013 #6

perhaps we should subsudize "news cafes" where the subscriptions would be paid for Ken Burch Apr 2013 #7

I would pay for the L.A. times feed if they gave a clue about the price. olddots Apr 2013 #5

I really can't blame newspapers for creating a paywall Travis_0004 Apr 2013 #8

I don't fault newspapers for charging, Downwinder Apr 2013 #9

The Milwaukee Rag - Journal Sentinel - who's only redeeming quality is John Gurda PeaceNikki Apr 2013 #10

LOL, shame? Trying to make a profit? Buy the damn paper version and they will keep it free. n-t Logical Apr 2013 #11

This is OUTRAGEOUS. How dare these people not work for free. (nt) Nye Bevan Apr 2013 #12

The NYT does that. Don't they all? They have to make money. Honeycombe8 Apr 2013 #13