Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
10. Oh please,
Fri Apr 12, 2013, 12:25 PM
Apr 2013

"President Obama could have used his bully pulpit to rally the public around issues of poverty, inequality and corporate malfeasance. He's had no problem throwing trillions at bailouts. "

...give me a fucking break. It's like people are taking one sucky proposal in a massive budget to define the Obama Presidency in terms of "bailouts"? The bailout was Bush's, the guy who wrecked the economy. The President's stimulus actually rolled back about $300 billion of the bailout.

Anyone who doesn't see the biggest expansion of Medicaid since it was implemented as helping the poor isn't thinking clearly.

President Obama actually did something to address the inequality, raising taxes on the top one percent (higher than the Clinton rate with the health care tax included) and increasing capital gains to its highest level since the mid 90s. The total effect is significant.

Pre Bush tax cuts: lowest tax bracket 15 percent and top tax bracket 39.6 percent.
Bush tax cuts: lowest tax bracket 10 percent and top tax bracket 35 percent.
President Obama's tax deal, lowest rate 10 percent, top rate 39.6 percent.

Do the math and it will show that the gap between someone earning $50,000 and someone earning $500,000 closed to more than what it was in the 1990s.

Add the health care law tax and the gap closes even more.

<...>

Perhaps the best prism through which to see the Democrats’ gains is inequality. In the 2008 campaign, Mr. Obama said that his top priority as president would be to “create bottom-up economic growth” and reduce inequality...In the 2009 stimulus, he insisted on making tax credits “fully refundable,” so that even people who did not make enough to pay much federal tax would benefit. The 2010 health care law overhaul was probably the biggest attack on inequality since it began rising in the 1970s, increasing taxes on businesses and the rich to pay for health insurance largely for the middle class.

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/03/us/politics/for-obama-fiscal-deal-is-a-victory-that-also-holds-risks.html


The biggest progressive gripe about the legislation is that Mr. Obama extracted less revenue from the affluent than expected — about $600 billion versus $800 billion over the next decade. In perspective, however, this isn’t that big a deal. Put it this way: A reasonable estimate is that gross domestic product over the next 10 years will be around $200 trillion. So if the revenue take had matched expectations, it would still have amounted to only 0.4 percent of G.D.P.; as it turned out, this was reduced to 0.3 percent. Either way, it wouldn’t make much difference in the fights over revenue versus spending still to come.

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/04/opinion/kurgman-battles-of-the-budget.html

That also doesn't take the additional health care tax into account.

Krugman: Obama and Redistribution
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022224304

HHS finalizes rule guaranteeing 100 percent funding for new Medicaid beneficiaries
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022584523

Who Benefits from the ACA Medicaid Expansion?

A key element of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) is the expansion of Medicaid to nearly all individuals with incomes up to 138 percent of the federal poverty level (FPL) ($15,415 for an individual; $26,344 for a family of three in 2012) in 2014. Medicaid currently provides health coverage for over 60 million individuals, including 1 in 4 children, but low parent eligibility levels and restrictions in eligibility for other adults mean that many low income individuals remain uninsured. The ACA expands coverage by setting a national Medicaid eligibility floor for nearly all groups. By 2016, Medicaid, along with the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP), will cover an additional 17 million individuals, mostly low-income adults, leading to a significant reduction in the number of uninsured people.

Medicaid does not cover many low-income adults today. To qualify for Medicaid prior to health reform, individuals had to meet financial eligibility criteria and belong to one of the following specific groups: children, parents, pregnant women, people with severe disability, and seniors. Non-disabled adults without dependent children were generally excluded from Medicaid unless the state obtained a waiver to cover them. The federal government sets minimum eligibility levels for each category, which are up to 133% FPL for pregnant women and children but are much lower for parents (under 50% FPL in most states). States have the option to expand coverage to higher incomes, but Medicaid eligibility levels for adults remain very limited (Figure 1). Seventeen states limit Medicaid coverage to parents earning less than 50 percent of poverty ($9,545 for a family of 3), and only eight states provide full Medicaid coverage to other low-income adults. State-by state Medicaid eligibility levels for parents and other adults are available here.



The ACA expands Medicaid to a national floor of 138% of poverty ($15,415 for an individual; $26,344 for a family of three). The threshold is 133% FPL, but 5% of an individual’s income is disregarded, effectively raising the limit to 138% FPL. The expansion of coverage will make many low-income adults newly eligible for Medicaid and reduce the current variation in eligibility levels across states. To preserve the current base of coverage, states must also maintain minimum eligibility levels in place as of March 2010, when the law was signed. This requirement remains in effect until 2014 for adults and 2019 for children. Under the ACA, states also have the option to expand coverage early to low-income adults prior to 2014. To date, eight states (CA, CT, CO, DC, MN, MO, NJ and WA) have taken up this option to extend Medicaid to adults. Nearly all of these states previously provided solely state- or county-funded coverage to some low-income adults. By moving these adults to Medicaid and obtaining federal financing, these states were able to maintain and, in some cases, expand coverage. Together these early expansions covered over half a million adults as of April 2012.

Eligibility requirements for the elderly and persons with disabilities do not change under reform although some individuals with disabilities may become newly eligible under the adult expansion. Lawfully residing immigrants will be eligible for the Medicaid expansion, although many will continue to be subject to a five-year waiting period before they may enroll in coverage. States have the option to eliminate this five-year waiting period for children and pregnant women but not for other adults. Undocumented immigrants will remain ineligible for Medicaid.

- more -

http://www.kff.org/medicaid/quicktake_aca_medicaid.cfm



President Obama signed health care reform into law, which included the biggest expansion of Medicaid since it was implemented. It also strengthened Medicare and gave new benefits to seniors. From the stimulus, to repealing DADT, to health care, student loan (taking banks out of the federal student loan process) and Wall Street reform, he's been reversing a lot of Reagan and Clinton's damaging policies, and he's still got nearly four years to go.

Obama’s stimulus package aids people with disabilities

By Mike Ervin,

<...>

The first is a one-time additional payment of $250 to people who receive Supplemental Security Income (SSI) and other selected Social Security benefits. Many SSI recipients live on less than $10,000 a year, and so this additional income will make a significant difference.

Second, the stimulus package also allocates $500 million to help the Social Security Administration reduce the processing time for claims and appeals decisions. During the Bush years, the number of people awaiting final determination on their Social Security disability claims more than doubled to 755,000. Many were waiting two years or more for determination, without income. Obama’s allocation should help end this disgrace.

<...>

More creatively, Obama provided $140 million to support centers for independent living. These nonresidential centers are run by people with disabilities and are focal points for services and advocacy. There are hundreds of these centers throughout the United States, providing thousands of good jobs for people with disabilities and others in their communities.

The stimulus package will also invest in the future by providing $540 million for vocational rehabilitation programs, which assist people with disabilities in obtaining higher education and jobs.

- more -

http://progressive.org/mag/mpervin030509.html

The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act included a number of provisions of particular concern to people with disabilities.

•The Act included $500 million to help the Social Security Administration reduce its backlog in processing disability applications;
•The Act supplied $12.2 billion in funding to the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA);
•The Act also provided $87 billion to states to bolster their Medicaid programs during the downturn; and,
•The Act provided over $500 million in funding for vocational rehabilitation services to help with job training, education and placement.
•The Act provided over $140 million in funding for independent living centers across the country.

http://www.whitehouse.gov/issues/disabilities


Senate Republicans Unanimously Support Repeal of Student Loan Reform Law

By Josh Israel

All 45 Senate Republicans voted Friday for a budget amendment that endorsed the repeal of both Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010. While Congressional Republicans attempting to repeal Obamacare is nothing new — this marks the 39th repeal attempt — this proposal also aimed to repeal the student loan reform and Pell Grant expansions that were enacted at the same time.

All 54 Senate Democrats present successfully voted to defeat the amendment, offered by Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX). If passed, it would have put the Senate on record in support of a repeal of
provisions that moved student loans from commercial banks to direct lending from the U.S. Education Department and:

  • Used half of the the estimated $61 billion in savings to increase the maximum annual Pell Grant scholarship to $5,550 in 2010 and to $5,975 by 2017, while indexing the grants to inflation.

  • Lowered monthly payments on federal student loans and shortened the debt forgiveness timeline. For new loans after 2014, this will mean graduates will have to pay 10 percent of disposable income, instead of 15.

  • Provided $2.55 billion to support historically black colleges and universities and minority-serving institutions; $2 billion for community colleges; and $750 million for a college access and completion program for students.
Such a repeal would have meant a return to larger payments, smaller Pell Grants, and reduced support colleges and universities while putting billions of dollars back in the coffers of Wall Street banks. But in his floor speech explaining the amendment, Cruz told his colleagues only that his proposal was about defunding and repealing Obamacare, making no mention of the billions of dollars he would take from higher education to give back to for-profit banks.

Though every Congressional Republican voted against the health care and student loan reforms, House Republicans specifically exempted the student loan reform provisions from previous repeal attempts, though they have repeatedly slammed the reform as a “Washington takeover” of the student loan industry.

- more -

http://thinkprogress.org/education/2013/03/22/1762921/senate-republicans-unanimously-support-repeal-of-student-loan-reform-law/


Want to talk about Wall Street reform, which expanded the FDIC's powers and created the CFPB?

Granted the chained CPI proposal sucks, there are a number of other proposals in the President's budget that help the poor and middle class and raises taxes on the rich and corporations.

Obama budget is a disaster for drugmakers
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022660318

President Obama's Tax Proposals in his Fiscal 2014 Budget Plan
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022659823

Obama budget adds domestic same-sex partners to Obamacare
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022656561

A Budget Focus on Inequality
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022650258

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

You would sing a different song if you were a big bank! immoderate Apr 2013 #1
Wow! You beat the think tank herd to the first comment! Nice job! grahamhgreen Apr 2013 #82
Could you please edit this post? eridani Apr 2013 #150
Done. In my mind I see a think tank cubicle cluster dedicated to first post response on DU. grahamhgreen Apr 2013 #172
Not in my case. It's just my policy to request edits before alerting eridani Apr 2013 #178
Watch out. I got slapped down for using a term like that last week. SylviaD Apr 2013 #158
agreed, 100 percent.... mike_c Apr 2013 #2
I am surprised. In precisely the way that Lessig described his disappointment. cali Apr 2013 #3
I think I am in a state of grief over this. Also, I have problems even understanding it. CTyankee Apr 2013 #155
Nothing will get done for two more years if the process doesn't get underway. randome Apr 2013 #4
that is so not my point, but never mind. I'm done with people cali Apr 2013 #8
I don't know about the 'deliberate' part. Maybe I'm just obtuse? randome Apr 2013 #13
Maybe I'm just obtuse? Clearly, you know the answer to that by now, randome. JDPriestly Apr 2013 #89
"Deliberate obtuseness." Exactly right. AnotherMcIntosh Apr 2013 #25
I think the President and the Democratic Party blew a huge opportunity... kentuck Apr 2013 #5
Exactly n/t Jade Fox Apr 2013 #34
Agreed and very well put I might add lobezen Apr 2013 #35
Exactly. The Republican party has been a disaster the last 5 years newthinking Apr 2013 #120
another 40 years? daybranch Apr 2013 #147
Forty years? Yes Lydia Leftcoast Apr 2013 #163
Precisely Sherman A1 Apr 2013 #148
The problem is that Obama and third-way Dems have much more in common with the GOP NorthCarolina Apr 2013 #167
Both you and kentuck got this one exactly right. n/t Egalitarian Thug Apr 2013 #184
No, no, no. It's not a mystery at all. woo me with science Apr 2013 #6
"The answer is corporate purchase of government." zeemike Apr 2013 #40
Hear! Hear! nt snappyturtle Apr 2013 #58
Spot on. JEB Apr 2013 #60
That's it in a nutshell. n/t ljm2002 Apr 2013 #80
"The answer is corporate purchase of government." Very true, but since the bought-off and Nay Apr 2013 #84
Since Wealth Rules, Progressives with enough Power LarryNM Apr 2013 #98
But the corporations can't purchase a candidate who isn't for sale lbrtbell Apr 2013 #114
They can destroy one, though. nt woo me with science Apr 2013 #115
They purchase them before they are in office. They choose our candidates and then fund them sabrina 1 Apr 2013 #175
As an intellectual exercise, just assume for a moment ... Laelth Apr 2013 #152
Yes. nt LWolf Apr 2013 #161
You would feel even more betrayed if you realized Yo_Mama Apr 2013 #7
Spot on, cali. n/t 99Forever Apr 2013 #9
Oh please, ProSense Apr 2013 #10
more bullshit with lots of links that are not germane. boring bullshit. cali Apr 2013 #14
The OP is bullshit. ProSense Apr 2013 #15
opportunistic? now you're even more ridiculous cali Apr 2013 #26
Wait ProSense Apr 2013 #63
The Obama tax cuts of 2010 lowered taxes on the rich, exactly as Bush did. merrily Apr 2013 #122
It's 2013 Rosa Luxemburg Apr 2013 #141
I knew that, but you knew I knew that. Did you have a point? merrily Apr 2013 #143
thank you, ProSense! n/m Cha Apr 2013 #91
Did bush tell the AG DiverDave Apr 2013 #104
what exactly was 'bullshit' there? Whisp Apr 2013 #33
And astute annalise zeemike Apr 2013 #43
Not only are they not germaine, they are circular demwing Apr 2013 #46
I know, it's bizarre. Marr Apr 2013 #185
that one is a Pro Skittles Apr 2013 #72
Secret: ProSense Apr 2013 #92
it goes beyond that and you know it Skittles Apr 2013 #108
? n/t ProSense Apr 2013 #109
One 'suck' proposal?? Didn't we just get past the Monsanto rider? sabrina 1 Apr 2013 #20
+1 cali Apr 2013 #21
Exactly correct. Thank you. JEB Apr 2013 #61
+1000000 "One" corporate, predatory proposal? Only ONE???? woo me with science Apr 2013 #83
Precisely right! n/t markpkessinger Apr 2013 #133
The 6 month funding bill had some bennies for the gun folks, as well as Monsanto. merrily Apr 2013 #144
Well, all is fine and good about medicaid expansion as long as snappyturtle Apr 2013 #64
Predictable! Wind Dancer Apr 2013 #68
KILLING it. As usual. Number23 Apr 2013 #100
You must have forgotten that Bush said he would not release TARP II unless Obama asked him to do so. merrily Apr 2013 #121
"One sucky proposal" . . . that happens to be utterly, morally perverse n/t markpkessinger Apr 2013 #127
Really. Well how do you account for this? Marr Apr 2013 #186
"no budget he sends to this Congress has a chance of being passed" TheProgressive Apr 2013 #11
Good question! randome Apr 2013 #18
No, politics is that if you are Democrat and you are elected by mostly Democrats and you want your sabrina 1 Apr 2013 #24
An excellent summary, Sabrina. Over and over again, the only rational conclusion is that Nay Apr 2013 #81
We trusted him. He doesn't even acknowledge those who elected him. His spokesperson's only sabrina 1 Apr 2013 #107
Exactly treestar Apr 2013 #54
Some examples might be appropriate here quakerboy Apr 2013 #87
This site is setting out details treestar Apr 2013 #119
You mean the Democratic things? What about them? merrily Apr 2013 #124
Republican administrations have had progressive components in their policy too newthinking Apr 2013 #125
"Why does Obama choose republican policies to move forward?" kentuck Apr 2013 #19
"Why does Obama choose republican policies to move forward?" SammyWinstonJack Apr 2013 #47
This is exactly what I think. He is much more charismatic than The Boner. Push rhett o rick Apr 2013 #96
his eloquence works against him Enrique Apr 2013 #12
To be fair I will blast Obama as I have blasted his cohorts and his predecessors in the past who avaistheone1 Apr 2013 #16
True, Bill and Hillary Clinton do it too. merrily Apr 2013 #129
K&R forestpath Apr 2013 #17
Well said. He promised "change". We got deal making Politics as Usual. Tierra_y_Libertad Apr 2013 #22
Pres. Obama is not the man he said he was LuvNewcastle Apr 2013 #23
He hasn't changed the system, but he has entrenched it! newthinking Apr 2013 #134
.. NorthCarolina Apr 2013 #187
that saying if you don't learn from history you are bound to repeat it Whisp Apr 2013 #27
I don't think he's evil. I find him personally likeable. cali Apr 2013 #28
I would bet a lot that close to 100% of posters here were sure he was going to be a wonderful merrily Apr 2013 #126
that's not true, the 100%. not even close. Whisp Apr 2013 #128
I don't believe that. merrily Apr 2013 #131
K&R Arctic Dave Apr 2013 #29
worshippers are mounting a full court press today nt msongs Apr 2013 #30
+1 n/t markpkessinger Apr 2013 #130
Republicans love "negotiating" with this President... kentuck Apr 2013 #31
the funny thing is, I can see history judging him quite harshly cali Apr 2013 #32
So can I, especially in light of the enormous, almost insurmountable problems the planet and Nay Apr 2013 #86
approval ratings impact will be interesting to see carolinayellowdog Apr 2013 #102
HUGE K & R !!! WillyT Apr 2013 #36
With the exception of LGBT issues - Hell Hath No Fury Apr 2013 #37
Interesting. kentuck Apr 2013 #39
Lesser of 2 evils Gary 50 Apr 2013 #38
Ever is a long time. zeemike Apr 2013 #44
As I do feel about our Harper and Martin. ConcernedCanuk Apr 2013 #41
K&R Agree with every word. MotherPetrie Apr 2013 #42
Apparently, it's only okay to propose your crazy-ass fantasy budget if you're a Republican. winter is coming Apr 2013 #45
Quelle surprise!!!! Beacool Apr 2013 #48
Let me offer you some equations DonCoquixote Apr 2013 #85
They can do whatever they want. Beacool Apr 2013 #94
Its kinda funny quakerboy Apr 2013 #88
Well, Biden said it himself at one time. Beacool Apr 2013 #95
Biden aint always right either quakerboy Apr 2013 #99
So true. CalFresh Apr 2013 #112
Well said walkerbait41 Apr 2013 #49
If we had voted hard for a Democratic House, he would not be in this concrete The Wielding Truth Apr 2013 #50
"The fight for democracy must be bigger & smarter & more constant than the creep and surge of greed" marions ghost Apr 2013 #71
Fighting means letting your leader lead and supporting his method.It will not happen unless revenue The Wielding Truth Apr 2013 #111
Responding to your points: marions ghost Apr 2013 #118
My answer to your numbered responses are:. The Wielding Truth Apr 2013 #180
"Fighting means letting your leader lead and supporting his method." woo me with science Apr 2013 #149
Let him do his work. Sucking up all the oxygen will not help. He is doing his best. The Wielding Truth Apr 2013 #181
Come again? woo me with science Apr 2013 #182
Your wish list is mine, too, but we did not elect the superman that you want. In our post Bush/ The Wielding Truth Apr 2013 #188
Oh, I see the problem here. woo me with science Apr 2013 #189
This is not rhetoric and you have not diagnosed any problem. You have refused to see that politics is The Wielding Truth Apr 2013 #191
We did . . . markpkessinger Apr 2013 #135
I'm talking about the off year when we did not overwhelm the ballots boxes. Fall 2010 The Wielding Truth Apr 2013 #179
Not bashing at all. It's all true. bluethruandthru Apr 2013 #51
You felt betrayed by him before he was ever elected. You're like a broken record. MjolnirTime Apr 2013 #52
I was an early and enthusiastic supporter of Obama's right here on DU cali Apr 2013 #55
I don't have to search. I've witnessed what you've been doing here. MjolnirTime Apr 2013 #57
Wow. Your comments to cali are virtually identical to your attaks on Manny. Bluenorthwest Apr 2013 #74
You made a totally false claim and you don't even have the intellectual cali Apr 2013 #79
+1 n/t markpkessinger Apr 2013 #145
Really? Hell Hath No Fury Apr 2013 #70
You're wrong, Cali was an Obama supporter. Beacool Apr 2013 #117
That's contrary to the facts. Only a truly ignorant person could say that about Cali. AnotherMcIntosh Apr 2013 #132
thanks. cali Apr 2013 #183
Er...no. LWolf Apr 2013 #162
He was elected in 2008. You've only been a member here since 2011 Heddi Apr 2013 #190
Oh for God's sake treestar Apr 2013 #53
You sound more broken-hearted than bashing fadedrose Apr 2013 #56
that's true. And honestly, I wish I could have faith, but I've cobbled that together so many cali Apr 2013 #165
Why not stand up for Democratic values? JEB Apr 2013 #59
Think McCain and Romney. Try them on for size. demosincebirth Apr 2013 #62
That thinking does not move us forward marions ghost Apr 2013 #73
"downtrodden" or not, I sleep better with him at the helm. He has not done many of the things demosincebirth Apr 2013 #139
... but they didn't win, Obama did. n/t RKP5637 Apr 2013 #77
Just think if they did. You'd probably be upset about something more serious. I don't agree with demosincebirth Apr 2013 #138
Yep, agree!!! n/t RKP5637 Apr 2013 #142
That's setting the bar very, VERY low n/t markpkessinger Apr 2013 #146
Right On! Rider3 Apr 2013 #65
"...why not stand up for liberal democratic values?" paparush Apr 2013 #66
Agree CTCharlie Apr 2013 #156
Welcome to DU CTCharlie! hrmjustin Apr 2013 #174
Sounds like simple truth to me. lark Apr 2013 #67
One of the questions is: Who elected the president- the people, or the corporations? Gregorian Apr 2013 #69
And this is what makes marions ghost Apr 2013 #75
Obama is a politician. Few people have ever said he truedelphi Apr 2013 #113
US = Failure for "we the people." This is a hallmark of a failing society ... throughout history. RKP5637 Apr 2013 #76
Very well said! ljm2002 Apr 2013 #78
I want my vote back. If he is just going to bow to Republicans and include Romney ideas in the beyurslf Apr 2013 #90
When ProSense Apr 2013 #93
This is not about betrayal this is about a broken system. Blaming Obama rhett o rick Apr 2013 #97
Absolutely marions ghost Apr 2013 #137
November 2011? And you wonder why some might view this as opportunistic? Number23 Apr 2013 #101
there are plenty of current stories. I chose that one because I cali Apr 2013 #106
Yeah. ProSense Apr 2013 #110
I don't. Rex Apr 2013 #103
On the mark, as always DJ13 Apr 2013 #105
because he's not a liberal democrat noiretextatique Apr 2013 #116
"the obvious answer" LWolf Apr 2013 #164
Well said, cali! mother earth Apr 2013 #123
We were are shilling for him CountAllVotes Apr 2013 #136
exactly stupidicus Apr 2013 #169
K & R! nt LeftyLucy22 Apr 2013 #140
Reality check.. DCBob Apr 2013 #151
ending Social Security as we know it, is no way to "bring this country together" nashville_brook Apr 2013 #153
no one is "ending social security".. good grief. DCBob Apr 2013 #154
Thank you Cali. Divernan Apr 2013 #157
That photo is damning... haikugal Apr 2013 #176
"He's better than a Republican." SylviaD Apr 2013 #159
I was a lefty bigot with low expectations for the centrist stupidicus Apr 2013 #160
Whether true believers or paid shills, their extreme positions ARE a catalyst for outrage Divernan Apr 2013 #166
that's the unfulfilled expectation alrighty stupidicus Apr 2013 #168
He's an unmitigated failure. Fuddnik Apr 2013 #170
well, I don't know if I'd go that far stupidicus Apr 2013 #171
What do u want, president Palin? grahamhgreen Apr 2013 #173
no way dude stupidicus Apr 2013 #177
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Do I feel betrayed by thi...»Reply #10