Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

stockholmer

(3,751 posts)
Sat Feb 4, 2012, 06:34 AM Feb 2012

A Torrent of Disinformation : The NeoCon Propaganda Machine Pushing “Regime Change” in Syria [View all]

http://www.counterpunch.org/2012/01/06/the-neocon-propaganda-machine-pushing-%E2%80%9Cregime-change%E2%80%9D-in-syria/

“War with Iran is already here,” wrote a leading Israeli commentator recently, describing “the combination of covert warfare and international pressure” being applied to Iran. Although not mentioned, the “strategic prize” of the first stage of this war on Iran is Syria; the first campaign in a much wider sectarian power-bid. “Other than the collapse of the Islamic Republic itself,” Saudi King Abdullah was reported to have said last summer, “nothing would weaken Iran more than losing Syria.”

By December, senior United States officials were explicit about their regime change agenda for Syria: Tom Donilon, the US National Security Adviser, explained that the “end of the [President Bashar al-] Assad regime would constitute Iran’s greatest setback in the region yet – a strategic blow that will further shift the balance of power in the region against Iran.” Shortly before, a key official in terms of operationalizing this policy, Under Secretary of State for the Near East Jeffrey Feltman, had stated at a congressional hearing that the US would “relentlessly pursue our two-track strategy of supporting the opposition and diplomatically and financially strangling the [Syrian] regime until that outcome is achieved”.

What we are seeing in Syria is a deliberate and calculated campaign to bring down the Assad government so as to replace it with a regime “more compatible” with US interests in the region.

The blueprint for this project is essentially a report produced by the neo-conservative Brookings Institute for regime change in Iran in 2009. The report – “Which Path to Persia?” - continues to be the generic strategic approach for US-led regime change in the region.



snip

---------------------------------------------------------------


Let's Start A War: Anti-Assad Syrian NGOs Working Directly With British Government


http://landdestroyer.blogspot.com/2011/12/syrian-ngos-working-directly-with.html

In May 2011's article "The Siege of Syria," http://landdestroyer.blogspot.com/2011/05/seige-of-syria.html it was reported: "The coverage by the corporate-owned Western media exclusively relies on "activists inside and outside the country," the London-based "Syrian Human Rights Monitoring Centre" which apparently has no web presence, the Damascus Center for Human Rights http://www.dchrs.org/english/news.php?aboutus which boasts memberships with the National Endowment for Democracy and Tides Foundation-funded http://www.fidh.org/-Financial-Statements- International Federation for Human Rights (FIDH) and the Coalition for the International Criminal Court, http://www.iccnow.org/?mod=supporters funded by the European Union, the Ford Foundation, the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, the Open Society Institute, the Sigrid Rausing Trust, and Humanity United.

Humanity United in turn boast http://www.humanityunited.org/all/partners partnerships with the BBC World Service Trust, NED/Open Society/US State Department-funded Benetech, http://www.benetech.org/about/strategic_partners.shtml the Open Society Institute, and the NED-funded http://www.ned.org/where-we-work/middle-east-and-northern-africa/mena-regional Solidarity Center http://www.humanityunited.org/all/partners/page:8 which mobilized Egypt's labor unions http://landdestroyer.blogspot.com/2011/02/who-are-egypts-protesters_09.html just as the US-stoked unrest began to falter. In other words, every organization involved interlocks with the vast corporate/foundation-funded imperial network masquerading as individual "human rights organizations" and benign NGOs. In reality this "civil society" network seeks to supplant national governments, and interface with global "institutions" like the IMF, World Bank, and the UN, all of which have been contrived by corporate-financier oligarchs. It is a modern day empire in the making."

The US National Endowment for Democracy's journal, Democracy Digest, would report in their August 2011 article titled, "Syrian military ‘strained’, http://www.demdigest.net/blog/2011/08/syrian-military-strained-as-clinton-meets-opposition-activists/ as Clinton meets opposition activists," (warning: link automatically plays very loud video clip) that the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights made one of many joint statements with the above mentioned US-funded Damascus Center for Human Rights. Meanwhile, Reuters featured a photograph http://news.yahoo.com/photos/rami-abdelrahman-head-syrian-observatory-human-rights-leaves-photo-195213346.html of the Observatory's head, Rami Abdelrahman, leaving a meeting with the British Foreign Minister William Hague.

It is quite clear that the "Syrian Observatory for Human Rights" based in London and receiving the entirety of their reports via "phone" & YouTube videos from Syria, is working in coordination with both US-funded NGOs and the British Foreign Minister. Considering that Hague similarly coddled Libyan opposition leaders in London http://landdestroyer.blogspot.com/2011/05/libyan-rebels-inspired-by-globalization.html while playing a key role in promoting the NATO attack on Libya and the subsequent installation of a BP oilman as "prime minister," http://landdestroyer.blogspot.com/2011/11/new-libyan-pm-big-oil-goon.html Abdelrahman's consorting signifies a verbatim repeat of the now openly fraudulent and genocidal NATO campaign in Libya. Just as in Libya, where "human rights activists" have now admitted to fabricating the evidence http://landdestroyer.blogspot.com/2011/10/lies-behind-humanitarian-war-in-libya.html used by the International Criminal Court and the United Nations to rubber stamp Wall Street and London's designs for regime change, likewise the "evidence" from Syria has turned out to be a complete fraud, http://landdestroyer.blogspot.com/2011/11/un-report-on-syria-based-on-witness.html derived by opposition "witnesses" and compiled by a corporate D.C. think-tank director http://landdestroyer.blogspot.com/2011/11/syria-nato-genocide-approaches.html into a UN "human rights report."

snip

much more at top link
----------------------------------------------------------------

flashbacks to similar propaganda/psy-ops methods:

(Tom MacMaster, the fake 'Gay Girl in Damascus' blogger's wife is Britta Froelicher, an activist with the American Friends Service Committee, an organization linked to the US intelligence community since the Cold War)

'A Gay Girl in Damascus': how the hoax unfolded


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/syria/8572884/A-Gay-Girl-in-Damascus-how-the-hoax-unfolded.html

Here were examine how events unfolded which led to the diary being exposed as the work of the a married American man studying at the University of Edinburgh:


February 19, 2011: MacMaster posts the first item on the blog, pretending to be Amina Abdallah Arraf al Omari. The first posts introduce the author as a lesbian of American and Syrian parents, born in the US and now living in Damascus.
February to April, 2011: MacMaster gives sporadic updates from his character, ranging from political analysis and hard news accounts of the brutal repression of the country’s pro-democracy movement to love poetry and Mills and Boon-esque homosexual memoirs.


May 7, 2011: Western media start to take notice of the blog. In Britain, The Guardian leads the coverage, reporting: “She is perhaps an unlikely hero of revolt in a conservative country. Female, gay and half-American, Amina Abdullah is capturing the imagination of the Syrian opposition with a blog that has shot to prominence as the protest movement struggles in the face of a brutal government crackdown. Her blog, A Gay Girl in Damascus, is brutally honest, poking at subjects long considered taboo in Arab culture.” The story is accompanied by a photograph purporting to be of Amina. In reality, the image is of Jelena Lecic, a Londoner, and has been lifted off Facebook.


May 2011: As the blog gathers pace and followers, The Guardian arranges a sit down interview with Amina at a café in Damascus but she fails to show up, later claiming that harassment from secret police prevented the meeting. CNN also publishes an email interview with Amina, in which the character was quoted as saying: "A whole lot of long time changes are coming suddenly bubbling to the surface and views towards women, gay people and minorities are rapidly changing,"

snip

------------------------------------------------

The Christian Science Monitor: The Gay Girl in Damascus hoax, 'mass rape' in Libya, and press credulity
Have our propaganda detectors been dulled?


http://www.csmonitor.com/World/Backchannels/2011/0613/The-Gay-Girl-in-Damascus-hoax-mass-rape-in-Libya-and-press-credulity


The Gay Girl in Damascus hoax, 'mass rape' in Libya, and press credulity
Have our propaganda detectors been dulled?

If you don't follow NPR's Andy Carvin on Twitter, let me be the first to tell you that The Gay Girl in Damascus is actually a 40-year-old American guy with a beard.

Through the efforts of Mr. Carvin, Ali Abunimah, and a few others, Thomas MacMaster was unveiled as the hoaxster. Mr. MacMaster said today that his wife, Britta Froelicher – an American listed as an associate fellow at St. Andrew's Center for Syrian Studies – was involved as a consultant. One of the better roundups on how MacMaster was forced into admitting his lies is on Ali Abunimah's Electronic Intifada blog.

But while MacMaster appears to be a garden-variety Internet troll, the Amina persona was boosted by the willingness of the conventional press (The Guardian, CNN, New York Times) and bloggers with major followings, like Andrew Sullivan, to accept what they were being told at face value.

snip

---------------------------------------------------------------

The Atlantic Magazine: Yet another American military operative outed as fake (Paula Brooks, aka 58-year-old former Air Force pilot David Graber)


http://www.theatlanticwire.com/global/2011/06/more-revelations-straight-males-posing-lesbian-bloggers/38796/

Only days after we learned that the author behind A Gay Girl in Damascus was a straight man from Georgia, The Washington Post is reporting http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/blogpost/post/paula-brooks-editor-of-lez-get-real-also-a-man/2011/06/13/AGld2ZTH_blog.html#pagebreak that the purported DC-based lesbian mother who edited the lesbian news site Lez Get Real ("A Gay Girl's View on the World", which re-published Gay Girl in Damascus posts and helped the blog get started, is actually a 58-year-old former Air Force pilot and construction worker from Ohio named Bill Graber (pictured at right).

During interviews about the Gay Girl in Damascus hoax, "Paula Brooks" (Garber's wife's name), claiming she was deaf, initially spoke to Post reporters on the phone through her "father," who finally, after numerous conversations, admitted, "I am Paula Brooks." In perhaps the most surreal part of the story, the Post adds that Garber often flirted online with Gay Girl in Damascus author Tom MacMaster without either man realizing that the other was pretending to be a lesbian. Garber has turned over the site's management to Linda Carbonell, who writes under her maiden name but, we're pretty sure, is a woman. As of this writing, the site appears to be down.

snip
105 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
So hundreds of Syrians weren't killed yesterday by Assad's regime? joshcryer Feb 2012 #1
If there were defecting military units in America, we'd have thousands of people killed here, too. leveymg Feb 2012 #5
Stick to your guns because that is the right question! JackRiddler Feb 2012 #14
if my uncle had a vagina he'd be my aunt nt arely staircase Feb 2012 #25
A small percentage of military folks go Absent WithOut Leave every year. No one dies. stevenleser Feb 2012 #30
The US doesn't typically lay siege to cities that are protesting against the government. joshcryer Feb 2012 #55
well, the neocon checklist is almost complete... inna Feb 2012 #2
Thanks for reminding us of that. It's also similar to the "A Clean Break" (1997) neocon hit list leveymg Feb 2012 #11
Thank you for this important reminder. nt woo me with science Feb 2012 #13
Whatever the neocons are/aren't doing, the Syrian people are certainly pushing for 'regime change'. pampango Feb 2012 #3
The "Syrian people" are divided, and the regime is predominantly Shi'ia. It's a religious civil war leveymg Feb 2012 #6
I want "to take sides" with anyone who a voice in deciding who governs the country. pampango Feb 2012 #7
Syria is as unlike Tunisia as Iran is to Egypt The "Arab Spring" isn't a one-size-fits-all popular leveymg Feb 2012 #9
So it comes down to a brutal dictator or "a genocide waiting to happen". pampango Feb 2012 #10
Those who just want freedom are often the first sacrificed in struggles between ruthless parties leveymg Feb 2012 #12
Allawi, not Shia. nadinbrzezinski Feb 2012 #80
Alawi IS a Shia sect. leveymg Feb 2012 #100
Yeah but they are considered a break away sect nadinbrzezinski Feb 2012 #101
Same difference. leveymg Feb 2012 #102
Not in Syria or to Syrians. nadinbrzezinski Feb 2012 #103
I don't want to get into Intra-Shi'ia theological or doctrinal questions here. leveymg Feb 2012 #104
Nope this is not the place nadinbrzezinski Feb 2012 #105
Well who the hell is killing all the protestors there? Swede Feb 2012 #4
That small segment of the anti-war crowd frames everything as "US is bad and is behind this" stevenleser Feb 2012 #28
U.S. secretly backed Syrian opposition groups, cables released by WikiLeaks show ronnie624 Feb 2012 #98
Is the killing of protestors verifiable? n/t ronnie624 Feb 2012 #97
"unrec" for link to counterpuke MH1 Feb 2012 #8
How convenient for you, blanket dismissal of a publication with about 50 diverse authors. JackRiddler Feb 2012 #15
Your argument can be completely flipped, we also dismiss Free Republic which has dozens of diverse stevenleser Feb 2012 #31
Can be and should be are two different things. JackRiddler Feb 2012 #39
CR can be summarized quite easily. stevenleser Feb 2012 #42
1, 2 and 5 are pretty much true... JackRiddler Feb 2012 #46
I used to love it, back in 2003 hfojvt Feb 2012 #37
"counterpuke" to some, one of the best sources to others. inna Feb 2012 #16
You don't believe the U.S. has a plan for World domination? rudycantfail Feb 2012 #18
Absolutely - starting with Afghanistan bhikkhu Feb 2012 #26
...a lesson nobody seems to rudycantfail Feb 2012 #38
So is "gay girl in Damascus" thrown in there to justify the "disinformation" tag? bhikkhu Feb 2012 #17
What do you think happened in Libya? rudycantfail Feb 2012 #19
NATO and the US helped a popular revolution overthrow a brutal dictator bhikkhu Feb 2012 #24
Your last phrase is the key. To one particular segment of the anti-war crowd it is all about us and stevenleser Feb 2012 #32
Libya was rudycantfail Feb 2012 #35
it's really a not so subtle bigotry arely staircase Feb 2012 #21
It is but with these folks it is unintentional. They have tunnel vision aimed at blaming the US for stevenleser Feb 2012 #34
i know it isn't intentional arely staircase Feb 2012 #36
If you're looking to bomb it, you own a piece of the war. JackRiddler Feb 2012 #40
We hate America first rudycantfail Feb 2012 #41
If you are part of the crowd I am talking about? Yes. nt stevenleser Feb 2012 #43
SUPPORT THE TROOPS rudycantfail Feb 2012 #45
your the one who seems to be supporting some troops nt arely staircase Feb 2012 #49
Fight em over there so we don't have to fight em over here, right? rudycantfail Feb 2012 #48
You can prattle off all the straw men you want.It still wont make my argument what you want it to be stevenleser Feb 2012 #54
There's nothing wrong with rudycantfail Feb 2012 #56
There is nothing wrong with my ignore list either! Enjoy it! nt stevenleser Feb 2012 #58
Okay, but before you do rudycantfail Feb 2012 #59
No, the bigotry is in thinking that those 'poor people' can't have a Revolution without Western sabrina 1 Feb 2012 #61
if by interference you mean helping people remove the man who is murdering them in the streets arely staircase Feb 2012 #63
Well, if you held that position for all the decades the US supported the Assad regime, sabrina 1 Feb 2012 #65
sure, quaddafi's death was horrific. it was certainly recoil-worthy arely staircase Feb 2012 #66
"Bahrain is a bloodbath" = patently dishonest. 60 deaths = 0.004% Bahrain population. joshcryer Feb 2012 #69
Ok I need to ask, when did the Hafez Al Assad regime become nadinbrzezinski Feb 2012 #81
The "gay girl in Damascus" hoax ronnie624 Feb 2012 #99
the syrians seem to be pushing it too arely staircase Feb 2012 #20
"The syrians seem to be pushing it too" rudycantfail Feb 2012 #44
enough that the government is mowing them down in the streets yet they keep showing up arely staircase Feb 2012 #47
Do you think our government rudycantfail Feb 2012 #50
whichever is more effective. nt arely staircase Feb 2012 #51
When you say "our government helping them do it" rudycantfail Feb 2012 #52
is that the most effective way to help the syrians rid themselves of th butcher assad? arely staircase Feb 2012 #53
I appreciate your honesty. n/t rudycantfail Feb 2012 #57
This really is nonsense. Unfortunately, some of the anti-war folks are obsessed with making stevenleser Feb 2012 #22
Right BeFree Feb 2012 #27
That you resort to creating straw men tells everyone all they need to know. stevenleser Feb 2012 #29
LOL, tell me about it! Who is supposed to fall for that, BTW? Poll_Blind Feb 2012 #33
"That everything is the US' fault and is somehow about us." That is not a "philosophy", Fool Count Feb 2012 #60
Hahahaha! Hilarious. Next time though, use the sarcasm tag. nt stevenleser Feb 2012 #64
US doesn't support democracy in Latin America = bad. Supports it in Middle East = bad. joshcryer Feb 2012 #70
If US supported democracy in Middle East, they would be starting with their "friends" - Fool Count Feb 2012 #91
Qatar: Elections in 2013. Jordan: Prime Minister resigned Feb 1st, move to implement democracy. joshcryer Feb 2012 #92
"Having independent dialog for reforms"? What the hell does it even mean? Fool Count Feb 2012 #95
Heh, the insults continue. joshcryer Feb 2012 #96
Why do Americans think that other nations are not capable of solving their own problems? sabrina 1 Feb 2012 #62
No one thinks that. The US doesn't get involved in most disputes. stevenleser Feb 2012 #67
Well, in a way you make the point made by many observers. The US, while claiming to care sabrina 1 Feb 2012 #72
Funny how a lot of the incoherence becomes explicable... woo me with science Feb 2012 #78
The US also supported Ben Ali, Mubarak, Gaddafi. Maybe the key element is internal uprising, huh? joshcryer Feb 2012 #71
Maybe let the Bahrainis speak for themselves: sabrina 1 Feb 2012 #74
They already are speaking for themselves as the independent dialogue shows. joshcryer Feb 2012 #76
Dead Bahrainis are as dead as dead people anywhere else. What is remarkable is how selective sabrina 1 Feb 2012 #79
All people living under autocrats deserve to be free. joshcryer Feb 2012 #83
So go complain about the ones the US is *supporting*. Donald Ian Rankin Feb 2012 #85
I have. See my sig. This OP is about Syria. This OP is showing the bias. joshcryer Feb 2012 #86
Well, there's not much chance of those living under our very good friend, Karamov eg, of ever being sabrina 1 Feb 2012 #87
"ever" is a long time, Karamov will die, they will show self-determination. joshcryer Feb 2012 #88
You are mistaken if you think there is no support for the Syrians. You conflate interference and sabrina 1 Feb 2012 #93
I think there is ample support for the Syrians from those who don't invoke... joshcryer Feb 2012 #94
There is no doubt in my mind western spec ops are nadinbrzezinski Feb 2012 #82
btw i hope the us government is helping topple ASSad arely staircase Feb 2012 #23
The West is Bad, The West is Evil, Blah, Blah, Blah... Odin2005 Feb 2012 #68
"...a deliberate and calculated campaign to bring down the Assad government..." unkachuck Feb 2012 #73
Is it considered liberal or conservative to support hundreds of thousands of demonstrators pampango Feb 2012 #75
Never understood jeanpalmer Feb 2012 #77
You should be ashamed of yourself. Donald Ian Rankin Feb 2012 #84
There are different ways of looking at Western "help." jeanpalmer Feb 2012 #89
I'm afraid I think this post contains at least two really silly statements. Donald Ian Rankin Feb 2012 #90
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»A Torrent of Disinformati...