Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

nessa

(317 posts)
32. This is what the Grand Jury had to say about the lack of inspections...
Fri Apr 12, 2013, 11:44 PM
Apr 2013

pages 147 - 148

Under Governor Robert Casey, she said, the department inspected abortion facilities annually. Yet, when Governor Tom Ridge came in, the attorneys interpreted the same regulations that had permitted annual inspections for years to no longer authorize those inspections. Then, only complaint driven
inspections supposedly were authorized. Staloski said that DOH’s policy during Governor Ridge’s administration was motivated by a desire not to be “putting a barrier up to women” seeking abortions.

Brody confirmed some of what Staloski told the Grand Jury. He described a meeting of high-level government officials in 1999 at which a decision was made not to accept a recommendation to reinstitute regular inspections of abortion clinics. The reasoning, as Brody recalled, was: “there was a concern that if they did routineinspections, that they may find a lot of these facilities didn’t meet [the standards for getting patients out by stretcher or wheelchair in an emergency], and then there would be less abortion facilities, less access to women to have an abortion.”

Brody testified that he did not consider the “access issue” a legal one. The
Abortion Control Act, he told the Grand Jurors, charges DOH with protecting the health
and safety of women having abortions and premature infants aborted alive. To carry out this responsibility, he said, DOH should regularly inspect the facilities.

Nevertheless, the position of DOH remained the same after Edward Rendell
became governor. Using the legally faulty excuse that the department lacked the authority
to inspect abortion clinics, Staloski left them unmonitored, presumably with the
knowledge and blessing of her bosses, Deputy Secretary Stacy Mitchell and a succession
of Secretaries of Health. The department continued its do-nothing policy until 2010,

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

The real story here is economic and political. Lack of funding for abortions for poor women: Cali_Democrat Apr 2013 #1
this case doesn't make much of an argument for anti-choicers, though Spider Jerusalem Apr 2013 #2
I think a big piece of the story is the lack of oversight by state agencies cali Apr 2013 #4
It's an important story. Most local dailies aren't likely to pick up ongoing coverage of the trial Brickbat Apr 2013 #3
Huh? This is not about choice or anti-choice. DURHAM D Apr 2013 #5
No, of course it's not a story about choice cali Apr 2013 #6
Yep. redqueen Apr 2013 #9
The media looked the other way because it is about women. DURHAM D Apr 2013 #13
That's what I think too. nt redqueen Apr 2013 #19
The reason the MSM has not covered it is because the victims don't matter. DURHAM D Apr 2013 #11
that clearly is a significant part of my takeaway, genius. cali Apr 2013 #12
Your title and emphasis is still bogus. DURHAM D Apr 2013 #15
No, they're not bogus. and your saying so doesn't make it true. duh. cali Apr 2013 #17
Your OP takes the side of anti-choicers. DURHAM D Apr 2013 #20
ridiculous. gad. cali Apr 2013 #33
I know you have 78K posts but anyone and everyone is still free DURHAM D Apr 2013 #35
this has jackshit to do with the number of posts. duh. cali Apr 2013 #36
The other victims . . . YarnAddict Apr 2013 #25
Tom Ridge ananda Apr 2013 #7
Agreed. Deep down, every pro-choice person LittleBlue Apr 2013 #8
what? No. I don't look at it that way cali Apr 2013 #14
wrong DURHAM D Apr 2013 #16
"Deep down, every anti-choice person knows REP Apr 2013 #31
The poor end up with the least competent medical help it seems. Cleita Apr 2013 #10
yes. and that this guy had a waiting room for white patients cali Apr 2013 #18
This is one of the reasons why single payer or Medicare for All was promoted Cleita Apr 2013 #21
The non-reporting has nothing to do with the choice/anti-choice angle..it has to do with a gag order msanthrope Apr 2013 #22
I think we aren't hearing about it... ljm2002 Apr 2013 #23
Um, I don't think so YarnAddict Apr 2013 #26
Well you could be right... ljm2002 Apr 2013 #29
it is a brutal murder case. Abortion is only tangentially related. IfPalinisAnswerWatsQ Apr 2013 #24
"18-24 inches long with no eyes, or face"? HockeyMom Apr 2013 #27
I am not suprised. Niceguy1 Apr 2013 #28
Go ahead and ban abortion, antis AnnieBW Apr 2013 #30
This is what the Grand Jury had to say about the lack of inspections... nessa Apr 2013 #32
I've heard about this story since 2011. JaneyVee Apr 2013 #34
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I am staunchly pro-choice...»Reply #32