Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

cali

(114,904 posts)

10. in what way? In what areas?

Reply to hobbit709 (Reply #8)

Sat Apr 13, 2013, 10:27 AM

Apr 2013

And they address such different issues.

I think the 2012 dem platform was pretty progressive. the problem is that the party needs to do more than put up a pretty platform.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

11 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

By todays standards, Eisenhower would have been a great Democrat! [View all] dmosh42 Apr 2013 OP

Want to agree with you but Ike, I think, would have been a DLC Democrat. He had the malignant Dulles byeya Apr 2013 #1

Yes, I agree he had his losers, but then JFK had his MacNamera! dmosh42 Apr 2013 #7

And don't forget we have him to thank for the ouster of Mossadegh in Iran, truebluegreen Apr 2013 #11

The last good Republican president. JaneyVee Apr 2013 #2

There's really no way of knowing, is there? We're products of cali Apr 2013 #3

My point was only that we've gone so right, the fascist are happy! dmosh42 Apr 2013 #9

I doubt he could get elected today...... Little Star Apr 2013 #4

And Obama would be to the right of Nixon n2doc Apr 2013 #5

Obama: Wage and price controls? Don't think so. Wouldn't come up with the EPA either byeya Apr 2013 #6

The 1956 Republican Party platform was well to the left of the 2012 Democratic one. hobbit709 Apr 2013 #8

in what way? In what areas? cali Apr 2013 #10