Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
10. Here
Sat Feb 4, 2012, 11:44 AM
Feb 2012

"While true that there was a dual focus on 'al-Qaeda' in Pakistan and on the Afghan-Pakistan border, there was also the effort to 'push back' the Taliban to 'give room' for the Karzai regime to establish itself. That was the reason given for the escalation of troops by this president into Afghanistan and the escalation of their offensive role. It's just not credible to say that Obama's 'surge' forces were operating primarily against 'al-Qaeda' in Afghanistan because the Pentagon and the commanders in the country all admitted that the number of al-Qaeda in Afghanistan was negligible and insignificant. "

...was the actual reason given for the escalation:

The President’s strategy, as laid out in his address on December 1, 2009, maintains the core goal laid out in the beginning of his administration: to disrupt, dismantle, and defeat al-Qa’ida and prevent its capacity to threaten America and our allies in the future. To accomplish this, he said we would pursue three objectives: denying al-Qa’ida a safe haven, reversing the Taliban's momentum, and strengthening the capacity of Afghanistan's security forces and government so that they can take lead responsibility for Afghanistan's future. He also committed to begin the responsible withdrawal of U.S. troops from Afghanistan beginning in July 2011.

On June 22, the President addressed the American people about the way forward in Afghanistan. We have made substantial progress on the objectives the President laid out at West Point, and he made clear that we will begin the drawdown of U.S. troops from a position of strength. We have exceeded our expectations on our core goal of defeating al-Qa’ida – killing 20 of its top 30 leaders, including Osama bin Laden. We have broken the Taliban’s momentum, and trained over 100,000 Afghan National Security Forces.

The President announced that the United States will withdraw 10,000 U.S. troops from Afghanistan by the end of the year, and that the 33,000 “surge” troops he approved in December 2009 will leave Afghanistan by the summer of 2012.

With this way forward, we are seeking to consolidate the momentum the surge troops have gained over the last 18 months while continuing to train and partner with Afghan National Security Forces as they take the lead. This milestone will allow our commanders the time to responsibly implement a drawdown. As these reductions proceed, our mission will transition from one of combat to support. This is fully consistent with the commitments the United States has made, along with our NATO Allies and partners, to support the Government of Afghanistan as it moves towards full responsibility for security across Afghanistan by the end of 2014.

As the President and President Karzai agreed in May 2010, we will have a strategic partnership between our nations that provides a long-term framework for our bilateral cooperation in the areas of security, economic and social development, and institution building. This will ensure that the United States will be able to target terrorists and support a sovereign Afghan government so that our enemies cannot outlast us. We continue to support an Afghan Government-led process of reconciliation that would bring Afghans together and allow insurgents to come off the battlefield, provided they break from al-Qa’ida, abandon violence, and abide by the Afghan Constitution, including its provisions on respect for the rights of all Afghans, including women.

http://www.whitehouse.gov/issues/defense/afghanistan

The core goal was dismantling al Qaeda.



Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

If we even know what the mission was. mmonk Feb 2012 #1
if they claim it was to get bin Laden, they are indeed full of it bigtree Feb 2012 #2
I really ProSense Feb 2012 #5
we'll just disagree then bigtree Feb 2012 #7
Here's ProSense Feb 2012 #8
actually, the focus of this administration was bolstering the Karzai regime bigtree Feb 2012 #9
Here ProSense Feb 2012 #10
I don't need the President's statement bigtree Feb 2012 #12
What? ProSense Feb 2012 #17
yeah, you got me there - but this isn't a thesis bigtree Feb 2012 #18
du rec. nt xchrom Feb 2012 #3
If Obama had been in office when the initial decision was made to go into Afghanistan.... Sheepshank Feb 2012 #4
I have a 'slant' on the entire operation which the President escalated bigtree Feb 2012 #6
FUBAR war. FUBAR ending to a lost war that should never have been started. Tierra_y_Libertad Feb 2012 #11
DU-Unrec eom BlueCaliDem Feb 2012 #13
unrec is an outmoded concept here bigtree Feb 2012 #14
It's symbolic, I know. BlueCaliDem Feb 2012 #15
I don't know why bigtree Feb 2012 #16
K&R (nt) T S Justly Feb 2012 #19
He got OBL...we can leave Afghanistan now. Rex Feb 2012 #20
sigh, indeed bigtree Feb 2012 #21
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Obama's Failed Mission in...»Reply #10