Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: I'm now completely done being amazed. [View all]duffyduff
(3,251 posts)41. And you forget this
From Barack Obama:
But he framed the economic recovery efforts more broadly, saying it is impossible to separate the country's financial ills from the long-term need to rein in health-care costs, stabilize Social Security and prevent the Medicare program from bankrupting the government.
"This, by the way, is where there are going to be very difficult choices and issues of sacrifice and responsibility and duty," he said. "You have to have a president who is willing to spend some political capital on this. And I intend to spend some."
Obama is not the first incoming president to make bold declarations about overhauling the nation's retirement and health-care systems. Both Bill Clinton and George W. Bush made similar vows.
And this beaut:
That discussion will begin next month, Obama said, when he convenes a "fiscal responsibility summit" before delivering his first budget to Congress. He said his administration will begin confronting the issues of entitlement reform and long-term budget deficits soon after it jump-starts job growth and the stock market.
"What we have done is kicked this can down the road. We are now at the end of the road and are not in a position to kick it any further," he said. "We have to signal seriousness in this by making sure some of the hard decisions are made under my watch, not someone else's."
http://articles.washingtonpost.com/2009-01-16/politics/36899872_1_barack-obama-key-economic-priority-items-entitlement-reform
Don't sit there and try and confuse the issue by saying Carter did the same thing. He didn't. Carter didn't go around thinking Social Security ought to be "reformed." Obama has.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
85 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I know it must be hard for you to know that your DLC buddies aren't all that.
Arctic Dave
Apr 2013
#28
You're not very good at this, Sid, which I believe you have been told before no?
sabrina 1
Apr 2013
#19
I think you are correct. Look how rich Clinton has gotten since retirement. Clinton started as a
byeya
Apr 2013
#15
Yeah, the Bill Clinton who ran for Congress (1974), attorney general (1976) and governor (1978)
Art_from_Ark
Apr 2013
#65
I think too many on our side was too quiet and accepting as our Party moved to the right...
kentuck
Apr 2013
#20
A good start toward fixing it would be to bring them home. There is no longer a reason
A Simple Game
Apr 2013
#11
Losing their collegiality would be a good thing, they are elected to represent us, not each other.
A Simple Game
Apr 2013
#33
Yes, they are Wall St creation intended to do just what they have done. Wall HAD the Republican
sabrina 1
Apr 2013
#29
Agreed - The Democratic Party Needs A Purging To Drive The DLC Types Back To The Republicans
cantbeserious
Apr 2013
#31
Unbelievable. Thanks for the links. And these are the people we are supposed to trust with
sabrina 1
Apr 2013
#38
Who elected Pete Petersen to anything? Why are our elected officials asking for the advice
sabrina 1
Apr 2013
#39
Sadly, getting ordinary people to "see" the truth is unlikely to change anything.
Laelth
Apr 2013
#84