Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Warpy

(114,636 posts)
2. Nobody denies that we need to be able to mount a strong defense
Sat Apr 13, 2013, 09:39 PM
Apr 2013

This isn't an all or nothing proposition, light switch mentality sort of thing.

What it means is we gradually cede Empire, closing all but the most strategic bases, and consider making friends worldwide rather than intimidating everybody with 150+ foreign bases and multiple wars of corporate convenience.

We're ahead of the UK and other empires in that we have relatively little actual conquered territory to cede, just what our bases are sitting on, and no governments to assist in building from the ground up once the colonialists are out of power.

Constant warfare has bankrupted most empires. It's about to do that to us, especially since the plutocracy has declared itself exempt from paying the costs of it.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Maher: U.S. Needs To Give...»Reply #2