Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Rachel Mocks UFO Citizen Hearing [View all]nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)329. Those are really neat by the way.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
441 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Forgot to mention - the enormous interest she has generated in the topic....nt
fadedrose
Apr 2013
#2
It all gets very very weird. Someone someplace knows a hell of a lot more about all of
RKP5637
Apr 2013
#9
Sci-Fi movies would tell me they are "not" so advanced to avoid crashing
Life Long Dem
Apr 2013
#100
I think there is, in fact, there has to be IMO. No responsible nation is going to let
RKP5637
Apr 2013
#150
Miles O'Brien left CNN because CNN dumped the entire science and technology unit
unrepentant progress
Apr 2013
#63
All things are really possible in a world of infinite permutations and combinations ... it is
RKP5637
Apr 2013
#153
I'd like to think that they are. When I'm even older I will remember that
snappyturtle
Apr 2013
#335
There might be another reason the History Channel mixes UFO stuff in with ghosts, vampires auras,..
Captain Stern
Apr 2013
#108
Pandering to the lowest common denominator and the ignorant masses for profit?
cleanhippie
Apr 2013
#216
Thanks! Part of my education was/is in the sciences ... and the more I learned the
RKP5637
Apr 2013
#348
There's more evidence that UFOs exist than there is that God does but she'd NEVER mock
forestpath
Apr 2013
#5
Sorry, but a person having an experience they do not understand does not equate to evidence for god.
cleanhippie
Apr 2013
#195
And someone who says that they had an experience which they did understand?
Donald Ian Rankin
Apr 2013
#208
People saying " I have experienced X" is not evidence for "X", it's evidence of an experience.
cleanhippie
Apr 2013
#390
This isnt a U.S. Court, this is reality. And in reality, empirical evidence is the only evidence
cleanhippie
Apr 2013
#393
Since you brought up context, did you read this sub-thread to get the context?
cleanhippie
Apr 2013
#400
Not worlds apart at all. The empirical evidence for either premise is non-existent.
cleanhippie
Apr 2013
#405
I am not mistaken. Currently, there is no empirical evidence to support the existence
cleanhippie
Apr 2013
#416
I would consider a war vet who makes those claims to be dealing with bigger issues
cleanhippie
Apr 2013
#424
Again, who a person is or what their credentials are mean squat. If there is no empirical evidence
cleanhippie
Apr 2013
#438
I totally agree with his theories about the brain. My theory and those of others is that the brain
WCLinolVir
Apr 2013
#408
Rachel only mocks ONE group. And I find her double standard hypocritical and
forestpath
Apr 2013
#222
Sorry, but you don't get to pull the fallacy of "argumentum ad ignorantiam..."
Moonwalk
Apr 2013
#42
The grad class from Gilesse 581 actually makes sense--we're the final frat boy ritual...
Moonwalk
Apr 2013
#319
I hope you're not a Christian. If you are, you have a lot of 'splainin'" to do. nt
snappyturtle
Apr 2013
#341
Yes, I did mean anthropocentric. Excuse me, I'm on muscle relaxers, and had a "moment."
Fantastic Anarchist
Apr 2013
#221
Yes, they kept and keep open minds, and certainly don't act like our resident know-it-all.
Fantastic Anarchist
Apr 2013
#245
Aliens are not visiting earth. No proof at all. Pilots do not matter. Neither do police. Rachel.....
Logical
Apr 2013
#7
Rachel is not a traditional journalist. Most commentary. Mocking pseudo science falls in that area.
Logical
Apr 2013
#18
They are mistaken. Like PHDs in Geology who claim the earth is 6000 years old. n-t
Logical
Apr 2013
#38
We do fly in planes piloted by people who make mistakes. Luckily, there are instruments...
Moonwalk
Apr 2013
#45
Yes it is. Especially if the pilot isn't sober...this may make you never want to fly again--
Moonwalk
Apr 2013
#265
They are not reporting "alien" visitation they are reporting unidentified objects.
xtraxritical
Apr 2013
#86
Then if they AREN'T actually space aliens the pilots claiming to have seen "something weird"
Occulus
Apr 2013
#43
Is your argument that no pilot has ever claimed to see a UFO that was later explained? n-t
Logical
Apr 2013
#46
No, my claim is that all the craft that seem to be UFOs were later explained by advanced craft
Occulus
Apr 2013
#56
+1 ... quite true, it's difficult to be an observer when one has, is in, the same
RKP5637
Apr 2013
#156
If your intution tells you that what you've seen but cannot explain is ghosts, gods, or aliens...
cleanhippie
Apr 2013
#199
I haven't read anywhere on this site of anyone claiming/admitting what they saw was the
snappyturtle
Apr 2013
#337
So do the astronauts count? They have seen things also. My ex-fil was a police detective and tracked
Mnemosyne
Apr 2013
#107
I find it odd that now, when cameras are everywhere and people carry phone everywhere that....
Logical
Apr 2013
#140
Really, no pilot has reported a UFO that was easily explained. Even many UFO "experts" admit most...
Logical
Apr 2013
#379
LOL, then anything might be true! Unicorns! Send me definite proof of ANY.....
Logical
Apr 2013
#382
Are you serious? Want a list of pilots who reported UFOs that turned out to be easily explained???
Logical
Apr 2013
#378
We are evidence of aliens - the notion that we are alone in the universe seems almost like religious
aint_no_life_nowhere
Apr 2013
#434
I'm not suggesting anything. I have no idea what it was. The lights were SO
snappyturtle
Apr 2013
#331
I pray to the Lords that there is 'intelligent life' out there because it sure as hell can't be
Purveyor
Apr 2013
#34
ITA. I didn't see it -- I don't usually watch her show -- but it sounds beneath her to do that.
MotherPetrie
Apr 2013
#39
but of course, there can't be any other intelligence in the whole universe besides Rachel's.
Whisp
Apr 2013
#51
Sorry but that's thin at best. So-o it was debunked because of projection of
snappyturtle
Apr 2013
#76
And if that technology is thousands, if not millions of years ahead of ours...
theHandpuppet
Apr 2013
#384
I think a lot of them are military top secret, but I can't say for sure that all of them are --
gateley
Apr 2013
#84
My understanding is the hearing is not simply sci fi, living at home, fanboys "demanding truth"
ZX86
Apr 2013
#257
I thought the issue was the way the topic was covered by a supposedly open minded Liberal.
Spitfire of ATJ
Apr 2013
#75
What I find funny is people who speak with certainty that it's all fake.
Spitfire of ATJ
Apr 2013
#440
Yep, well said, I do the same. To me, it is quite foolish for one to assume they know everything
RKP5637
Apr 2013
#163
I searched for the COMETA report and it is clear it was not peer reviewed
Bjorn Against
Apr 2013
#298
The former Congress members who are participating in the fake hearing are being paid $20,000 each
Bjorn Against
Apr 2013
#302
Ask any legal expert and they will tell you eye witnesses are very unreliable
Bjorn Against
Apr 2013
#309
Yes it is more complicated than people want to admit, but it is humans complicating it not aliens
Bjorn Against
Apr 2013
#371
But this is not science, scientists are not claiming we are being visited by aliens
Bjorn Against
Apr 2013
#166
Has there ever been a case of a commercial airliner colliding with a UFO?
Bjorn Against
Apr 2013
#282
I don't feel a pilot's personal beliefs are relevant to his safe handling of a plane
Bjorn Against
Apr 2013
#287
I am basing it on the fact that they claim to have seen something that is scientifically impossible
Bjorn Against
Apr 2013
#316
Funny. "woo-woo" spontaneously flew out of my mouth when I read the thread title.
alphafemale
Apr 2013
#120
Rachel lost me after the 1st debate.No longer care what she says.I Just watch Rev. Al Sharpton.
graham4anything
Apr 2013
#126
if the universe if infinitely large then there must be an infinite number of planets which do
piratefish08
Apr 2013
#127
Years ago, when the SR71 (then as the YF12) was being evaluated/tested, there
bike man
Apr 2013
#135
I had an uncle who was a colonel in the AF during the early part of the cold war
Victor_c3
Apr 2013
#172
The ignorance of science and the scientific method in this thread is astounding
EvolveOrConvolve
Apr 2013
#209
We're all aliens with the DNA they implanted a couple thousand years ago
Life Long Dem
Apr 2013
#233
Rachel is mocking the "panel of gerbils" that are conducting the "investigation."
immoderate
Apr 2013
#305
The "subject matter" should be mocked: there is no such thing as little green men.
apocalypsehow
Apr 2013
#330
same old, same old-- this is a main thing the media loves to mock and cover-up.
NoMoreWarNow
Apr 2013
#354
if she was a "pretty good " psychic wouldn' you not have to ask her questions ?
olddots
Apr 2013
#359