General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Urgent Warning On New Bird Flu H7N9: Could Pose Global Threat [View all]TM99
(8,352 posts)Last edited Sun Apr 14, 2013, 09:02 AM - Edit history (1)
accepted standard definition in the Dictionary of Epidemiology.
http://ecdc.europa.eu/en/healthtopics/pandemic_preparedness/basic_facts/Pages/definition_of_pandemic.aspx
The 2009 H1N1 'swine flu' was a novel Type A that met all the requirements including world-wide epidemic proportions. Did it kill as many as the 1918-1919 'swine flu' known as the Spanish Flu? No, but a pandemic is not defined by the number of people who die.
The reason why this current bird flu is of potential concern is that it is a novel type. If, and yes, we can not predict whether it will or will not, but if it does cross the animal/human barrier, the potential for another pandemic is, of course, very high. Will it kill only 3500 as the 2009 one did? Or will it kill millions as the 1918-1919 one did? Which do you plan for as a matter of public health policy? Obviously the worst-case and not the best case or you will come up short-handed.
'Skepticism' seems to be thrown around a lot online today not as a valid discussion of reason and/or science but more as a reaction to the faith or true belief involved in the propaganda of MSM or of conspiracy theories. The proper use of words and scientific terms is important if a discussion is not to devolve into school yard antics instead of the sharing of valid information that involves genuine concern.
An article in the New England Journal of Medicine on this novel H7N9 as severely deadly as it has been should be taken very seriously.