Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

xchrom

(108,903 posts)
Sun Apr 14, 2013, 12:43 PM Apr 2013

The Terrifying Reality of Long-Term Unemployment [View all]

http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2013/04/the-terrifying-reality-of-long-term-unemployment/274957/



Close your eyes and picture the scariest thing you can think of. Maybe it's a giant spider or a giant Stay Puft marshmellow man or something that's not even giant at all. Well, whatever it is, I guarantee it's not nearly as scary as the real scariest thing in the world. That's long-term unemployment.

There are two labor markets nowadays. There's the market for people who have been out of work for less than six months, and the market for people who have been out of work longer. The former is working pretty normally, and the latter is horribly dysfunctional. That was the conclusion of recent research I highlighted a few months ago by Rand Ghayad, a visiting scholar at the Boston Fed, and William Dickens, a professor of economics at Northeastern University, that looked at Beveridge curves for different ages, industries, and education levels to see who the recovery is leaving behind.

Okay, so what is a Beveridge curve? Well, it just shows the relationship between job openings and unemployment. There should be a pretty stable relationship between the two, assuming the labor market isn't broken. The more openings there are, the less unemployment there should be. If that isn't true, if the Beveridge curve "shifts up" as more openings don't translate into less unemployment, then it might be a sign of "structural" unemployment. That is, the unemployed just might not have the right skills. Now, what Ghayad and Dickens found is that the Beveridge curves look normal across all ages, industries, and education levels, as long as you haven't been out of work for more than six months. But the curves shift up for everybody if you've been unemployed longer than six months. In other words, it doesn't matter whether you're young or old, a blue-collar or white-collar worker, or a high school or college grad; all that matters is how long you've been out of work.

Help Wanted -- If You've Been Out of Work for Less than Six Months

But just how bad is it for the long-term unemployed? Ghayad ran a follow-up field experiment to find out. In a new working paper, he sent out 4800 fictitious resumes to 600 job openings, with 3600 of them for fake unemployed people. Among those 3600, he varied how long they'd been out of work, how often they'd switched jobs, and whether they had any industry experience. Everything else was kept constant. The mocked-up resumes were all male, all had randomly-selected (and racially ambiguous) names, and all had similar education backgrounds. The question was which of them would get callbacks.



38 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Very interesting. k&r for exposure. n/t Laelth Apr 2013 #1
It is absolutely essential to make it look as though you were employed dickthegrouch Apr 2013 #2
exactly. DCBob Apr 2013 #27
K & R !!! WillyT Apr 2013 #3
Government has to take the lead on this but they won't unless we all act-- Christmas day 2015 nightscanner59 Apr 2013 #4
But the DOW is up! progressoid Apr 2013 #5
With all the rigged sources of information, how can we be sure that the DOW reports are accurate? AnotherMcIntosh Apr 2013 #17
The DOW Purplehazed Apr 2013 #28
That's meaningless. Are you unaware of the LIBOR was rigged by some banksters? AnotherMcIntosh Apr 2013 #31
The homeless are happy too. L0oniX Apr 2013 #22
Time to get really pissed Milliesmom Apr 2013 #6
+1000 smirkymonkey Apr 2013 #30
"We can do better..." ProSense Apr 2013 #7
That's why you should try to be SELF-employed. ErikJ Apr 2013 #8
Except when your business dries up, there's NO unemployment. snot Apr 2013 #9
No you can pay into unemployment same as you would under truedelphi Apr 2013 #12
In PA if you are self - employed you must pay in but you cannot collect. nessa Apr 2013 #33
Well, that totally sucks. truedelphi Apr 2013 #38
My solution supernova Apr 2013 #10
Hello Fabulous! xchrom Apr 2013 #11
Hey you!! supernova Apr 2013 #13
We gotta fix that. xchrom Apr 2013 #15
I heartily agree supernova Apr 2013 #19
I was in business for seven years hfojvt Apr 2013 #32
I use my clients as references. (nt) nessa Apr 2013 #34
in retail hfojvt Apr 2013 #35
That does make it tougher. (nt). nessa Apr 2013 #36
Society needs to come to terms with a world where there are never enough jobs to go around. reformist2 Apr 2013 #14
Bizarro! I hope you just forgot the sarcasm tag. L0oniX Apr 2013 #21
I'm actually serious. Rapidly improving technology is making unemployment a global problem. reformist2 Apr 2013 #25
Well then why work at all "demanding a basic income from the government". L0oniX Apr 2013 #26
at the very least, unemployment compensation should be handled differently wyldwolf Apr 2013 #24
K&R 99Forever Apr 2013 #16
The representatives of the rich and the super-rich will come up with a shiny object AnotherMcIntosh Apr 2013 #18
Anyone who wants to work should have a job. Politicians should be working on jobs not war. L0oniX Apr 2013 #20
I proved this for myself wyldwolf Apr 2013 #23
Since businesses are not people, you owe them no expression of honesty, morality, ethics, Occulus Apr 2013 #37
I finally got a job. Blanks Apr 2013 #29
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Terrifying Reality of...