Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bigtree

(94,672 posts)
18. yeah, you got me there - but this isn't a thesis
Sat Feb 4, 2012, 02:06 PM
Feb 2012

130,000 troops were there to facilitate the establishment (elections) and the expansion ('pushing back' the Taliban) of the Karzai regime. The surge forces were deployed to Kabul, to the border with Pakistan, and the bulk of the forces were dispatched to Marjah and Kandahar and other areas of the Helmand Province in the south.

The surge of U.S. forces into Afghanistan had little to do with al-Qaeda because al-Qaeda was not in Afghanistan in any significant numbers.

Your premise that "the focus became "al-Qaeda" belies the purpose and activity of the bulk of the forces which were not engaged in anything involving 'al-Qaeda',

You say:

"Crushing al Qaeda and getting bin Laden was the effort, which is why many people now say it's time to get out because that has been accomplished. "

That was a dual effort which was not the enterprise of the bulk of the forces the President surged into Afghanistan. That effort involved drones and a border-crossing or two with 'small' forces.

There may well have been a more intensified focus with drones and the raid, but the bulk of the surge forces were involved in trying to degrade the resisting Taliban forces in Afghanistan to make room for their military-enabled Karzai regime.

They supported the regime by providing a perimeter defense in the area around Kabul, and by working to expand the reach and influence of that regime by taking over territory in the south and installing government sponsored rule to replace the Taliban's. The bulk of the forces were involved in chasing down and capturing or killing resisting Afghans - chasing down and killing Afghans that were fighting in opposition to the corrupt Karzai regime that our military 'surged' to maintain and expand in power.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

If we even know what the mission was. mmonk Feb 2012 #1
if they claim it was to get bin Laden, they are indeed full of it bigtree Feb 2012 #2
I really ProSense Feb 2012 #5
we'll just disagree then bigtree Feb 2012 #7
Here's ProSense Feb 2012 #8
actually, the focus of this administration was bolstering the Karzai regime bigtree Feb 2012 #9
Here ProSense Feb 2012 #10
I don't need the President's statement bigtree Feb 2012 #12
What? ProSense Feb 2012 #17
yeah, you got me there - but this isn't a thesis bigtree Feb 2012 #18
du rec. nt xchrom Feb 2012 #3
If Obama had been in office when the initial decision was made to go into Afghanistan.... Sheepshank Feb 2012 #4
I have a 'slant' on the entire operation which the President escalated bigtree Feb 2012 #6
FUBAR war. FUBAR ending to a lost war that should never have been started. Tierra_y_Libertad Feb 2012 #11
DU-Unrec eom BlueCaliDem Feb 2012 #13
unrec is an outmoded concept here bigtree Feb 2012 #14
It's symbolic, I know. BlueCaliDem Feb 2012 #15
I don't know why bigtree Feb 2012 #16
K&R (nt) T S Justly Feb 2012 #19
He got OBL...we can leave Afghanistan now. Rex Feb 2012 #20
sigh, indeed bigtree Feb 2012 #21
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Obama's Failed Mission in...»Reply #18