Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
32. You got it. I would never support a budget or a president who would
Sun Apr 14, 2013, 03:42 PM
Apr 2013

propose a budget or a member of Congress who would vote for a budget that contained the chained CPI or any measure that would cut Social Security benefits.

Fact is that if you get Social Security benefits and have an income of over $80,000 per year, you probably don't keep much if anything of your Social Security benefits. You probably pay taxes of that amount to the federal government. (And maybe even more in taxes than that.)

If you make more than $40,000 per year and receive Social Security, you also pay more in taxes than your rate would normally be on Social Security.

Everyone else on Social Security is receiving an average or below-average income and thus should not have a benefit cut.

Cutting Social Security is the equivalent of giving an employee a permanent pay cut -- that cannot be changed. A lower pay that can never be raised.

I totally and unequivocally will not support any budget or anyone who proposes a budget with cuts to Social Security.

Don't make people prove they are poor.

Some seniors did not pay enough into the Social Security system to qualify for benefits that exceed the poverty level. At this time, those seniors qualify for things like food stamps, housing assistance and Medicaid which are PAID OUT OF THE GENERAL FUND and which raise them above the poverty line in most cases.

It sounds wonderful, absolutely benevolent, to propose that the lowest Social Security benefits be raised. Great idea. But that is not the idea. The idea is to TRANSFER the cost of paying for the extra and very essential benefits to these very poor seniors TO THE SOCIAL SECURITY FUND and then cutting the earned benefits of those who paid into the fund and receive slightly higher benefits.

Are "some people" getting rich from Social Security? Are they living "high off the trough?"

Here is a fact:

What is the maximum monthly Social Security retirement benefit?


The maximum benefit depends on the age a worker chooses to retire. For example, for a worker retiring at age 66 in 2012, the amount is $2,513. This figure is based on earnings at the maximum taxable amount for every year after age 21.

http://ssa-custhelp.ssa.gov/app/answers/detail/a_id/5/~/maximum-social-security-retirement-benefit

That is $30,156 per year.

Granted 2080 hours at the federal minimum wage of $7.25 per year totals only $15,080 per year. But to get $30,156 per year you would have to have earned pretty much the maximum salary of wage subject to Social Security taxes for a number of years. But the average Social Security recipient received $14,760 per year -- slightly less than minimum wage. At least $100 of that $14,760 probably went to pay for Medicare for that senior. Some seniors pay much more. I know someone who is retired, on Medicare and has to pay $300 per month for her Medicare based on the health insurance company that her former employer chose to go with.

There is really a lot of misinformation about Social Security out there.

I am posting this on my DU diary or blog so that I and others can refer to it in the future.

For minimum wage link:

http://www.dol.gov/dol/topic/wages/minimumwage.htm


Email this page
Share

What is the average monthly Social Security benefit for a retired worker?

The average monthly Social Security benefit for a retired worker was about $1,230 at the beginning of 2012. This amount changes monthly based upon the total amount of all benefits paid and the total number of people receiving benefits.

http://ssa-custhelp.ssa.gov/app/answers/detail/a_id/13/~/average-monthly-social-security-benefit-for-a-retired-worker

Qualified support is support cthulu2016 Apr 2013 #1
Agreed. It should not be on the table. If they want to preserve SS, raise the cap. still_one Apr 2013 #2
Agree 100% AndyA Apr 2013 #7
Raise the Cap! Dyedinthewoolliberal Apr 2013 #26
That's pretty obtuse michigandem58 Apr 2013 #3
not in this budget. fucking no way cali Apr 2013 #5
Do you know what obtuse means? Obama proposed this, he supports his proposal. Bluenorthwest Apr 2013 #12
You asked a question and gave an example, all in your subject line michigandem58 Apr 2013 #25
You got it. I would never support a budget or a president who would JDPriestly Apr 2013 #32
Supports it or he's a liar bowens43 Apr 2013 #4
Those do seem to be the choices, yes. n/t Laelth Apr 2013 #14
Agreed. Nt newfie11 Apr 2013 #22
Facts are facts Old Codger Apr 2013 #6
Where he said he wouldn't cut SS Life Long Dem Apr 2013 #11
Silly person ...a cut is something you put a band aid on. L0oniX Apr 2013 #21
It's a "benefit enhancement" that saves $130 billion pscot Apr 2013 #34
Call it anything Old Codger Apr 2013 #35
He specifically promised not to cut using a change in cpi. your bullshit is just that Dragonfli Apr 2013 #36
Don't you kind of find it funny watching about 5 people Rex Apr 2013 #50
It is like arguing with a kindergarten class that thinks Pete the custodian is Pan and can fly Dragonfli Apr 2013 #54
The Bush White House called lowering polution standards their "Blue Skies Initiative". Marr Apr 2013 #48
Cutting through very obtuse verbage Tom Rinaldo Apr 2013 #8
The rich will all still be rich. Most SS recipients will go sick and hungry. That is not "balanced." forestpath Apr 2013 #9
Wow, an increase starting at age 76, phased in over 10 years. Av life expectancy 78.2 Bluenorthwest Apr 2013 #10
The average life expectancy of a 76-year-old is not 2.2 years DavidDvorkin Apr 2013 #16
Yep. Learn how life expectancy works first before you comment. HERVEPA Apr 2013 #51
More weasel words. 99Forever Apr 2013 #13
Slip sliding away. GeorgeGist Apr 2013 #15
. Marrah_G Apr 2013 #17
That is heading in the wrong direction, most don't live that long, typically the wealthy usGovOwesUs3Trillion Apr 2013 #18
It looks like your creating an Excuse. Would you like help? Marr Apr 2013 #19
NO REAL DEMOCRAT WOULD EVER TOUCH SS! L0oniX Apr 2013 #20
Absurd thread title. LWolf Apr 2013 #23
Apparently you think we are idiots. nt. Warren Stupidity Apr 2013 #24
God forbid we should have a balanced view here treestar Apr 2013 #27
Thanks, michigan, for trying to bring rationality to DU on this matter. elleng Apr 2013 #28
Your quite welcome michigandem58 Apr 2013 #29
Right, and I'm not following this thread for that reason; elleng Apr 2013 #31
Actually you've been refuted in this thread and debunked Rex Apr 2013 #49
He proposed it DJ13 Apr 2013 #30
MichiganDem: Here is the link from Whitehouse.gov LeftInTX Apr 2013 #33
Thanks! michigandem58 Apr 2013 #38
This isn't going to happen. Blanks Apr 2013 #37
"If grandma needs food, then drag your lazy ass over to her house and give her some food." cthulu2016 Apr 2013 #39
We need to look out for one another. Blanks Apr 2013 #43
Not everyone of we seniors Bohunk68 Apr 2013 #46
I assumed everyone here is a democrat... Blanks Apr 2013 #47
I imagine you are good at faking suprise bobduca Apr 2013 #52
I see. Blanks Apr 2013 #56
That's exactly the message the elite use in pushing these cuts, and exactly where we were before FDR usGovOwesUs3Trillion Apr 2013 #40
No matter how much money we give to the hungry... Blanks Apr 2013 #41
Works for everyone else, why wouldn't money help the hungry? usGovOwesUs3Trillion Apr 2013 #42
There are certain things that we should be entitled to. Blanks Apr 2013 #44
like social security usGovOwesUs3Trillion Apr 2013 #45
If people are facing starvation... Blanks Apr 2013 #57
"No matter how much money we give to the hungry..." bobduca Apr 2013 #53
I'm afraid this is lost on the good folks bashing the President on this site madokie Apr 2013 #55
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»For those who believe the...»Reply #32