Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

cali

(114,904 posts)
36. well, not quite
Sun Apr 14, 2013, 04:30 PM
Apr 2013

yes, the case will wrongly be used to pass more trap laws, but the clinic operated openly.

<snip>

Why wasn’t this shut down sooner?

This is partly what the grand jury set out to figure out, and their conclusion is disturbing to say the least. Multiple government agencies, hospitals, and organizations sat on information that should have shut the clinic down years earlier.

The Pennsylvania Department of Health audits hospitals and medical facilities. It approved Gosnell’s clinic in 1979. When it checked back a decade later, the report says it found numerous violations but took Gosnell at his word when he promised to fix them.

<snip>

But still, it did get complaints: from several lawyers representing women injured by Gosnell; from a doctor who hand-delivered a complaint alerting the department to the fact that several women referred to Gosnell got the same venereal disease; from the medical examiner of Delaware County informing the department that Gosnell performed an abortion on a 14-year-old girl who was 30 weeks pregnant; and when Mongar, the Bhutanese woman, died.

The Department of State, which licenses individual physicians, also ignored the alarm bells. A decade ago, a former employee reported dangerous conditions at the clinic, but the department let it drop after interviewing Gosnell offsite. Then an insurance company told the department about a 22-year-old woman who died of sepsis after Gosnell perforated her uterus. Again, and several more times, the department ignored complaints.

<snip>

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2013/04/12/why-is-the-media-apologizing-about-kermit-gosnell-coverage.html

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

They already are. In fact, significantly MORE regulated than other outpatient surgical facilities. PeaceNikki Apr 2013 #1
Actually, that's not true B2G Apr 2013 #6
Can you cite any examples of such states? PeaceNikki Apr 2013 #7
Michigan for one B2G Apr 2013 #9
ok, based on those examples of VERY poor TRAP laws, I would reply to your OP with an emphatic "NO!" PeaceNikki Apr 2013 #16
Comparing Abortion clinics to outpatient surgery is a bit disingenuous, at least here in Virginia. Raine1967 Apr 2013 #22
Is anyone you know of arguing for unsanitary or incompetent abortion faccilities? cthulu2016 Apr 2013 #2
Ken Cuccinelli and his appointed BOH members. Raine1967 Apr 2013 #24
Who says that they are not? AnotherMcIntosh Apr 2013 #3
Most cases, yes Lithos Apr 2013 #4
New safety rules are a ruse... Deep13 Apr 2013 #5
yup. La Lioness Priyanka Apr 2013 #13
absolutely not. despite the claims of anti-choicers, abortion cali Apr 2013 #8
Very infomative B2G Apr 2013 #10
very welcome, B. cali Apr 2013 #12
I have never understood that latitude B2G Apr 2013 #15
Gosnell was operating an old style, illegal clinic. Dawson Leery Apr 2013 #33
well, not quite cali Apr 2013 #36
Women must have easy access to safe abortion procedures. Dawson Leery Apr 2013 #39
I hope this thread isn't an advocacy for TRAP laws. PeaceNikki Apr 2013 #11
has there been a recent spate of abortion related deaths or complications? La Lioness Priyanka Apr 2013 #14
Deaths, no B2G Apr 2013 #17
there would be complaints, an increase in lawsuits etc. La Lioness Priyanka Apr 2013 #19
It's researched and information can be found by googling. cali Apr 2013 #25
Yes. Anti-choicers are using the Gosnell case as their 'Sandy Hook' PeaceNikki Apr 2013 #18
but it's one case and one doctor? La Lioness Priyanka Apr 2013 #20
I think not. But reproductive choice has been under attack for some time. PeaceNikki Apr 2013 #21
No. But that will happen as these cretins push abortion back into cali Apr 2013 #28
Thanks Nikki. I'm definitely pro choice B2G Apr 2013 #23
I understand. Like I said, I know that this case is being used to push for TRAP PeaceNikki Apr 2013 #26
It certainly is and it greatly concerns me that they're having ANY cali Apr 2013 #27
"Anti-choicers are using the Gosnell case as their 'Sandy Hook'" B2G Apr 2013 #30
Any facility in which physicians practice medicine is already kestrel91316 Apr 2013 #29
this. La Lioness Priyanka Apr 2013 #32
You guys rock B2G Apr 2013 #31
Should be just like any other dr office. No reason to single them out at all on point Apr 2013 #34
The Gosnell case is a failure of the state medical board and Board of Health to regulate. Manifestor_of_Light Apr 2013 #35
yes. cali Apr 2013 #37
Don't be ridiculous. Iggo Apr 2013 #38
It will increase the cost to something like outpatient surgery LeftInTX Apr 2013 #40
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Should abortion clinics b...»Reply #36